Shielding design and calculation of a treatment room for a 15-MV versa HD LINAC at BMU, Dhaka, Bangladesh
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20253582Keywords:
Medical LINAC, Primary barrier, Secondary barrier, Radiation shielding, Neutron protectionAbstract
Background: Effective shielding design is essential for ensuring radiation safety for both patients and healthcare staff in medical radiation therapy facilities, particularly with high-energy LINACs. This study investigates the shielding design and calculation for a 15-MV versa HD LINAC treatment room at Bangladesh Medical University (BMU), focusing on primary and secondary radiation barriers.
Methods: Shielding design and calculation were performed using empirical equations based on NCRP report no. 151 (2005). Maximum photon energy (15 MV) was considered for barrier design. Calculations for primary and secondary barrier thicknesses were performed using workload, use factor, and occupancy factor, with ordinary concrete (2.35 g/cm³) as the material. Radiation levels were measured at various gantry positions (0°, 90°, and 270°) with calibrated radiation detectors.
Results: The primary barrier thicknesses were calculated as 2.75 m for east and west sides, and 2.58 m for the roof. Secondary barrier thicknesses for the north, south, and roof sides were 1.02 m, 1.14 m, and 1.18 m, respectively. Radiation measurements at different gantry angles showed a maximum photon dose rate of 2.15 μSv/hr at the main entrance door, with values consistently below 10 μSv/hr at all locations. The standard deviation of dose rates ranged from 0.03 to 0.15 μSv/hr. Statistical analysis showed a p=0.04, indicating significant differences between radiation exposure at different gantry positions. The coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated as 0.23%, confirming low variability in the shielding performance across measurements.
Conclusions: The shielding design effectively meets safety standards, with radiation levels well below permissible limits, ensuring the safety of both hospital staff and patients.
Metrics
References
Wagner JB. Radiation Protection and Safety in Interventional Radiology. Radiol Technol. 2020;91(5):431-42.
Badawy MK, Anderson A. Radiation protection for comforters and carers in radiology and nuclear medicine. J Med Radiat Sci. 2023;70(2):103-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.683
Behr-Meenen C, von Boetticher H, Kersten JF, Nienhaus A. Radiation Protection in Interventional Radiology/Cardiology-Is State-of-the-Art Equipment Used? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(24):13131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413131
Mahmoud AA, El-Sayed AA, Aboraya AM, Fathy IN, Abouelnour MA, Nabil IM. Influence of sustainable waste granite, marble and nano-alumina additives on ordinary concretes: a physical, structural, and radiological study. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):22011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-72222-4
Pimenta A, Azevedo L, Ramos I, Santos J. Radiation protection measures used in Portuguese interventional radiology departments: A national survey. Radiography (Lond). 2023;29(3):597-603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2023.04.001
Chida K. What are useful methods to reduce occupational radiation exposure among radiological medical workers, especially for interventional radiology personnel? Radiol Phys Technol. 2022;15(2):101-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-022-00660-8
Biondi M, Bortoli E, Avitabile R, Bartoli A, Busatti E, Tozzi A, et al. Radiation shielding calculation for interventional radiology: An updated workload survey using a dose monitoring software. Phys Med. 2024;125:104509. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104509
El-Khatib AM, Abbas MI, Elzaher MA, Anas M, El Moniem MSA, Montasar M, et al. A New Environmentally Friendly Mortar from Cement, Waste Marble and Nano Iron Slag as Radiation Shielding. Materials (Basel). 2023;16(7):2541. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16072541
Elangovan A, Husain S, McGeahy P, Roumeliotis M, Wu CHD, Wolfe N, et al. Implementation of high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostatic carcinoma in an unshielded operating room facility. Brachytherapy. 2021;20(1):58-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2020.08.015
Bohrer E, Schäfer SB, Krombach GA. The new radiation protection legislation-part 2: Modifications in radiology regarding approval procedure and special fields including teleradiology. Radiologe. 2020;60(10):959-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-020-00708-z
Moghaddasi L, Colyer C. Evaluation of the effectiveness of steel for shielding photoneutrons produced in medical linear accelerators: A Monte Carlo particle transport study. Phys Med. 2022;98:53-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.04.009
Sari A. Characterization of photoneutron fluxes emitted by electron accelerators in the 4-20 MeV range using Monte Carlo codes: A critical review. Appl Radiat Isot. 2023;191:110506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110506
Benavides E, Krecioch JR, Connolly RT, Allareddy T, Buchanan A, Spelic D, et al. Optimizing radiation safety in dentistry: Clinical recommendations and regulatory considerations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2024;155(4):280-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2023.12.002
Englbrecht FS, Döpp A, Hartmann J, Lindner FH, Groß ML, Wirth HF, et al. Radiation protection modelling for 2.5 Petawatt-laser production of ultrashort x-ray, proton and ion bunches: Monte Carlo model of the Munich CALA facility. J Radiol Prot. 2020;40(4):NA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/aba8e4
Montesinos CA, Khalid R, Cristea O, Greenberger JS, Epperly MW, Lemon JA, et al. Space Radiation Protection Countermeasures in Microgravity and Planetary Exploration. Life (Basel). 2021;11(8):829. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/life11080829
Salimi E, Jalali HB, Esfandi F. Shielding design aspects of SR in 3 GeV ILSF. J Radiol Prot. 2023;43(2):NA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/acda42
Karimi AH, Mirian SF, Mahmoudi F, Geraily G, Vega-Carrillo HR, Mohiuddin M. Feasibility of 18-MV grid therapy from radiation protection aspects: unwanted dose and fatal cancer risk caused by photoneutrons and scattered photons. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022;213:106524. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106524
Ramos-Mendez J, Ortiz CR, Schuemann J, Paganetti H, Faddegon B. TOPAS simulation of photoneutrons in radiotherapy: accuracy and speed with variance reduction. Phys Med Biol. 2024;69(11):10.1088/1361-6560/ad4303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad4303
Tisi M, Mares V, Schreiber J, Englbrecht FS, Rühm W. Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation study of the secondary radiation fields at the laser-driven ion source LION. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):24418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03897-2
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
