Comparison between single point versus double point injection in supraclavicular block incidence: ulnar sparing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20253144Keywords:
Supraclavicular block, Brachial plexus, Bupivacaine, Corner pocket, Superior pocketAbstract
Background: This study compared the efficacy of single-point versus double-point injection techniques in ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks, focusing on success rate, procedural time, onset and duration of sensory and motor block, and complications.
Methods: Twenty patients (20-80 years) undergoing forearm surgery over one hour were randomized into two groups. Group D received 20 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine divided into two 10 ml injections (superior cluster and inferior corner pocket). Group S received the entire 20 ml in the superior cluster pocket. Ultrasound guidance was used to locate the brachial plexus. Sensory and motor blockade onset were assessed by pinprick test and Bromage scale. Procedural time was recorded from ultrasound scanning to drug administration completion. Duration of blockade and adverse events were also noted.
Results: Group D showed a significantly higher success rate (p<0.0001) and longer procedural time compared to group S. Onset of sensory and motor block was faster, and duration was significantly prolonged in group D.
Conclusions: Double-point injection results in faster onset, longer duration, and higher success rate of supraclavicular blocks compared to single-point injection, but requires more procedural time.
Metrics
References
Abdelhamid B, Emam M, Mostafa M, Hasanin A, Awada W, Rady A, et al. The ability of perfusion index to detect segmental ulnar nerve sparing after supraclavicular nerve block. J Clin Monit Comput. 2020;34(6):1185-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-019-00443-4
Gupta S, Bhardwaj H, Sahoo T, Gupta S, Trivedi G. Efficacy of intertruncal and corner-pocket approaches of ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block in terms of ulnar nerve blockade: a randomised controlled study. Indian J Anesth. 2023;67:778-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_45_23
Choudhary N, Kumar A, Kohli A, Sethi S. Single-point versus double-point injection technique of ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block: a randomized controlled study. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2019;35(3):373-8.
Jo Y, Park J, Oh C, Chung W, Song S, Lee J, et al. Comparison of the ulnar nerve blockade between intertruncal and corner pocket approaches for supraclavicular block: a randomized controlled trial. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology. 2021;74(6):522-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.21028
Park SK, Lee SY, Kim WH, Park HS, Lim YJ, Bahk JH. Comparison of supraclavicular and infraclavicular brachial plexus block: a systemic review of randomized controlled trials. Anesth Analg. 2017;124(2):636-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000001713
Choi JJ, Kwak HJ, Jung WS, Chung SH, Lee MG. Sonographic guidance for supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks: single versus double injection cluster approach. Pain Phys. 2017;20(6):529. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36076/ppj.20.5.529
Luo Q, Yao W, Chai Y, Chang L, Yao H, Liang J, et al. Comparison of ultrasound-guided supraclavicular and costoclavicular brachial plexus block using a modified double-injection technique: a randomized non-inferiority trial. Biosci Rep. 2020;40(6). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1042/BSR20200084
Karmakar MK, Ho AMH, Chui PT, Wong J, Kwok WH, Tsui BCH. Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block using a double-injection technique: a randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2011;114(3):622-8.
Choudhary N, Kumar A, Kohli A, Sethi S. Single-point versus double-point injection technique of ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block: a randomized controlled study. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2019;35(3):373-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_144_18
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
