A comparative study between onlay and sublay mesh repair in the treatment of ventral hernias

Nihar R. Thakkar; Suresh R. Harbade

doi:10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20253591

Authors

Nihar R. Thakkar Department of General Surgery, Government Medical College, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India
Suresh R. Harbade Department of General Surgery, Government Medical College, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20253591

Keywords:

Ventral hernia, Postoperative complications, Onlay mesh repair, Sublay mesh repair

Abstract

Background: Ventral hernias, characterized by a defect in the anterior abdominal wall fascia, are commonly managed surgically using mesh reinforcement. Among the widely adopted techniques, onlay and sublay mesh placements differ in anatomical location and complication profiles. Despite being routine procedures, consensus on the superior approach remains elusive. Objectives were to compare the clinical outcomes of onlay versus sublay mesh repair in patients undergoing elective ventral hernia surgery.

Methods: This was a prospective interventional comparative study conducted at a tertiary care hospital from September 2019 to July 2021. A total of 90 patients were randomly allocated to undergo either onlay (n=45) or sublay (n=45) mesh repair. Parameters compared included duration of surgery, postoperative pain (VAS scores), incidence of early complications (surgical site infection, seroma, hematoma), duration of drain placement, hospital stay, and late complications (mesh infection, bowel obstruction, recurrence). Data were statistically analyzed for significance.

Results: The mean duration of surgery was significantly longer in the sublay group, while the onlay group had a higher incidence of early postoperative complications including seroma and wound infections. The sublay group demonstrated significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay and fewer late complications.

Conclusions: Although sublay mesh repair requires a longer operative time, it is associated with fewer complications, reduced postoperative morbidity, and quicker recovery. These findings support the adoption of sublay mesh placement as the preferred method in ventral hernia repair.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Albino FP, Patel KM, Nahabedian MY, Sosin M, Attinger CE, Bhanot P. Does mesh location matter in abdominal wall reconstruction? A systematic review of the literature and a summary of recommendations. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(5):1295-304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a4c393

Ali Hussein TA. Evaluation of “sublay” versus “onlay” mesh hernioplasty in ventral hernial repair. J Pharm Sci Res. 2019;11(4):1313-8.

Dhaigude BD. Comparative evaluation of sublay versus onlay meshplasty in incisional and ventral hernias. Int Surg J. 2018;5(1):187-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20175892

Kharde K, Dogra BB, Panchabhai S,Rana KV, Sridharan S, Kalyan S. A comparative study of onlay and retrorectus mesh placement in incisional hernia repair. Med J DY Patil Univ. 2013;6:258-62.

Hafiz AS, Moiz AS, Muhammad UJ. Comparison of Sublay versus Onlay Mesh Technique of Ventral Hernia Repair. PJMHS. 2018;12(1):57.

Afridi SP, Siddiqui RA, Rajput A. Complications of Onlay and Sublay Mesh Plasty in Ventral Abdominal Hernia Repair. J Surg Pak. 2015;20(2):48-51.

Aly S, Bayumi EK. Onlay Versus Sublay Mesh Repair for Ventral Hernia. J Surg. 2015;4(1-1):1-4.

Kharde K, Dogra BB, Panchabhai S,Rana KV, Sridharan S, Kalyan S. A comparative study of onlay and retrorectus mesh placement in incisional hernia repair. Med J DY Patil Univ. 2013;6:258-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-2870.114650

Chitrambalam TG, Anguraj P, Sundaraj J, Pethuraj M. A comparative study between onlay and sublay meshplasty in ventral hernias: a randomized controlled trial. Int Surg J. 2019;6:1264-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20191260

Furat Shani Aoda, Alaa Sharif Ibrahim. Sublay versus onlay mesh repair of ventral hernia. QMJ. 2013;9:208-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28922/qmj.2013.9.16.208-216

Ibrahim AH, El-Gammal AS, Mohamed Heikal MM. Comparative study between 'onlay' and 'sublay' hernioplasty in the treatment of uncomplicated ventral hernia. Menoufia Med J. 2015;28:11-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1110-2098.155904

Venclauscas L, Maleckas A, Kiudelis M. One-year follow-up after incisional hernia treatment: results of a prospective randomized study. Hernia. 2010;14(6):575-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-010-0686-8

Demetrashvili Z, Pipia I, Loladze D, Metreveli T, Ekaladze E, Kenchadze G, et al. Open retromuscular mesh repair versus onlay technique of incisional hernia: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Surg. 2017;37:65-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.12.008

Godara R, Garg P, Raj H, Singla SL. Comparative evaluation of sublay versus onlay meshplasty in ventral hernias. Ind J Gastro. 2006;25(4):222-3.

Saber A, Emad KB. Onlay Versus Sublay Mesh Repair for Ventral Hernia. J Surg. 2015;4(1-1):1-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.s.2016040101.11

Bessa S, El-Gendi A, Ghazal A-H, Al-Fayoumi T. Comparison between the short-term results of onlay and sublay mesh placement in the management of uncomplicated para-umbilical hernia: a prospective randomized study. Hernia. 2015;19(1):141-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-013-1143-2

Milad NM, Said SM, Samir M. Comparison between onlay and retromuscular drainless mesh repair for paraumbilical hernia with divarication of recti. Kasr El Aini J Surg. 2009;10:11-6.