Brucella abortus and Brucella melitensis infections in humans: a case series highlighting diagnostic and epidemiological profile
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20253620Keywords:
Brucellosis, Brucella abortus, Brucella melitensis, Zoonosis, Joint pain and sacroiliitisAbstract
Brucellosis is a major zoonotic infection caused by Brucella species, commonly acquired through contact with infected animals or ingestion of unpasteurized dairy products. Its varied clinical manifestations and nonspecific symptoms often delay diagnosis, complicating patient management. This case series describes the clinical, diagnostic, and epidemiological features of eight confirmed brucellosis cases from a tertiary care centre. Diagnosis was established using rose Bengal plate test (RBPT), serum agglutination test (SAT), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) IgM antibody detection, and real-time PCR. Species identification was performed through conventional PCR targeting the IS711 gene, followed by Sanger sequencing. Clinical data, laboratory findings, risk factors, co-infections, and treatment outcomes were systematically documented. Of the eight cases, five were infected with B. abortus and three with B. melitensis. Joint pain was universal, with sacroiliitis in two patients and rheumatoid arthritis in another two. Most patients had normal haematological parameters, with mildly elevated inflammatory markers (CRP, ESR). Rural exposure, livestock contact, and consumption of animal products were the predominant risk factors in B. abortus cases. In contrast, B. melitensis cases occurred in urban residents with no direct animal exposure, suggesting foodborne transmission. Three patients presented with co-infections (Leptospira, dengue, malaria and salmonella), while two patients with underlying malignancies succumbed. All were treated with doxycycline and rifampicin for six weeks, as per WHO guidelines. This series emphasizes the persistence of brucellosis in rural India and the emergence of B. melitensis in urban settings. Early diagnosis, molecular species identification, and integrated one health interventions are critical to reducing disease burden.
Metrics
References
Akoko JM, Pelle R, Lukambagire AS, Machuka EM, Nthiwa D, Mathew C, et al. Molecular epidemiology of Brucella species in mixed livestock-human ecosystems in Kenya. Scientific Rep. 2021;11(1):8881. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88327-z
Adem A, Duguma A. Characteristics, and intracellular life of Brucella organism: a review. J Microb Biochem Technol. 2020;12(3):431.
Addis M. Public health and economic importance of brucellosis: A review. Public Health. 2015;5(7):68-84.
WHO. Brucellosis 2020. Available at: https://www.who.int/newsroom/factsheets/detail/brucellosis. Accessed on 15 August 2025.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2017.
Diagnosis Management of Acute Brucellosis in Primary Care. Department of Health for Northern Ireland. Brucella Subgroup of the Northern Ireland Regional Zoonoses Group. 2004.
Qureshi KA, Parvez A, Fahmy NA, Abdel Hady BH, Kumar S, Ganguly A, et al. Brucellosis: epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment–a comprehensive review. Ann Med. 2023;55(2):2295398.
Mantur BG, Amarnath SK, Shinde RS. Review of clinical and laboratory features of human brucellosis. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2007;25(3):188-202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0255-0857(21)02105-8
Atluri VL, Xavier MN, de Jong MF, den Hartigh AB, Tsolis RM. Interactions of the human pathogenic Brucella species with their hosts. Ann Rev Microbiol. 2011;65(1):523-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-micro-090110-102905
Qureshi KA, Parvez A, Fahmy NA, Abdel Hady BH, Kumar S, Ganguly A, et al. Brucellosis: epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment-a comprehensive review. Ann Med. 2023;55(2):2295398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2023.2295398
Saavedra MJ, Fernandes C, Queiroga C. Laboratory diagnosis of brucellosis. In book: Brucellosis in goats and sheep, Publisher: Nova Science Publishers, Inc. New York, USA. 2019;151-80.
Kaltungo BY, Saidu SN, Sackey AK, Kazeem HM. A review on diagnostic techniques for brucellosis. Afr J Biotechnol. 2014;13(1):1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/963673
Solera J, Rodriguez-Zapata M, Geijo P, Largo J, Paulino J, Sáez L, et al. Doxycycline-rifampin versus doxycycline-streptomycin in treatment of human brucellosis due to Brucella melitensis. The GECMEI Group. Grupo de Estudio de Castilla-la Mancha de Enfermedades Infecciosas. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 1995;39(9):2061-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.39.9.2061
Golshani M, Buozari S. A review of brucellosis in Iran: epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, control, and prevention. Iran Biomed J. 2017;21(6):349.
Pérez-Sancho M, García-Seco T, Domínguez L. Control of Animal Brucellosis-The Most Effective Tool. Updates Brucellosis. 2015;201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/61222
Mokhtar A, Albalawi R, Fallatah SM. Brucellosis as a Multisystem Disease. InCurrent Topics in Zoonoses. IntechOpen. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.114242
Papachristodoulou E, Kakoullis L, Louppides S, Panos G. Granulomatous infective spondylitis in a patient presenting with progressive difficulty in walking: the differential between tuberculosis and brucellosis. BMJ Case Reports CP. 2019;12(11):232540. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2019-232540
Turunc T, Demiroglu YZ, Uncu H, Colakoglu S, Arslan H. A comparative analysis of tuberculous, brucellar and pyogenic spontaneous spondylodiscitis patients. J Infect. 2007;55(2):158-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2007.04.002