Diagnostic value of cerebrospinal fluid markers and clinical profiles in distinguishing tuberculous from pyogenic meningitis: a cross-sectional study

Authors

  • Arun Baraguru Rangashamaiah Department of Neurosurgeon, The Health City Hospital, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Ajay Department of Surgical Oncology, Neurosurgery, Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital and Research Centre Mullanpur New Chandigarh, Punjab
  • Prachi Gang Department of Neurosurgery, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20260616

Keywords:

Tuberculous meningitis, Pyogenic meningitis, Cerebrospinal fluid, Adenosine deaminase, Lactate, Protein electrophoresis, Diagnostic markers

Abstract

Background: Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) and pyogenic meningitis (PM) are significant etiologies of central nervous system infections necessitating immediate and precise differentiation owing to their distinct treatment protocols and prognostic outcomes. The similar symptoms of these two types of meningitis often make it hard to diagnose them early.

Methods: This cross-sectional study (CSS) assessed cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) markers and clinical profiles in patients diagnosed with TBM and PM. We looked at the cytological parameters, protein, glucose, adenosine deaminase (ADA), and lactate levels in the CSF. We also did electrophoretic protein fractionation. Clinical data and neuroimaging results were documented to discern distinguishing characteristics.

Results: TBM cases exhibited lymphocytic pleocytosis, elevated ADA levels, increased protein-glucose ratios, and heightened gamma globulin fractions on electrophoresis. On the other hand, PM showed a lot of neutrophils, a lot of CSF lactate, and more alpha globulin fractions. Hydrocephalus and cranial nerve involvement were more prevalent in TBM. These parameters exhibited high sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing TBM from PM.

Conclusion: The combination of CSF biochemical markers, cytological profiles, electrophoretic patterns, and clinical features improves the accuracy of diagnosing TBM and PM. This multiparametric method is very useful in places where resources are limited because it helps people get the right treatment at the right time to improve their health.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Shekhar R, Rao JR, Devi KA, Rao RB. CSF proteins as discriminatory markers of tubercular and pyogenic meningitis. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(8):1586-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2013/6361.3226

Imron A, Hermanto Y, Rizal A, Yunivita V, Ruslami R. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis in tuberculous meningitis: a literature review. Surg Neurol Int. 2025;16:246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_1131_2024

Olie SE, Staal SL, Ter Horst L, van Zeggeren IE, Man WK, Tanck MWT. Diagnostic accuracy of inflammatory markers in adults with suspected central nervous system infections. J Infect. 2024;88(3):106117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2024.01.016

Qamar FN, Rahman AJ, Iqbal S, Humayun K. Comparison of clinical and CSF profiles in children with tuberculous and pyogenic meningitis; role of CSF protein: glucose ratio as diagnostic marker of tuberculous meningitis. J Pak Med Assoc. 2013;63(2):206-10.

Song J, Kim SH, Jung YR, Choe J, Kang CI, Min JH. 10-year retrospective review of the etiologies for meningitis with elevated adenosine deaminase in cerebrospinal fluid: etiologies other than TB. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12:858724. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2022.858724

Baran JM, Porębska A, Lesisz M, Polak K, Grodzka O, Domitrz I. Investigating blood biomarkers that can facilitate the diagnosis of meningitis-a systematic literature review. Int J Mol Sci. 2025;26(4):1427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26041427

Israni AV, Dave DA, Mandal A, Singh A. Tubercular meningitis in children: clinical, pathological, and radiological profile and factors associated with mortality. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2016;7(3):400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-3147.181475

Radhakrishna G, Kumar A, Krishna GK. Estimation of cerebrospinal fluid lactate level to differentiate between pyogenic and non-pyogenic meningitis: a prospective analytical study. Int J Adv Med. 2020;7(11):1664–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20204517

Asuti S, Jagadish G, Narayan A. Estimation of CSF lactate as a diagnostic marker to differentiate pyogenic meningitis from nonpyogenic meningitis. IP Indian J Neurosci. 2019;5(3):106-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijn.2019.015

Hammami F, Koubaa M, Chakroun A, Rekik K, Feki W. Comparative analysis between tuberculous meningitis and other forms of extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Germs. 2021;11(1):23-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18683/germs.2021.1237

Rashid M, Mushtaq S, Manzoor J, Bhat JA, Chaman S, Hamid A. Comparative analysis of cerebrospinal fluid adenosine deaminase levels in infective meningitis of different aetiologies. Int J Contemp Pediat. 2017;4(2):608–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20170718

Mahale RR, Mehta A, Uchil S. Estimation of cerebrospinal fluid cortisol level in tuberculous meningitis. J Neuro Rural Pract. 2015;6(4):541. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-3147.165421

Downloads

Published

2026-02-26

How to Cite

Rangashamaiah, A. B., Ajay, & Gang, P. (2026). Diagnostic value of cerebrospinal fluid markers and clinical profiles in distinguishing tuberculous from pyogenic meningitis: a cross-sectional study. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 14(3), 996–1000. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20260616

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles