Study of compliance of crash carts to standards in the emergency of a tertiary care teaching hospital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20162917Keywords:
Crash cart, Resuscitation, Standardization, Customization, Human factor engineeringAbstract
Background: The successful management of cardiopulmonary emergencies revolves around the optimum utilization of the golden hour, so that the patient gets the best possible advantage at survival. Aim of the study was to perform gap analysis of crash carts in the emergency of a tertiary care teaching hospital by comparing the salient parameters with standards listed by Resuscitation Council UK (for equipment) and National Accreditation Board of Hospitals and health care providers (for management of medication). Further, to assess the improvement in compliance with the simple intervention of educating staff regarding protocols.
Methods: A descriptive, quantitative, observational study, supplemented in the second phase by an intervention to increase awareness of staff in achieving standardization, followed further by assessing the level of improvement in compliance to standards in terms of content, labeling, documentation and functionality of the contents of the carts.
Results: The root causes of non-adherence to standardization were design of the area and of the cart, amount of workload which led to neglect of labelling, documentation protocols resulting in decreased accountability and inefficient monitoring. This impacted the adequate provision of content and functionality of the items in the crash carts. Human factor engineering in the form of customization of crash carts for cognitive ergonomic design, clarity and awareness of guidelines among the nursing staff i.e. ‘first responder’ went a long way in improving compliance to standards.
Conclusions: Human factor engineering supplemented by usage of sub-trolleys, along with increasing sensitivity and awareness to standard protocols, can help achieve maximum compliance in terms of the effective functioning of crash carts in the emergency.
Metrics
References
Vukmir RB. Survival from prehospital cardiac arrest is critically dependent upon response time. Resuscitation. 2006;69(2):229-34.
Telesca K. A simplistic approach to restocking crash carts. Hosp Pharm. 1992;27(12):1068-70,1072.
Benhamou-Jantelet G, Héron L, Berrebi D, Veyer K. Emergency crash cart and its use in an academic medical center. Soins. 2007;714:35.
Arkwright TW. A hospital-wide crash cart program. Hosp Mater Manage Q. 1985;7(2):12-21.
Cranswick PJ, Rodda M. Box Hill Hospital resuscitation trolley. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1998;26(2):189-92.
Begg JE. A pediatric care and resuscitation cart: one community hospital’s ED experience. J Emerg Nurs. 1995;21(6):555-9.
Calvo Macías C, López-Herce Cid J, Carrillo Alvarez A, Burón Martínez E. Material for the pediatric resuscitation trolley. An Pediatr (Barc). 2007;66(1):51-4.
Nguyen BT. Prise en charge et gestion des cabarets de réanimation par le département de pharmacie. Pharmactuel. 2003;36(1):42-4.
Hand H, Banks A. The contents of the resuscitation trolley [published correction appears in Nurs Stand. 2004; 18(47):31]. Nurs Stand. 2004;18(44):43-52. 10.
Remote Health Atlas, 2007, ‘Resuscitation trolley’ viewed 16 February 2012 from http://remote healthatlas.nt.gov.au/ resuscitation_ trolley.pdf.
Reprinted article -©2010 Pennsylvania Patient Safety Authority Pennsylvania Patient Safety Advisory. 2010;7(2—June).
Shannon Keen. What Are the Contents of an Emergency Cart? [Homepage on the internet]. 1999 [cited 2012 march 4].available from: http://www.ehow.com/ facts_7244281_contents-emergency-cart_.html
Hogh L, Kane L, Bhalla A, Ward MC. Variations in the provision of resuscitation equipment: survey of acute hospitals’. Postgraduate Medical Journal. 2005;81(1956):409-10.
Gabbot D, Smith G, Mitchell S, Colquhoun M, Nolan J, Soar J, et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation standards for clinical practice and training in the United Kingdom’, Accident and Emergency Nursing. 2005;13(3):171-9.
Australian college for emergency medicine. Guidelines on emergency department design [homepage on the internet]. 2002 [cited 2012 march 1]. Available from: http://www.acem.org.au/ media/ policies_and_guidelines/ G15_ED_Design.pd.
Jevon P. Standards for clinical practice and staff training in CPR’, Nursing Times. 2004;100(47):28-9.
NABH-Accreditation Standards for Hospitals, 3rd edition.
Process Step Potential Failure Modes Potential Effect on Patient Criticality Root Causes Prevention Strategies. 2002.
Colquhoun M, Gabbot D, Mitchell S. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidance for clinical practice and training in primary care’, Resuscitation Council (UK) viewed 21 February 2012, from http://www.resus.org.uk.
National Patient Safety Agency of the UK (NPSA), 2008, ‘Treatment for safety: why we need it. How do we do it’, viewed 15 May 2009, from http://www.npsa.nhs.uk/ patient safety/human factors/team working.
Patient Safety Bulletin 1. Rapid Learning from reported incidents. NPSA, London July 2005.
Rajeswaran L, Ehlers VJ. Audits of emergency trolleys’ contents in selected hospitals in Botswana’, Health SA Gesondheid 17(1), Art. #621, 7 pages. http:// dx.doi.org/10.4102/hsag. v17i1.621. 2012.
Desalu L, Kushimo O, Akinlaja O. Adherence to CPR guidelines during peri- operative cardiac arrest in a developing country. Resuscitation. 2006;69(3):517-20.
Nursing Practice Educator Resuscitation. Nurs Times. 230714(30).
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society December 2011;53:6626-36.
Ghonaimy S, Khedr Y, Boraei A. Emergency trolleys: available and maintained but are their locations known? 2013.
Nolan G, Soar J. guidelines for the Provision of Anesthetic Services. 2013.
Resuscitation Guidelines 2010. Resuscitation Council (UK).http://www.resus.org.uk/ resuscitation-guidelines/.
Dyson E, Smith GB. Common faults in resuscitation equipment – guidelines for checking equipment and drugs used in adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2002;55:137-49.
Smith A, Kinross J, Bailey M, Aggarwal R, Toresen, D, Vincent C. Restocking the resuscitation trolley: how good is compliance with checking procedures’? Clinical Risk. 2008;14(1):4-7.