Comparative analysis of short-term outcomes between upper radical and total radical gastrectomy in patients with proximal gastric cancer

Authors

  • M. Reazul Alam Department of Surgical Oncology, National Institute of Cancer Research and Hospital, Mohakhali, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • M. Abu Sayem Department of Surgical Oncology, National Institute of Cancer Research and Hospital, Mohakhali, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • M. Abdullah Yusuf Jamil Department of Surgical Oncology, National Institute of Cancer Research and Hospital, Mohakhali, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Mohammad Sahajadul Alam Department of Surgical Oncology, National Institute of Cancer Research and Hospital, Mohakhali, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Nadia Farzana Islam Department of Surgical Oncology, National Institute of Cancer Research and Hospital, Mohakhali, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • M. Shahinur Rahman Department of Surgical Oncology, National Institute of Cancer Research and Hospital, Mohakhali, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Ashrafur Rahman Department of Surgical Oncology, National Institute of Cancer Research and Hospital, Mohakhali, Dhaka, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20252400

Keywords:

Comparative analysis, Proximal gastric cancer, Radical gastrectomy

Abstract

Background: Gastric cancer remains a significant global health burden, ranking as the fifth most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Surgical interventions like Upper Radical Gastrectomy (URG) and Total Radical Gastrectomy (TRG) are pivotal in the management of proximal gastric cancer. This study aims to compare the short-term outcomes between URG and TRG in patients with proximal gastric cancer. To evaluate and compare the immediate postoperative outcomes, including complications, gastrointestinal (GIT) functionality, nutritional status, hospital stay duration and recovery between URG and TRG in patients with proximal gastric cancer.

Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted on 67 patients diagnosed with operable proximal gastric cancer at the National Institute of Cancer Research & Hospital and National Gastro-liver Institute & Hospital, Dhaka.

Results: The study found that URG patients generally had better short-term outcomes than those undergoing TRG. URG was associated with a lower rate of immediate postoperative complications (7.14% vs. 84.62% in TRG), shorter hospital stays, superior nutritional outcome and faster recovery of gastrointestinal functionality with significantly lower mean feeding time with higher incidence of post-operative bile reflux in URG group compared to TRG group. Additionally, TRG patients exhibited higher rates of lympho-vascular invasion and node involvement, necessitating a more radical surgical approach.

Conclusions: URG may offer superior short-term outcomes compared to TRG in patients with proximal gastric cancer, particularly in terms of postoperative recovery and reduced complications.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Ilic M, Ilic I. Epidemiology of stomach cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2022;28;28(12):1187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i12.1187

Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660

Talukder MH, Jabeen S, Islam MJ, Hussain SM. Distribution of cancer patients at national institute of cancer research and hospital in 2006. Bangladesh Med J. 2008;37(1):2-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/bmj.v37i1.3599

Khil H, Kim SM, Hong S, Gil HM, Cheon E, Lee DH, et al. Time trends of colorectal cancer incidence and associated lifestyle factors in South Korea. Sci Rep. 2021;28;11(1):2413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81877-2

Kanhere H, Goel R, Finlay B, Trochsler M, Maddern G. Radical gastrectomy: still the cornerstone of curative treatment for gastric cancer in the perioperative chemotherapy Era—A single Institute experience over a decade. International J Surg Oncol. 2018;201(1):9371492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9371492

Marsh AM, Lopez JL. Gastric Resection for Malignancy. InStatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. 2024.

Zhu M, Cao B, Li X, Li P, Wen Z, Ji J, et al. Risk factors and a predictive nomogram for lymph node metastasis of superficial esophagogastric junction cancer. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;35(9):1524-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.15004

Rosa F, Quero G, Fiorillo C, Bissolati M, Cipollari C, Rausei S, et al. Total vs proximal gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma of the upper third of the stomach: a propensity-score-matched analysis of a multicentre western experience (on behalf of the Italian research group for gastric cancer–GIRCG). Gastric Cancer. 2018;21:845-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-018-0804-3

Beyer K. Surgery matters: progress in surgical management of gastric cancer. Curr Treat Opt Oncol. 2023;24(2):108-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-022-01042-3

Yoo CH, Sohn BH, Han WK, Pae WK. Long-term results of proximal and total gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma of the upper third of the stomach. Cancer research and treatment. J Korean Cancer Association. 2004;29;36(1):50-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2004.36.1.50

Harrison LE, Karpeh MS, Brennan MF. Total gastrectomy is not necessary for proximal gastric cancer. Surgery. 1998;1;123(2):127-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6060(98)70248-X

Shimada H, Suzuki T, Nakajima K, Hori S, Hayashi H, Takeda A, et al. Lymph node metastasis with adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia: clinicopathological analysis and indication for D1 dissection. International Surg. 1999;1;84(1):13-7.

Maruyama K, Gunven P, Okabayashi K, Sasako M, Kinoshita T. Lymph node metastases of gastric cancer: general pattern in 1931 patients. Ann Surg. 1989;1;210(5):596-602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-198911000-00005

Carey S, Storey D, Biankin AV, Martin D, Young J, Allman-Farinelli M. Long term nutritional status and quality of life following major upper gastrointestinal surgery–A cross-sectional study. Clinical Nut. 2011;30(6):774-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2011.03.003

Gidey K, Gidey MT, Hailu BY, Gebreamlak ZB, Niriayo YL. Clinical and economic burden of healthcare-associated infections: A prospective cohort study. Plos one. 2023;18(2):282141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282141

Huang CJ, Zhang RC, Mou YP, Zhou YC, Wang YY, Lu C, et al. Short and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A single-center experience (retrospective cohort study). International J Surg. 2018;51:109-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.01.027

Mita K, Ito H, Hashimoto M, Murabayashi R, Asakawa H, Nabetani M, et al. Postoperative complications and survival after gastric cancer surgery in patients older than 80 years of age. J Gastroint Surg. 2013;17(12):2067-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2364-5

Parry K, Haverkamp L, Bruijnen RC, Siersema PD, Offerhaus GJ, Ruurda JP, et al. Staging of adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction. European J Surg Oncol. 2016;42(3):400-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2015.11.014

Moy KA, Fan Y, Wang R, Gao YT, Yu MC, Yuan JM. Alcohol and tobacco use in relation to gastric cancer: a prospective study of men in Shanghai, China. Cancer Epidemiol, Biomark Prevent. 2010;19(9):2287-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0362

Lin JX, Huang YQ, Xie JW, Wang JB, Lu J, Chen QY, et al. Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (ACCI) is a significant factor for predicting survival after radical gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer. BMC Surg. 2019;19:1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-019-0513-9

Zhou CJ, Chen FF, Zhuang CL, Pang WY, Zhang FY, Huang DD, et al. Feasibility of radical gastrectomy for elderly patients with gastric cancer. European J Surg Oncol. 2016;42(2):303-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2015.11.013

Chen YF, Wang SY, Le PH, Chen TH, Kuo CJ, Lin CJ, et al. Prognostic significance of perineural invasion in patients with stage II/III gastric cancer undergoing radical surgery. J Personal Med. 2022;12(6):962. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12060962

Anderegg MC, Lagarde SM, Jagadesham VP, Gisbertz SS, Immanuel A, Meijer SL, et al. Prognostic significance of the location of lymph node metastases in patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. Ann Surg. 2016;264(5):847-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001767

An JY, Youn HG, Choi MG, Noh JH, Sohn TS, Kim S. The difficult choice between total and proximal gastrectomy in proximal early gastric cancer. The Am J Surg. 2008;196(4):587-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.09.040

Hübner M, Mantziari S, Demartines N, Pralong F, Coti-Bertrand P, Schäfer M. Postoperative albumin drop is a marker for surgical stress and a predictor for clinical outcome: a pilot study. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2016;2(1):8743187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8743187

Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae

Aletti GD, Dowdy SC, Podratz KC, Cliby WA. Relationship among surgical complexity, short-term morbidity and overall survival in primary surgery for advanced ovarian cancer. American J Obst Gynecol. 2007;197(6):676-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2007.10.495

Poxon V, Hogg B, Youngs D, Morris DL, Keighley MR. Incidence of bile reflux in gastric ulcer and after partial gastrectomy. British J Surg. 1986;73(4):295-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800730416

Ho KY. Clinical significance of post‐operative bile reflux gastritis. JGH Open: an Open Access J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;22;6(3):157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12726

Lee I, Oh Y, Park SH, Kwon Y, Park S. Postoperative nutritional outcomes and quality of life-related complications of proximal versus total gastrectomy for upper-third early gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. Scientific Rep. 2020;10(1):21460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78458-0

Shinohara T, Maeda Y, Koyama R, Minagawa N, Hamaguchi J, Hamada T. Feasibility and safety of early oral feeding in patients with gastric cancer after radical gastrectomy. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2020;11(1):47-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-019-00999-2

Badgwell B, Day R, Aloia T. Managing Early and Late Postoperative Complications Following Gastric Surgery. Gast Canc: Prin Pract. 2015;3:239-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15826-6_17

Forstner-Barthell AW, Murr MM, Nitecki S, Camilleri M, Prather CM, Kelly KA, et al. Near-total completion gastrectomy for severe postvagotomy gastric stasis: analysis of early and long-term results in 62 patients. J Gastro Surg. 1999;1;3(1):15-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1091-255X(99)80003-1

Downloads

Published

2025-07-30

How to Cite

Alam, M. R., Sayem, M. A., Yusuf Jamil, M. A., Alam, M. S., Islam, N. F., Rahman, M. S., & Rahman, A. (2025). Comparative analysis of short-term outcomes between upper radical and total radical gastrectomy in patients with proximal gastric cancer. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 13(8), 3309–3316. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20252400

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles