Demographic and clinical profile of amblyopia in paediatric age group at a tertiary care centre in northern India

Ananta Raina; Neharika Verma; Ashok K. Sharma

doi:10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20250985

Authors

Ananta Raina Department of Ophthalmology, Government Doon Medical College, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
Neharika Verma Department of Ophthalmology, Government Medical College, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India
Ashok K. Sharma Department of Ophthalmology, Government Medical College, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20250985

Keywords:

Amblyopia, Occlusion therapy, Refractive error

Abstract

Background: Amblyopia, also referred to as "lazy eye," is one of the most common leading causes of monocular visual impairments among children around the world. This study was aimed to study the demographic profile, type and treatment outcome of amblyopia in children visiting a tertiary care centre in Northern India.

Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted on 250 children between the ages of 3-18 years, diagnosed with amblyopia between 2020-2024 in GMC, Jammu. A patient register was developed, comprising patient’s name, age, gender, type of amblyopia and treatment outcome. The data were analysed using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests.

Results: Most cases (76%) were diagnosed in children aged 3-10 years, with a male predominance (64.8%). The most common type was refractive amblyopia (48%) followed by strabismic (32%) and deprivation amblyopia (20%). Astigmatism was the most common refractive error (58.3%). Outcomes of treatment were reported, improved in 72% of cases, non-improved in 20%, and non-applicable in 8% of patients.

Conclusions: Amblyopia is best addressed when detected early enough. Amblyopia burden can be significantly reduced by integrating school-based vision screening programs and addressing socio-cultural barriers. More population-based studies are needed to explore its prevalence and accompanying determinants in different contexts.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Ro Kates MM, Beal CJ. Amblyopia. JAMA 2021;325(4):408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.5741

Von Noorden GK, Campos E. Binocular vision and ocular motility. 6th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 2002.

Kaur S, Sharda S, Aggarwal H, Dadeya S. Comprehensive review of amblyopia: types and management. Ind J Ophthalmol 2023;71(7):2677-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_338_23

O'Connor AR, Birch EE, Anderson S, Draper H. Relationship between binocular vision, visual acuity, and fine motor skills. Optom Vis Sci. 2010;87(12):942-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181fd132e

Hu B, Liu Z, Zhao J, Zeng L, Hao G, Shui D, Mao K. The global prevalence of amblyopia in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:819998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.819998

Meng Z, Fu J, Chen W, Li L, Su H, Dai W, et al. Prevalence of amblyopia and associated risk factors in Tibetan grade one children. Ophthalmic Res. 2021;64:280-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000511264

Ganekal S, Jhanji V, Liang Y, Dorairaj S. Prevalence and etiology of amblyopia in southern India: results from screening of school children aged 5-15 years. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2013;20(4):228-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/09286586.2013.809772

Mondal M, Ghosh AK, Dutta S. Prevalence and pattern of amblyopia among children attending a tertiary eye care centre in Eastern India. Int J Res Med Sci. 2022;10(2):435-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20220288

DK P. Anisometropia. In: Brookman KE, editor. Boston: Butterman-Heinemann; 1996:99-121.

Tuchsen L. Causing and curing infantile esotropia in primates: The role of decorrelated binocular input. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2007;105:564-93.

Blair K, Cibis G, Zeppieri M, Gulani AC. Amblyopia. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025.

Fayi KA, Alahmari DS, Alamri DS, Al-Falki YH. Prevalence of amblyopia and its impact on academic performance of male medical students in southern Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2018;32(4):290-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjopt.2018.09.002

Chen AM, Cotter SA. The amblyopia treatment studies: Implications for clinical practice. Adv Ophthalmol Optom. 2016;1(1):287-305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yaoo.2016.03.007

Pant K, Khan S, Bansal R. Prevalence of persistent refractive amblyopia amongst schoolchildren in North India: A population-based observational study of childhood visual deficit and its correlation with heterophoria and NPC. Int J Res Rev. 2020;7(9):11-16.

Harvey EM. Development and treatment of astigmatism-related amblyopia. Optom Vis Sci. 2009;86(6):634-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181a6165f

Azad AD, Charles AG, Ding Q, Trickey AW, Wren SM. The gender gap and healthcare: Associations between gender roles and factors affecting healthcare access in Central Malawi, June-August 2017. Arch Public Health. 2020;78(1):119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-020-00497-w

Courtright P, Lewallen S. Improving gender equity in eye care: Advocating for the needs of women. Commu Eye Heal. 2007;20(64):68-9.