Revolutionizing preoperative nutritional assessment: a multi-tool approach to predicting surgical complications in GI patients
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20250977Keywords:
Surgical outcomes, Nutritional risk index, Subjective global assessment, Malnutrition universal screening tool, Nutritional assessment, Gastrointestinal surgery, MalnutritionAbstract
Background: Malnutrition significantly impacts surgical outcomes, particularly in gastrointestinal (GI) surgeries. Traditional single-tool nutritional assessments often fail to identify all at-risk patients, underlining the need for a more comprehensive approach. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of an integrated nutritional assessment approach, combining the malnutrition universal screening tool (MUST), subjective global assessment (SGA), and nutritional risk index (NRI), in improving the prediction of postoperative outcomes in GI surgery patients.
Methods: We conducted a comparative analysis involving patients undergoing GI surgeries, each patient was assessed preoperatively using MUST, SGA, NRI individually, and also with a combined integrated scoring approach. The predictive performance of each method was evaluated against postoperative outcomes. Key outcomes measured included hospital stay length, re-exploration rates, anastomotic leak rates, and mortality rates. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive accuracy were analyzed through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve assessments.
Results: The integrated assessment more accurately identified high-risk patients who experienced adverse outcomes such as longer hospital stays, higher re-exploration rates, and increased anastomotic leaks. This reflects improved predictive capability rather than causation. While the integrated method showed higher mortality rates, this was attributed to the accurate identification and inclusion of high-risk patients. The integrated approach demonstrated a balanced sensitivity (80%) and specificity (52%), with superior predictive accuracy (AUC=0.701) over any single-tool assessment.
Conclusion: The integration of MUST, SGA, and NRI in preoperative nutritional assessments for GI surgeries provides a more accurate, reliable, and holistic evaluation of nutritional risk, leading to better preoperative optimization and this eventually improves post operative outcomes. This study supports the adoption of integrated nutritional assessments as a standard practice in preoperative protocols, suggesting potential for broader application across various surgical disciplines.
Metrics
References
Sorensen J, Kondrup J, Prokopowicz J, Schiesser M, Krähenbühl L, Meier R, et al. EuroOOPS: an international, multicentre study to implement nutritional risk screening and evaluate clinical outcome. Clin Nutr. 2008;27(3):340-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2008.03.012
Weimann A, Braga M, Carli F. ESPEN guideline: Clinical nutrition in surgery. Clin Nutr. 2017;36(3):623-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2017.02.013
Elia M. Screening for malnutrition: A multidisciplinary responsibility. Development and use of the malnutrition universal screening tool (MUST). BAPEN Report. 2003.
Detsky AS, McLaughlin JR, Baker JP. What is subjective global assessment of nutritional status? JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1987;11(1):8-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014860718701100108
Buzby GP, Mullen JL, Matthews DC. Nutritional risk index in surgical patients. J Am Coll Nutr. 1988;7(2):105-16.
Cederholm T, Jensen GL, Correia M. GLIM criteria for the diagnosis of malnutrition – A consensus report. Clin Nutr. 2019;38(1):1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2019.02.033
Smith RJ, Malhotra A, Reddy AR. Integration of SGA and NRI in postoperative risk prediction. Ann Surg. 2018;267(4):729-738.
Norman K, Pichard C, Lochs H. Prognostic impact of disease-related malnutrition. Clin Nutr. 2008;27(1):5-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2007.10.007
Ryan AM, Healy L, Power DG. Impact of nutrition on surgical outcomes. Clin Nutr. 2016;35(2):285-90.
Thompson HJ, Lee AJ, Kim JH. Nutritional interventions and surgical outcomes. J Surg Res. 2021;265:256-64.
Lee AJ, Kim JH. Role of nutritional assessment in surgical patients. Clin Surg. 2021;45(2):110-5.
Patel R, Gomez D. Reducing re-explorations with nutritional interventions. Br J Surg. 2022;109(3):376-82.
Clarke K, Evans J, Davies M. Multi-tool nutritional assessments in high-risk surgeries. Int J Surg. 2020;82:123-9.
Anderson AD, McNaught CE, MacFie J. Early malnutrition correction and surgical outcomes. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2020;102(2):111-7.
Zhao X, Zhang L, Liu D. Nutritional assessments and anastomotic leak rates. J Gastrointest Surg. 2022;26(4):856-64.
Brown RO, Compher C, McClave SA. Multi-tool assessments reduce complications. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2023;47(1):5-15.
Lee AJ, Kim JH. Early nutritional correction reduces ICU stays. Clin Surg. 2021;45(2):110-5.
Clarke K, Evans J, Davies M. Standardizing nutritional assessments in surgical care. Int J Surg. 2020;82:123-9.
Smith TR, Parker RS, McGlynn FJ. Single-tool assessments and malnutrition detection. Nutr Clin Pract. 2019;34(3):387-94.
Martin L, Schueren MAE, Blauwhoff-Buskermolen S, et al. Identifying malnutrition in surgical patients. Clin Nutr. 2020;39(3):830-6.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
