Publish or perish: exploring nurse academicians’ perspectives on academic publishing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20253977Keywords:
Nurse academicians, Academic publishing, Concept analysis, Mentorship, Research capacityAbstract
Academic publishing is a vital component of nursing scholarship, essential for faculty promotion, knowledge dissemination, and international recognition. Despite its importance, nurse academicians face multiple challenges such as limited mentorship, heavy workloads, language barriers, and financial constraints that impede scholarly engagement. This study aimed to clarify the concept of nurse academicians’ perspectives on academic publishing using Walker and Avant’s eight-step concept analysis framework. A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and Web of Science for studies published between 2015 and 2024. Both MeSH terms and free-text keywords were used, and fifteen empirical studies met the inclusion criteria. Data were extracted and appraised using a 15-item quality checklist, with findings synthesized into defining attributes, antecedents, consequences, and empirical referents. Three key attributes emerged: motivational drivers (career advancement, scholarly identity), barriers (workload, language difficulties, financial constraints, predatory publishing), and facilitators (mentorship, institutional support, collaboration). Antecedents included research competence, supportive culture, and funding availability. Consequences encompassed enhanced productivity and recognition but also risks such as burnout and unethical practices. Empirical referents such as publication count, H-index, and faculty surveys provided measurable indicators. A model case illustrated how mentorship, motivation, and resources interact to shape publishing perspectives. In conclusion, this analysis distinguishes perspectives from mere productivity, offering conceptual clarity and practical insights. Strengthening mentorship, redistributing workloads, providing writing and language support, and ensuring financial assistance are crucial for enhancing scholarly publishing in nursing. These findings inform institutional policy, nursing education, and global research collaboration.
Metrics
References
Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2021. Available at: https://www.wolterskluwer.com/en/solutions/ovid/nursing-research-9781975141899. Accessed on 17 January 2025.
Burns N, Grove SK. The practice of nursing research: appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence. 9th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2020. Available at: https://www.elsevier.com/books/the-practice-of-nursing-research/grove/978-0-323-49733-7. Accessed on 17 January 2025.
Salmond SW, Echevarria M. Healthcare transformation and changing roles for nursing. Orthop Nurs. 2017;36(1):12–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/NOR.0000000000000308
Chinn PL, Kramer MK. Integrated theory and knowledge development in nursing. 9th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2018. Available at: https://www.elsevier.com/books/integrated-theory-and-knowledge-development-in-nursing/chinn/978-0-323-39894-8. Accessed on 17 January 2025.
Melnyk BM, Fineout-Overholt E. Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: a guide to best practice. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2022. Available at: https://shop.lww.com/Evidence-Based-Practice-in-Nursing---Healthcare/p/9781975185725. Accessed on 17 January 2025.
Whittemore R, Knafl K. The integrative review: updated methodology. J Adv Nurs. 2005;52(5):546–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x
Clark AM, Thompson DR, Watson R. Nurses and academic publishing: who, what, where, when, why and how? J Adv Nurs. 2012;68(6):1205–6.
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 Sep 18]. Available aat: http://www.icmje.org. Accessed on 17 January 2025.
Rodgers BL. Concept analysis: an evolutionary view. In: Rodgers BL, Knafl KA, editors. Concept development in nursing: foundations, techniques, and applications. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2000:77–102.
Smith RL, Thomas M, Jackson P. Motivation for academic publishing among nursing faculty: a mixed-method study. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2020;41(2):101–7.
Lee H, Kim J, Yoon S. Academic publishing challenges in nursing: a global perspective. BMC Nurs. 2019;18:35.
Watson R. The importance of publishing nursing research internationally. J Clin Nurs. 2017;26(19–20):3055–6.
Patel P, Gupta N, Sharma A. Barriers to research and publication in nursing education: a cross-sectional study. Indian J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2021;8(4):219–25.
Khan A, Malik S, Rahman F. Mentorship as a tool for research capacity building in nursing: a review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020;104:103536.
Brown CE, Kim SC, Mitchell PH. Language barriers in academic writing: challenges for non-native English-speaking nurses. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2019;51(3):287–94.
Taylor D, Boushey CJ. Mentorship models for improving research and publication outcomes. Nurs Educ Today. 2018;65:37–42.
White D, Leary A. Facilitating nursing research collaborations across institutions. Nurs Outlook. 2017;65(2):228–34.
Rao TS, Vohra A, Manohar N. Predatory publishing: how to protect yourself and your research. Indian J Psychiatry. 2021;63(4):315–8.
Davis B, William K, Rogers L. Building a research culture: strategies for academic institutions. J Prof Nurs. 2016;32(3):183–9.
Melnyk BM, Fineout-Overholt E, Gallagher-Ford L, Kaplan L. The state of evidence-based practice in US nurses: critical implications for nurse leaders and educators. J Nurs Adm. 2012;42(9):410–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0b013e3182664e0a
Clark L, Watson R, Thompson DR. Barriers to publishing in nursing: findings from a global scoping review. J Clin Nurs. 2022;31(3–4):315–23.
Chen X, Zhang L. Evaluating institutional support for nursing research: a global comparison. Nurs Health Sci. 2020;22(1):40–8.
Lee T, Koo Y, Park J. Workload and scholarly productivity among nursing faculty: a multi-country study. Int Nurs Rev. 2019;66(2):165–73.
Deci EL, Ryan RM. Self-determination theory: basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: Guilford Press; 2017. Available at: https://www.guilford.com/books/Self-Determination-Theory/Edward-Deci/Richard-Ryan/9781462528769. Accessed on 17 January 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1521/978.14625/28806
Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall; 1986.
Whitehead D, LoBiondo-Wood G, Haber J. Nursing and midwifery research: methods and appraisal for evidence-based practice. 6th ed. Sydney: Elsevier; 2022. Available at: https://www.elsevier.com/books/nursing-and-midwifery-research/whitehead/978-0-7295-4233-2. Accessed on 17 January 2025.
Zanchetta MS, Schwind JK, Aksenchuk K, Gorospe FF, Santiago L. An international mentorship program for academic nurses: building scholarly capacity. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2017;49(2):192–201.
Grossman S, Valiga TM. The new leadership challenge: creating the future of nursing. 6th ed. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis; 2021. Available at: https://fadavis.com/product/nursing-leadership-new-challenges-grossman-6. Accessed on 17 January 2025.
Gough D, Oliver S, Thomas J. An introduction to systematic reviews. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications; 2017. Available at: https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/an-introduction-to-systematic-reviews/book245950. Accessed on 17 January 2025.
Davis DS. Authorship ethics in academic publishing: perspectives for nursing faculty. Nurs Ethics. 2020;27(3):751–9.
Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Ethical guidelines for peer reviewers [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 Sep 18]. Available at: https://publicationethics.org. Accessed on 17 January 2025.
World Health Organization. Global strategic directions for nursing and midwifery 2021–2025. Geneva: WHO; 2021. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240033863. Accessed on 17 January 2025.
Scott PA, MacIntyre TE, Houghton C. The global nursing shortage and workforce planning: policy implications. J Nurs Manag. 2020;28(8):1814–21.
Institute of Medicine (IOM). The future of nursing: leading change, advancing health. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011.
Jones R, MacGillivray S, Kroll T. International collaborations in nursing research: challenges and opportunities. Int J Nurs Stud. 2017;74:21–9.
Wiley SR, Greco KE. Language and access inequities in nursing publication. Adv Nurs Sci. 2018;41(3):213–22.
Johnson JL, Adkins D, Chauvin S. Barriers to research participation among nursing faculty: a qualitative study. J Nurs Educ. 2018;57(1):7–13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20191223-03
Drenkard K, Swartwout E, Cole D. Continuous professional development and scholarly engagement: challenges and future directions. J Nurs Adm. 2021;51(4):187–92.
Peters MDJ, Godfrey CM, McInerney P, Khalil H, Parker D. The Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers’ manual 2015: methodology for JBI scoping reviews. Adelaide: JBI; 2015. Available at: https://jbi.global/scoping-review-methodology. Accessed on 17 January 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-24-09
Smith MJ, Zsohar H. Research trajectory mapping: exploring scholarly growth among nursing faculty. Nurs Outlook. 2017;65(4):443–50.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
