Prediction of post-surgical complications in hand reconstruction using machine learning

Authors

  • Irvin Hernandez Sanchez Department of General Surgery, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), General Hospital of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
  • Mauricio Gerardo Martínez Morales Department of General Surgery, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), General Hospital of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
  • Daniela Maria Mercado Botero Department of General Surgery, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), General Hospital of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20251625

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence, Hand reconstruction, Machine learning, Postoperative complications

Abstract

Background: Hand reconstruction is a complex surgical procedure in which various postoperative complications may arise, such as infections, flap necrosis, and joint stiffness. The prediction of these complications has traditionally relied on the surgeon’s experience and conventional clinical models. However, artificial intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning, has proven to be an effective tool for analyzing large volumes of clinical data and enhancing predictive capabilities in various medical fields.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted with a sample of 200 patients who underwent hand reconstruction, using exclusively clinical record data. Three machine learning models were evaluated: XGBoost, Random Forest, and an artificial neural network. A data preprocessing pipeline, feature selection, and cross-validation were applied to optimize model performance. Predictive capability was assessed using the ROC curve and the area under the curve (AUC).

Results: XGBoost achieved the best performance with an AUC of 0.88, followed by Random Forest (AUC = 0.88) and the artificial neural network (AUC = 0.86). The most relevant variables for predicting complications included patient age, comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, type of injury, and surgery duration.

Conclusions: AI models proved to be useful tools for predicting postoperative complications in hand reconstruction, surpassing the accuracy of conventional methods. In particular, XGBoost demonstrated the highest predictive capacity. These findings suggest that machine learning could optimize surgical planning and clinical decision-making, although further studies are needed to validate its applicability across different populations.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Sabapathy SR, Del Piñal F, Boyer MI, Lee DC, Sebastin SJ, Venkatramani H. Management of a mutilated hand: the current trends. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2022;47(1):98-104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934211047760

Wei FC, Mardini S. Free-style free flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114(4):910-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000133171.65075.81

Dibbs R, Grome L, Pederson WC. Free tissue transfer for upper extremity reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg. 2019;33(1):17-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1677702

Lee YJ, Kim J, Lee CR, Kim JH, Oh DY, Jun YJ, Moon SH. Anterolateral thigh chimeric flap: an alternative reconstructive option to free flaps for large soft tissue defects. J Clin Med. 2023;12(21):6723. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12216723

Alderman AK, Chung KC. Measuring outcomes in hand surgery. Clin Plast Surg. 2013;40(2):325-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2012.10.005

Hassan AM, Rajesh A, Asaad M, Nelson JA, Coert JH, Mehrara BJ, et al. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in prediction of surgical complications: current state, applications, and implications. Am Surg. 2023;89(1):25-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348221101488

Ting Sim JZ, Fong QW, Huang W, Tan CH. Machine learning in medicine: what clinicians should know. Singapore Med J. 2023;64(2):91-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2021054

Parikh RB, Obermeyer Z, Navathe AS. Regulation of predictive analytics in medicine. Science. 2019;363(6429):810-812. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw0029

Senders JT, Staples PC, Karhade AV, Zaki MM, Gormley WB, Broekman ML, et al. Machine learning and neurosurgical outcome prediction: a systematic review. World Neurosurg. 2018;109:476-486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.09.149

Mantelakis A, Khajuria A. The applications of machine learning in plastic and reconstructive surgery: protocol of a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2020;9(1):44 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01304-x

Telich-Tarriba JE, Meraz-Soto JM, Prieto-Vargas V. Applications of artificial intelligence in plastic and reconstructive surgery: a comprehensive review of the literature. Cir Plast. 2023;33(4):152-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35366/113881

Ribeiro MT, Singh S, Guestrin C. "Why should I trust you?" Explaining the predictions of any classifier. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. 2016;1135-1144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939778

Navarini L, Sperti M, Currado D, Costa L, Deriu MA, Margiotta DPE, et al. A machine-learning approach to cardiovascular risk prediction in psoriatic arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020;59(7):1767-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kez677

Deo RC. Machine learning in medicine. Circulation. 2015;132(20):1920-1930. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.001593

Kuenzi BM, Park J, Fong SH, Sanchez KS, Lee J, Kreisberg JF, et al. Predicting drug response and synergy using a deep learning model of human cancer cells. Cancer Cell. 2020;38(5):672-684.e6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2020.09.014

Cho YR, Kang M. Interpretable machine learning in bioinformatics. Methods. 2020;179:1-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2020.05.024

Downloads

Published

2025-05-30

How to Cite

Hernandez Sanchez, I., Morales, M. G. M., & Botero, D. M. M. (2025). Prediction of post-surgical complications in hand reconstruction using machine learning. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 13(6), 2367–2371. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20251625

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles