Observational study of use of harmonic scalpel vs electrocautery in dissection and removal of gallbladder from gallbladder bed in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Authors

  • Rohan Shrotri BJ Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20260950

Keywords:

Electrocautery, Harmonic scalpel, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Surgical outcomes

Abstract

Background: The harmonic scalpel uses ultrasonic vibrations at a high frequency to cut tissue and coagulate blood vessels. Electrocautery uses electrical current to generate heat, which cuts tissue and coagulates blood vessels. Both energy sources are used for dissection of gallbladder with each having their own merits and demerits.

 Objectives: To assess the outcomes and complications of using harmonic Scalpel vs electrocautery for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Methods: Observational retrospective study, conducted at a tertiary healthcare center (Sassson General Hospital, Pune). Data collection over 24 months (December 2022-December 2024), enrolled 100 patients diagnosed with cholelithiasis. The key outcomes measured - the average operating time, the average frequency of lens cleaning, the average VAS score on POD 1, the average length of stay postoperatively, duration of drain and number of complications.

Results: The average operating time using electrocautery vs harmonic scalpel was 55.67 vs 41.52 minutes, average frequency of lens cleaning  5 vs 3.24 times, average VAS score on post operative day 1 to be 4.321 vs 3.264,average length of stay post-surgery  to be 3.58 vs 2.38 days ,average duration of drain to be 2.681 vs 2.324 days ,number of gallbladder perforations to be 5 vs 2.

Conclusions: The harmonic scalpel demonstrated improved patient outcomes for operating time, length of stay, duration of drain, drainage volume, postoperative pain and overall complications compared to electrocautery.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Minutolo V, Gagliano G, Rinzivillo C, Li Destri G, Carnazza M, Minutolo O. Usefullness of the ultrasonically activated scalpel in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: our experience and review of literature. G Chir. 2008;29(5):242-5.

Ramzanali SA, Zia-ul-Islam, Shah SS. Monopolar electrocautery versus ultrasonic dissection of the gallbladder from the gallbladder bed in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2013;25(3):16-8.

Kannan A, Tara A, Quadir H, Hakobyan K, Gaddam M, Ojinnaka U, et al. The outcomes of the patients undergoing harmonic scalpel laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cureus. 2021;13(6):15622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.15622

Jain K, Goyal D. Comparative analysis of monopolar electrocautery and ultrasonic activated scalpel in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comprehensive evaluation using clinical, laboratory and imaging techniques. Cureus. 2024;16(6):61925. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.61925

Sasi W. Dissection by ultrasonic energy versus monopolar electrosurgical energy in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS. 2010;14(1):23-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4293/108680810X12674612014383

Janssen IM, Swank DJ, Boonstra O, Knipscheer BC, Klinkenbijl JH, van Goor H. Randomized clinical trial of ultrasonic versus electrocautery dissection of the gallbladder in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2003;90(7):799-803. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4128

El Nakeeb A, Askar W, El Lithy R. Clipless laparoscopic cholecystectomy using the Harmonic scalpel for cirrhotic patients: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2536-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-0999-9

Singh, A. N., Kilambi, R. Single-stage laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus two-stage endoscopic stone extraction followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with gallbladder stones with common bile duct stones: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials with trial sequential analysis. Surg Endosc. 2018;32:3763-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6170-8

Tsimoyiannis EC, Tsimogiannis KE, Pappas-Gogos G. Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1842-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-0887-3

Bessa SS, Abdel-Razek AH, Sharaan MA, Bassiouni AE, El-Khishen MA, El-Kayal ESA. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in cirrhotics: a prospective randomized study comparing the conventional diathermy and the harmonic scalpel for gallbladder dissection. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011;21(1):1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2010.0255

Francesca G, Pasquale P, Massimiliano T. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Risk factors for postoperative intra-abdominal abscess. J Laparoendos Adv Surg Techn. 2016;26(1):28–32.

Jayne DG, Foster ME, Guillou PJ. Harmonic scalpel versus conventional diathermy in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective randomized trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2002;6(6):812-5.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-30

How to Cite

Shrotri, R. (2026). Observational study of use of harmonic scalpel vs electrocautery in dissection and removal of gallbladder from gallbladder bed in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 14(4), 1441–1446. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20260950

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles