Diagnostic accuracy of rapid immunochromatographic test compared to ELISA in dengue fever

Pooja P. S.; Sandeep B. Kokate; Sunanda Shrikhande

doi:10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20252398

Authors

Pooja P. S. Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
Sandeep B. Kokate Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
Sunanda Shrikhande Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20252398

Keywords:

ELISA, Sensitivity, Specificity, IgG, Dengue fever, NS1 antigen, IgM, Rapid diagnostic test, Immunochromatographic test

Abstract

Background: Dengue fever is a significant mosquito-borne viral disease affecting tropical and subtropical regions. Early and accurate diagnosis is vital for patient care and outbreak control. While enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is considered the reference standard for dengue diagnosis, rapid immunochromatographic tests (ICTs) offer quicker, simpler alternatives suitable for point-of-care settings.

Methods: This cross-sectional study evaluated 429 clinically suspected dengue cases from July 2022 to June 2024. Serum samples were tested for NS1 antigen, IgM, and IgG antibodies using both rapid ICTs and ELISA. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated using ELISA as the gold standard.

Results: The sensitivity of ICTs for NS1 antigen, IgM, and IgG antibodies was 70.97%, 67.14%, and 68.18%, respectively. The corresponding specificities were 99.50%, 99.44%, and 99.51%. PPVs exceeded 97% for all markers, while NPVs ranged from 89.88% to 90.96%.

Conclusions: Rapid ICTs demonstrate high specificity but moderate sensitivity, supporting their use as initial screening tools. ELISA remains essential for confirmatory diagnosis, especially in cases of strong clinical suspicion.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Bhatt S, Gething PW, Brady OJ, Messina JP, Farlow AW, Moyes CL, et al. The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature. 2013;496(7446):504-7.

Pok KY, Lai YL, Sng J, Ng LC. Evaluation of nonstructural 1 antigen assays for the diagnosis and surveillance of dengue in Singapore. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases. 2010;10(10):1.

Peeling RW, Artsob H, Pelegrino JL, Buchy P, Cardosa MJ, Devi S, et al. Evaluation of diagnostic tests: dengue. Nature Rev Microbiol. 2010;8(12):S30-7.

Blacksell SD. Commercial dengue rapid diagnostic tests for point‐of‐care application: recent evaluations and future needs? BioMed Res Int. 2012;2012(1):151967.

World Health Organization. Comprehensive guideline for prevention and control of dengue and dengue haemorrhagic fever. InComprehensive Guideline for Prevention and Control of Dengue and Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever. Revised and expanded edition 2011. Available at: https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/ portal/resource/pt/who-204894. Accessed on 3 June 2025.

Gill MK, Kaur A, Kukreja S, Chhabra N. Comparative evaluation of a rapid test with ELISA for the detection of Dengue Infection. Indian J Microbiol Res. 2016;3(4):405-7.

Kalita JM, Aggarwal A, Yedale K, Gadepalli R, Nag VL. A 5‐year study of dengue seropositivity among suspected cases attending a teaching hospital of North‐Western region of India. J Med Virol. 2021;93(6):3338-43.

Dussart P, Petit L, Labeau B, Bremand L, Leduc A, Moua D, et al. Evaluation of two new commercial tests for the diagnosis of acute dengue virus infection using NS1 antigen detection in human serum. PLoS Neglected Trop Dis. 2008;2(8):e280.

Zainah S, Wahab AA, Mariam M, Fauziah MK, Khairul AH, Roslina I, et al. Performance of a commercial rapid dengue NS1 antigen immunochromatography test with reference to dengue NS1 antigen-capture ELISA. J Virolog Methods. 2009;155(2):157-60.

Shukla MK, Singh N, Sharma RK, Barde PV. Utility of dengue NS1 antigen rapid diagnostic test for use in difficult to reach areas and its comparison with dengue NS1 ELISA and qRT‐PCR. J Med Virol. 2017;89(7):1146-50.

Hang VT, Nguyet NM, Trung DT, Tricou V, Yoksan S, Dung NM, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of NS1 ELISA and lateral flow rapid tests for dengue sensitivity, specificity and relationship to viraemia and antibody responses. PLoS Neglected Trop Dis. 2009;3(1):e360.

Hunsperger EA, Yoksan S, Buchy P, Nguyen VC, Sekaran SD, Enria DA, et al. Evaluation of commercially available anti-dengue virus immunoglobulin M tests. Emerging infectious diseases. 2009;15(3):436.

Hasan SF, Akhtar R, Mustufa MA, Kazmi SU, Nadeem M. To Evaluate the Efficacy and Reliability of commonly available tests for the diagnosis of Dengue Fever in Children in Karachi. Pak J Med Res. 2013;52(3):84.

Blacksell SD, Newton PN, Bell D, Kelley J, Mammen Jr MP, Vaughn DW, et al. The comparative accuracy of 8 commercial rapid immunochromatographic assays for the diagnosis of acute dengue virus infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42(8):1127-34.

Jang WS, Kwak SY, May WL, Yang DJ, Nam J, Lim CS. Comparative evaluation of three dengue duo rapid test kits to detect NS1, IgM, and IgG associated with acute dengue in children in Myanmar. PloS one. 2019;14(3):e0213451.

Liberal V, Forrat R, Zhang C, Pan C, Bonaparte M, Yin W, et al. Performance evaluation of a dengue IgG rapid diagnostic test designed to determine dengue serostatus as part of pre-vaccination screening. Microbiol Spectrum. 2022;10(3):e00711-21.

Chakraverti TK, Sreepuram ND. Comparision of diagnostic efficacy of NS1 antigen based immunochromatographic test with immuno-sorbent assay and its role in detection of early dengue infection. J Med Dent Sci. 2012;1(6):1066-s70.

Ankush R, Qazi MS, Neha S, Zodpey SS. Seroprevalence of dengue in rural areas of Central India. Int J Scientific Res. 2023;12(1):

Raut S, Patil A. Dengue in and around Nagpur-Central India. J Evolut Med Dental Sci. 2012;1(5):853-6.

Bhattacharya N, Mukherjee H, Naskar R, Talukdar S, Das G, Pramanik N, et al. Serological diagnosis of dengue in laboratory practice in Kolkata. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2014;32(3):277-80.