The critical role of bone density in implant dentistry: a review article

Authors

  • Rohit Raghavan Department of Prosthodontics, Royal Dental College, Chalissery, Palakkad, Kerala, India
  • Shajahan P. A. Department of Prosthodontics, Royal Dental College, Chalissery, Palakkad, Kerala, India
  • B. M. Rajsree Department of Prosthodontics, Royal Dental College, Chalissery, Palakkad, Kerala, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20252818

Keywords:

Bone density, Bone-implant contact, Implant success

Abstract

Bone density is a crucial factor for the success of dental implants. A strong, dense jawbone provides the necessary foundation for the implant to fuse with the surrounding bone, a biological process called osseointegration. This direct connection between the implant and the bone is what makes it stable and ensures it lasts a long time. Without adequate bone density, which can be compromised by systemic conditions like osteoporosis or localized bone loss, the implant lacks a solid anchor. This can lead to poor primary stability, delayed healing, and a significantly higher risk of failure. To precisely assess this critical parameter, dentists rely on a classification system, such as the Misch classification, which categorizes bone quality into four distinct types, from D1 (dense cortical bone) to D4 (very fine trabecular bone). This detailed evaluation is essential as it directly informs the surgical procedure, guiding the clinician in selecting the optimal implant design and placement technique to ensure a predictable and successful outcome.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Misch CE. Available bone influences prosthodontic treatment, Dent Today. 1988;7(1):44-75.

Misch CE. Bone density: a key determinant for treatment planning. In Misch CE, editor: Contemporary implant dentistry, ed 3, St Louis. Elsevier Mosby. 2008; 130-146.

Misch CE. Bone character: second vital implant criterion. Dent Today. 1988;7:39-40.

Misch CE. Density of bone: effect on treatment plans, surgical approach, healing, and progressive loading, Int J Oral Implantol. 1990;6:23-31.

Turkyilmaz I, McGlumphy EA. Influence of bone density on implant stability parameters and implant success: a retrospective clinical study. BMC Oral Health. 2008;8:32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-8-32

Friberg B, Jemt T, Lekholm U. Early failures in 4,641 consecutively placed Branemark dental implants. A study from stage I surgery to the connection of completed prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991;6:142-6.

Jemt T, Lekholm U. Implant treatment in edentulous maxilla: a 5-year follow-up report on patients with different degrees of jaw resorption. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995;10:303-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1994.050304.x

Norton MR, Gamble C. Bone classification: an objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12:79-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012001079.x

Gomes Olieveira RC, Leles CR, Normanha LM, Lindh C, Ribeiro-Rotta RF. Assessments of trabecular bone density at implant sites on CT images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;105(2):231-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.08.007

Tumer TI, Ozbek EN, Tozum TF. Relations between the bone density from computerized tomography, and implant stability parameters: a clinical study of 230 regular platform implants. J Clin Periodontol. 2007;34:716-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01112.x

Beer A, Gahleitner A, Tschabitscher A, Homolka P. Correlation of insertion torques with bone mineral density from dental quantitative CT in the mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003;14:616-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00932.x

Hanazawa T, Sano T, Seki K, Okano T. Radiographic measurements of the mandible: a comparison between CT-reformatted and conventional tomographic images. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15:226-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00991.x

Strietzel FP, Nowak M, Kuchler I, Friedmann A. Peri-implant alveolar bone loss with respect to bone quality after use of osteotomes technique. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13:508-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130510.x

Davapanah M, Martinez H, Tecucianu JF, Hage G, Lazzara R. The modified osteotome technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2001;21:599-607.

Shapurian T, Damoulis PD, Reiser GM, Griffin TJ, Rand WM. Quantitative evaluation of bone density using the Hounsfield index. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21:290-7.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-29

How to Cite

Raghavan, R., P. A., S., & Rajsree, B. M. (2025). The critical role of bone density in implant dentistry: a review article. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 13(9), 3904–3907. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20252818

Issue

Section

Review Articles