Comparison of early outcome of stapler versus hand sewn closure of duodenal stump after gastrectomy in gastric cancer
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20253575Keywords:
Gastric cancer, Gastrectomy, Duodenal stump closure, Stapler versus hand-sewn, Postoperative outcomesAbstract
Background: Gastric cancer (GC) remains a major global health challenge, ranking as the fifth most common malignancy and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Surgery with gastrectomy remains the mainstay of curative treatment, but duodenal stump leakage (DSL) continues to be one of the most feared postoperative complications, associated with high morbidity and mortality. The choice between stapled and hand-sewn duodenal stump closure remains a debated topic, especially in resource-limited regions such as South Asia, where cost and accessibility are critical factors. The study aimed to compare the early outcomes of stapler versus hand-sewn closure of the duodenal stump after gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients.
Methods: This prospective comparative study included 40 gastric cancer patients undergoing elective gastrectomy, divided into stapler (n=20) and hand-sewn (n=20) duodenal stump closure groups. The study was conducted at Sylhet MAG Osmani Medical College and Hospital, Sylhet, Bangladesh, from July 2024 to June 2025. Patients with ASA class III–IV or prior neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. Standardised operative and postoperative protocols were followed, and outcomes assessed included operative time, closure time, complications, hospital stay, and cost. Data were analysed using statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) 26 with t-test, Chi-square, and multivariable logistic regression, considering p<0.05 as significant.
Results: Both groups were comparable in baseline demographics and type of gastrectomy. Stapler closure significantly reduced operative time (158±22 versus 177±25 min, p=0.007) and stump closure time (9±3 versus 18±5 min, p<0.001). Early postoperative complications, including duodenal stump blowout, were slightly lower in the stapler group but not statistically significant. Recovery was faster with stapler closure, with earlier oral intake (2.7±0.9 versus 3.8±1.2 days, p=0.009) and shorter hospital stay (8.2±2.0 versus 10.1±2.5 days, p=0.026). Stapler procedures incurred higher costs (p=0.01).
Conclusion: Stapled duodenal stump closure after gastrectomy offers faster surgery, earlier recovery, and shorter hospital stay than hand-sewn closure, without added complications. Despite higher costs, it represents a safe and effective option in selected gastric cancer patients.
Metrics
References
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660
Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Parkin DM, Piñeros M, Znaor A, et al. Cancer statistics for the year 2020: An overview. Int J Cancer. 2021;149(4):778-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.33588
Shin WS, Xie F, Chen B, Yu P, Yu J, To KF, et al. Updated epidemiology of gastric cancer in Asia: decreased incidence but still a big challenge. Cancers. 2023;15(9):2639. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15092639
Mousavi SE, Ilaghi M, Elahi Vahed I, Nejadghaderi SA. Epidemiology and socioeconomic correlates of gastric cancer in Asia: results from the GLOBOCAN 2020 data and projections from 2020 to 2040. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):6529. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-90064-6
Rawla P, Barsouk A. Epidemiology of gastric cancer: global trends, risk factors and prevention. Gastroenterol Rev. 2019;14(1):26-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/pg.2018.80001
Ilic M, Ilic I. Epidemiology of stomach cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2022;28(12):1187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i12.1187
Pourhoseingholi MA, Vahedi M, Baghestani AR. Burden of gastrointestinal cancer in Asia; an overview. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2015;8(1):19.
Sarker MA, Rahman MM, Islam MJ, Nuruzzaman AK, Sultana M. Socio-Demographic and Clinicopathological Features of Gastric Cancer: A Study of 114 Cases. J Chittagong Med College Teachers' Assoc. 2016;27(1):51-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/jcmcta.v27i1.62284
Kannan D, Venkatesh S, Kumar AM. Gastric Carcinoma-The Indian Perspective. Gastroenterol Hepatol Endos Prac. 2024;4(4):161-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ghep.ghep_18_24
Fico V, Tropeano G, Brisinda G. Current standards of lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer. Updates Surg. 2024;76(1):319-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-023-01689-z
Gu L, Zhang K, Shen Z, Wang X, Zhu H, Pan J, et al. Risk factors for duodenal stump leakage after laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Gastric Cancer. 2020;20(1):81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2020.20.e4
Kim MC. Incidence and prognosis of duodenal stump leakage in laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer according to treating duodenal stump. World J Surg Surgical Res. 2020;1211.
Bangaru H, Veitla RM, Pigilam M, Kunwargiri GK. Comparative study between staplers and conventional (hand-sewn) anastomosis in gastrointestinal surgery. Indian J Surg. 2012;74(6):462-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-012-0450-7
Biswas AK, Mahmud F, Siddique AB, Ahmed SU, Taher MA, Kibria CS. Hand Sewn versus Stapled Closure of Duodenal Stump after Gastric Resection. Mymensingh Med J. 2020;29(3):652-8.
Aral Orhan C, Uprak TK, Coskun M, Yapici HB, Yegen SC. Factors Affecting Duodenal Stump Leakage After Gastrectomy. Bratislava Med J. 2025;1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44411-025-00166-w
Yo LS, Consten EC, Quarles van Ufford HM, Gooszen HG, Gagner M. Buttressing of the staple line in gastrointestinal anastomoses: overview of new technology designed to reduce perioperative complications. Digestive Surg. 2007;23(5-6):283-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000096648
Biswas AK, Mahmud F, Siddique AB, Ahmed SU, Taher MA, Kibria CS. Hand Sewn versus Stapled Closure of Duodenal Stump after Gastric Resection. Mymensingh Med J. 2020;29(3):652-8.
Kshirsagar VV, Himashree MP. A Comparative Study of Hand-Sewn and Stapled Anastomosis in Gastrointestinal Surgeries. Cureus. 2024;16(10). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.71264
Schineis C, Fenzl T, Aschenbrenner K, Lobbes L, Stroux A, Weixler B, et al. Stapled intestinal anastomoses are more cost effective than hand-sewn anastomoses in a diagnosis related group system. The Surgeon. 2021;19(6):321-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2020.09.002
Lee SH, Lee YH, Hur YH, Kim HJ, Choi BG. A comparative study of postoperative outcomes after stapled versus handsewn gastrojejunal anastomosis for pylorus-resecting pancreaticoduodenectomy. Annals Hepato-biliary-pancreatic Surg. 2021;25(1):84-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.2021.25.1.84
He H, Li H, Ye B, Liu F. Single purse-string suture for reinforcement of duodenal stump during laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Front Oncol. 2019;9:1020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.01020
Uprak TK, Ekdal DC, Ergenç M, Attaallah W. Hand-sewn versus Stapled Anastomosis for Billroth II Gastrojejunostomy After Distal Gastrectomy: Comparison of Short-term Outcomes. Istanbul Med J. 2023;31.
Zizzo M, Ugoletti L, Manzini L, Castro Ruiz C, Nita GE, Zanelli M, et al. Management of duodenal stump fistula after gastrectomy for malignant disease: a systematic review of the literature. BMC Surg. 2019;19(1):55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-019-0520-x
Ri M, Hiki N, Ishizuka N, Ida S, Kumagai K, Nunobe S, et al. Duodenal stump reinforcement might reduce both incidence and severity of duodenal stump leakage after laparoscopic gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction for gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2019;22(5):1053-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-019-00946-8
Orsenigo E, Bissolati M, Socci C, Chiari D, Muffatti F, Nifosi J, et al. Duodenal stump fistula after gastric surgery for malignancies: a retrospective analysis of risk factors in a single centre experience. Gastric Cancer. 2014;17(4):733-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-013-0327-x