Comprehensive physicochemical analysis of ferric carboxymaltose products marketed in India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20251754Keywords:
Colloidal injection, Ferric carboxymaltose, Iron deficiency anemia, Iron oxyhydroxide complex, Physicochemical parametersAbstract
Background: Intravenous iron therapy is essential for managing iron-deficiency anemia (IDA). Ferric carboxymaltose (FCM), a colloidal complex of ferric oxyhydroxide within a carboxymaltose shell, enhances iron delivery and supports hemoglobin synthesis. However, stability, uniformity, shelf life and efficacy challenges persist across available FCM formulations in the Indian market. The latest Indian Pharmacopoeia (IP) guidelines emphasize evaluating key physicochemical properties to ensure the quality and safety of formulations.
Methods: This first-of-its-kind study comprehensively analyzes nine marketed injectable FCM formulations including an innovator and competing brands A-H, by evaluating their physicochemical parameters with statistical validation.
Results: The evaluation highlights significant deviations in key physicochemical parameters among the brands. Brand C exceeds acceptable density and particle size limits, leading to a high PDI and increased risk of agglomeration. Brand E shows low molecular weight and carbohydrate content with an elevated PDI, indicating instability and rapid iron release. Brand F, with a higher molecular weight, exhibits elevated PD and PDI values, reflecting molecular weight diversity. Brand H surpasses acceptable density and carbohydrate content ranges, further evidenced by its high PDI.
Conclusions: FCM is widely used for IDA and pregnancy, offering rapid iron replenishment with fewer doses and cost effectiveness. This study highlights quality and safety variations among injectable FCM brands. Brand A, with strong physicochemical properties interms of osmolality, iron core size, zeta potential, particle size, iron and carbohydrate contents comparable to the innovator, stands out as a reliable option for intravenous iron supplementation, ensuring efficacy and patient safety.
Metrics
References
Henry DH, Dahl N V, Auerbach M, Tchekmedyian S, Laufman LR. Intravenous ferric gluconate significantly improves response to epoetin alfa versus oral iron or no iron in anemic patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy. Oncol. 2007;12(2):231–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.12-2-231
Tandon R, Jain A, Malhotra P. Management of Iron Deficiency Anemia in Pregnancy in India. Indian J Hematol Blood Transf. 2018;34(2):204–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12288-018-0949-6
Borse DS, Mitra B, Maji D. Ferric carboxymaltose: choice of treatment in postpartum anaemia in Multispeciality zonal hospital of armed forces medical services. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2019;8(12):4815. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20195326
WHO, health-Topics, Anemia. Available at: https://www.who.int/health. Accessed on 21 January 2025.
Barton JC, Barton EH, Bertoli LF, Gothard CH, Sherrer JS. Intravenous iron dextran therapy in patients with iron deficiency and normal renal function who failed to respond to or did not tolerate oral iron supplementation. Am J Med. 2000;109(1):27–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9343(00)00396-X
Wysowski DK, Swartz L, Vicky Borders‐Hemphill B, Goulding MR, Dormitzer C. Use of parenteral iron products and serious anaphylactic‐type reactions. Am J Hematol. 2010;85(9):650–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.21794
Public Assessment Report IJzer (III) carboxymaltose Sandoz 50 mg/ml, solution for injection or infusion (ferric carboxymaltose). Available at: https://www.geneesmiddeleninfor. Accessed on 12 January 2025.
Zou P, Tyner K, Raw A, Lee S. Physicochemical Characterization of Iron Carbohydrate Colloid Drug Products. AAPS J. 2017;19(5):1359–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-017-0126-0
pH Meter Instrument. Available at: https://group.chem.iastate.edu. Accessed on 21 December 2024.
Draft proposal for comments and inclusion in the Indian pharmacopoeia ferric carboxymaltose. Available at: https://www.ipc.gov.in, Accessed on 12 December 2024.
Standard test method for density and relative density (specific gravity) of viscous materials by bingham pycnometer. Available at: https://img.antpedia.com. Accessed on 18 December 2024.
Vigneron J, Sacrez M, D’Huart É, Demoré B. Assessment of the relevance of osmolality measurement as a criterion for the stability of solutions. Pharm Technol Hosp Pharm. 2023;8(1):20220008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/pthp-2022-0008
Zafar M, Liaquat S. Polymer science: research advances, practical applications and educational aspects. 2015. Available at: https://www.semanticscholar.org Accessed on 21 January 2025.
Geisser P, Burckhardt S. The Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Iron Preparations. Pharmaceutics. 2011;3(1):12–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics3010012
Balakrishnan VS, Rao M, Kausz AT, Brenner L, Pereira BJG, Frigo TB, et al. Physicochemical properties of ferumoxytol, a new intravenous iron preparation. Eur J Clin Invest. 2009;39(6):489–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2362.2009.02130.x
Agustina E, Goak J, Lee S, Seo Y, Park J, Lee N. Simple and Precise Quantification of Iron Catalyst Content in Carbon Nanotubes Using UV/Visible Spectroscopy. Chemistry Open. 2015;4(5):613–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/open.201500096
Di Francesco T, Delafontaine L, Philipp E, Lechat E, Borchard G. Iron polymaltose complexes: Could we spot physicochemical differences in medicines sharing the same active pharmaceutical ingredient. European J Pharma Sci. 2020;143:105180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2019.105180
Yasir M, Tariq A, Jamshaid U. UV-visible spectrophotometric method development and validation of assay of iron sucrose injection. International J Pure Apllied Biosci. 2015;5:636.
Totan M, Antonescu E, Gligor FG. Quantitative Spectrophotometric Determinations of Fe3+ in Iron Polymaltose Solution. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2018;80(2):65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4172/pharmaceutical-sciences.1000354
Bhattacharjee S. DLS and zeta potential – What they are and what they are not. J Control Rel. 2016;235:337–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.06.017
Fütterer S. Nanoparticular iron complex drugs for parenteral administration - physicochemical characterization, biological distribution and pharmacological safety. Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz. 2014. Available at: https://openscience.ub.un. Accessed on 21 December 2024.
Jahn MR, Andreasen HB, Fütterer S, Nawroth T, Schünemann V, Kolb U, et al. A comparative study of the physicochemical properties of iron isomaltoside 1000 (Monofer®), a new intravenous iron preparation and its clinical implications. Euro J Pharma Biopharm. 2011;78(3):480–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2011.03.016
Tabasi O, Roohi Razlighi M, Falamaki C. A comprehensive study of intravenous iron-carbohydrate nanomedicines: From synthesis methodology to physicochemical and pharmaceutical characterization. J Carbohydr Chem. 2023;42(3):1–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07328303.2023.2272892
Danaei M, Dehghankhold M, Ataei S, Hasanzadeh Davarani F, Javanmard R, Dokhani A, et al. Impact of Particle Size and Polydispersity Index on the Clinical Applications of Lipidic Nanocarrier Systems. Pharma. 2018;10(2):57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics10020057
Kumari A, Chauhan AK. Iron nanoparticles as a promising compound for food fortification in iron deficiency anemia: a review. J Food Sci Technol. 2022; 59(9):3319–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-021-05184-4
Wu Y, Petrochenko P, Chen L, Wong SY, Absar M, Choi S, et al. Core size determination and structural characterization of intravenous iron complexes by cryogenic transmission electron microscopy. Int J Pharm. 2016;505(1):167–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.03.029
Bhandari S, Pereira DIA, Chappell HF, Drakesmith H. Intravenous Irons: From Basic Science to Clinical Practice. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2018;11(3):82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ph11030082
Koduru P, Abraham BP. The role of ferric carboxymaltose in the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in patients with gastrointestinal disease. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2016;9(1):76–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1756283X15616577
Kudasheva DS, Lai J, Ulman A, Cowman MK. Structure of carbohydrate-bound polynuclear iron oxyhydroxide nanoparticles in parenteral formulations. J Inorg Biochem. 2004;98(11):1757–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2004.06.010
Amerine LB, Pasour T, Johnson S, Higgins JP, Pyle J, Gehring C. Evaluation of density variations to determine impact on sterile compounding. American J Health-System Pharm. 2022;79(8):689–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxab440
Funk F, Flühmann B, Barton AE. Criticality of Surface Characteristics of Intravenous Iron–Carbohydrate Nanoparticle Complexes: Implications for Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(4):2140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23042140
Injectafer® (ferric carboxymaltose injection), for intravenous use. Available from: https://accessdata.fda.gov. Accessed on 21 December 2024.
Macdougall IC, Geisser P. Use of intravenous iron supplementation in chronic kidney disease: an update. Iran J Kidney Dis. 2013;7(1):9–22.