Evaluating the safety of diverse extracorporeal membrane oxygenation technologies through the lens of intensive care unit nurses’ perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20252780Keywords:
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, ECMO, ECMO technology, ICU nurses, ICU technologyAbstract
Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a complex life-support technology increasingly utilized in intensive care units (ICUs). As ECMO devices diversify, ICU nurses are required to manage multiple platforms, posing potential challenges to care delivery and safety.
Methods: A cross-sectional, descriptive survey was conducted among ICU nurses at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh. A validated questionnaire by Kiekkas et al was used to assess perceptions of ECMO technology’s positive and negative effects on nursing care. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and inferential tests (t-tests and one-way ANOVA) examined associations between perceptions and demographic characteristics.
Results: A total of 97 ICU nurses participated. Respondents rated ECMO technology highly in enhancing patient safety (M=4.10, SD=0.92), improving nursing effectiveness (M=4.04, SD=0.97), and supporting professional development (M=4.10, SD=0.81). Negative perceptions included increased hospitalization costs (M=3.65, SD=1.16), nursing stress (M=3.35, SD=1.19), and mechanical risks (M=3.16, SD=1.19). No statistically significant differences in perceptions were observed based on gender, ICU experience, or educational level.
Conclusions: ICU nurses generally perceive ECMO technology as a positive contributor to care quality and nursing efficiency, though concerns persist regarding cost, stress, and safety. The uniformity of perceptions across demographic subgroups may reflect practical institutional training and standardized ECMO protocols. Findings highlight the importance of involving nurses in equipment evaluation, training design, and interdisciplinary collaboration to ensure patient safety and staff well-being.
Metrics
References
Geetha S 3rd, Verma N, Chakole V. A Comprehensive Review of Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation: The Lifeline in Critical Moments. Cureus. 2024;16(1):e53275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.53275
Kiekkas P, Karga M, Poulopoulou M, Karpouhtsi I, Papadoulas V, Koutsojannis C. Use of technological equipment in critical care units: nurses' perceptions in Greece. J Clin Nurs. 2006;15(2):178-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01243.x
Hernandez L, Casida J. Acute Care Nurse Practitioner-Led Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Simulation Training. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2021;32(4):461-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4037/aacnacc2021996
Ruppel H, Funk M. Nurse-Technology Interactions and Patient Safety. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2018;30(2):203-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnc.2018.02.003
Asgari P, Jackson AC, Esmaeili M, Hosseini A, Bahramnezhad F. Nurses' experience of patient care using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Nurs Crit Care. 2022;27(2):258-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.12684
Ross P, Watterson J, Fulcher BJ, Linke NJ, Nicholson AJ, Ilic D, et al. Nursing workforce, education, and training challenges to implementing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation services in Australian intensive care units: A qualitative substudy. Aust Crit Care. 2023;36(1):114-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2021.12.003
Ross P, Sheldrake J, Ilic D, Watterson J, Berkovic D, Pilcher D, et al. An exploration of intensive care nurses' perceptions of workload in providing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support: A descriptive qualitative study. Aust Crit Care. 2024;37(4):585-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2023.12.002
Salloum A, Fawaz M, Rayan A, Hamaideh SH, Hani SB, ALBashtawy M, et al. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and Lebanese Critical Care Nurses' Perceptions: A Qualitative Phenomenological Study. SAGE Open Nurs. 2023;9:23779608231216797. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608231216797
Peeler A, Gleason KT, Ferrell B, Battista V, Klinedinst R, Cho S-M, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: Opportunities for expanding nurses’ roles. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2021;32(3):341-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4037/aacnacc2021862
Alshammari MA, Vellolikalam C, Alfeeli S. Nurses’ perception of their role in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Care: A qualitative assessment. Nurs Crit Care. 2020;27(2):251-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.12538
Peek GJ, Mugford M, Tiruvoipati R, Wilson A, Allen E, Thalanany MM, et al. Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR): A multicentre randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2009;374(9698):1351-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61069-2
Combes A, Brodie D, Bartlett R, Brochard L, Brower R, Conrad S, et al. Position Paper for the organization of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation programs for acute respiratory failure in adult patients. Am J Resp Crit Care Med. 2014;190(5):488-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201404-0630CP
McGrath M. The challenges of caring in a technological environment: Critical Care Nurses’ experiences. J Clin Nurs. 2008;17(8):1096-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02050.x
Gannon WD, Craig L, Netzel L, Mauldin C, Troutt A, Warhoover M, et al. Curriculum to introduce critical care nurses to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Am J Crit Care. 2020;29(4):262-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2020739
Presti CR, Casey J. Team-based care of the patient receiving venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Dimensions Crit Care Nurs. 2025;44(1):2-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/DCC.0000000000000674
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
