Hamstring versus peroneus longus autograft for arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction – which is better for Indian population?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20252395Keywords:
ACL reconstruction, Indian population, Hamstring autograft, Peroneus longus autograftAbstract
Background: Hamstring autograft has been a popular option for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Of late, the use of peroneus longus tendon has shown promising results. Indian population is predominantly kneeling population where squatting and sitting crossed are associated with daily living activities. This study involves the comparative analysis of the morbidities associated with both the grafts and the choice of autograft based on the Indian population needs.
Methods: A comparative cohort study was conducted on 60 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction during 2022-2023.The patients were randomly assigned for either peroneus longus or hamstring autograft. After a follow-up of one year, the donor site morbidities were assessed using Lysholm score for knee and foot and ankle disability index (FADI) for ankle joint.
Results: A significant statistical difference (p value ≤0.001) was seen in the mean time required to harvest hamstring and peroneal grafts. Although the Lysholm scores were statistically insignificant (p=0.03) in both the groups, 20% of patients with hamstring graft, recorded VAS pain score >7/10 while deep squatting and loading heavy weights. FADI scores of the donor side and contralateral side in patients with peroneal graft showed statistically insignificant results (p value=0.06).
Conclusions: Owing to the graft diameter, robust quality, tensile strength and lesser knee joint morbidity, peroneus longus can be considered as a better alternative autograft to the Indian population. However, in athletes, a careful decision should be made as further long-term studies are required to assess the ankle joint morbidity due to this autograft.
Metrics
References
Toor AS, Limpisvasti O, Ihn HE, McGarry MH, Banffy M, Lee TQ. The significant effect of the medial hamstrings on dynamic knee stability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27(8):2608-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5283-x
Liu CT, Lu YC, Huang CH. Half-peroneus-longus-tendon graft augmentation for unqualified hamstring tendon graft of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sci. 2015;20(5):854-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-015-0744-2
Shi FD, Hess DE, Zuo JZ, Liu SJ, Wang XC, Zhang Y, et al. Peroneus Longus Tendon Autograft is a Safe and Effective Alternative for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. J Knee Surg. 2019;32(8):804-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1669951
Nazem K, Barzegar M, Hosseini A, Karimi M. Can we use peroneus longus in addition to hamstring tendons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Adv Biomed Res. 2014;3:115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.132696
Shao X, Shi LL, Bluman EM, Wang S, Xu X, Chen X, et al. Satisfactory functional and MRI outcomes at the foot and ankle following harvesting of full thickness peroneus longus tendon graft. Bone Joint J. 2020;102-B(2):205-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.102B2.BJJ-2019-0949.R1
Wicaksono FH, Rhatomy S, Budipharama NC. Ankle eversion and first ray plantar flexion muscle strength after peroneus longus tendon harvest for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020;8(5):5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967120S00071
Khajotia BL, Chauhan S, Sethia R, Chopra BL. Functional outcome of arthroscopic reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament tear using peroneus longus tendon autograft. Int J Res Orthop. 2018;4(6):898. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20184382
Rhatomy S, Asikin AIZ, Wardani AE, Rukmoyo T, Lumban-Gaol I, Budhiparama NC. Peroneus longus autograft can be recommended as a superior graft to hamstring tendon in single-bundle ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27(11):3552-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05455-w
Ziai P, Benca E, von Skrbensky G, Graf A, Wenzel F, Basad E, et al. The role of the peroneal tendons in passive stabilisation of the ankle joint: an in vitro study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(6):1404-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2273-2
Zhao Z, Tang L, Chen J, Bai X, Chen Y, Ng L, et al. The effect of harvesting the anterior half of the peroneus longus tendon on foot morphology and gait. J Orthop Surg Res. 2024;19(1):69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04429-6
He J, Tang Q, Ernst S, Linde MA, Smolinski P, Wu S, et al. Peroneus longus tendon autograft has functional outcomes comparable to hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29(9):2869-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06279-9
Otis JC, Deland JT, Lee S, Gordon J. Peroneus brevis is a more effective evertor than peroneus longus. Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25(4):242-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/107110070402500408
Rudy, Mustamsir E, Phatama KY. Tensile strength comparison between peroneus longus and hamstring tendons: A biomechanical study. Int J Surg Open. 2017;9:41-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijso.2017.10.002
Steiner M. Editorial Commentary: Size Does Matter—Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Diameter Affects Biomechanical and Clinical Outcomes. J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2017;33(5):1014-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2017.01.020
Mishra P, Ajay, Goyal A, Mehta N, Lal H, Kumar S. Comparison of semitendinosus tendon length and diameter in sports and non-sports group for ACL reconstruction. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020;11(5):S795-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2020.08.002
Haupt E, OKeefe KJ, Clay TB, Kenney N, Farmer KW. Biomechanical Properties of Small-Size Hamstring Autografts. Cureus. 2020;12(6):e8728. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8728
Sakti M, Yurianto H, Pasallo P, Hidayatullah S, Faisal A, Subagio ES. Anthropometric parameters measurement to predict 4-strand hamstring autograft size in single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction of South Sulawesi population. Int J Surg Open. 2019;21(1):58-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijso.2019.11.005
Asif N, Ranjan R, Ahmed S, Sabir AB, Jilani LZ, Qureshi OA. Prediction of quadruple hamstring graft diameter for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by anthropometric measurements. Indian J Orthop. 2016;50(1):49-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.173521
Treme G, Diduch DR, Billante MJ, Miller MD, Hart JM. Hamstring graft size prediction: a prospective clinical evaluation. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(11):2204-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546508319901
Ateş O, Bozkurt I, Uluyardimci E, Öçgüder DA, Uğurlu M. Relationship between graft failure following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and hamstring autograft diameter. Acta Orthop Belg. 2023;89(3):429-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52628/89.3.11518
Jagadeesh N, Dhawan T, Sheik F, Shivalingappa V. Does Hamstring Graft Size Affect Functional Outcome and Incidence of Revision Surgery After Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction? Cureus. 2022;14(1):e21158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.21158
Angthong C, Chernchujit B, Apivatgaroon A, Chaijenkit K, Nualon P, Suchao-in K. The Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with the Peroneus Longus Tendon: A Biomechanical and Clinical Evaluation of the Donor Ankle Morbidity. J Med Assoc Thai. 2015;98(6):555-60.
Keays SL, Bullock-Saxton J, Keays AC, Newcombe P. Muscle strength and function before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using semitendonosus and gracilis. The Knee. 2001;8(3):174-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0160(01)00099-0
Ardern CL, Webster KE, Taylor NF, Feller JA. Hamstring strength recovery after hamstring tendon harvest for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison between graft types. Arthroscopy. 2010;26:462-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2009.08.018