Comparison of puncture outcome between prolonged occlusion flow mediated dilatation method and conventional method during distal radial artery cannulation in coronary intervention
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20260934Keywords:
Distal radial approach, Prolong occlusion flow mediated dilatation, ComplicationAbstract
Background: Distal transradial access is increasingly used for coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but radial artery cannulation can be technically demanding due to a steeper learning curve and smaller vessel caliber. Prolonged occlusion flow-mediated dilatation (PO-FMD) is a novel technique that may enhance distal radial artery (DRA) access by promoting vasodilatation. Aim was to compare the efficacy and vascular access-site complications of PO-FMD versus the conventional technique during distal transradial artery cannulation.
Methods: This cross-sectional analytic study was conducted at the department of cardiology, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD), Dhaka, from March 2021 to February 2022. A total of 200 purposively selected patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing CAG with or without PCI via distal radial access were enrolled. Participants divided into 2 groups: Group I (PO-FMD, n=100) and II (conventional method, n=100). Efficacy outcomes included access time, procedural time, number of attempts, 1st-attempt success rate, and crossover rate. Vascular access-site complications such as hematoma, radial artery spasm, and radial artery occlusion were also assessed.
Results: Crossover to another access site was significantly lower in group I compared to group II (5% vs. 15%, p=0.030). Access time was shorter with PO-FMD (58.8±10.1 seconds vs. 78.9±7.9 seconds; p=0.006). Group I demonstrated fewer attempts and a higher first-attempt success rate (p=0.015 and p=0.021, respectively). Radial artery spasm and occlusion were significantly reduced in the PO-FMD group (p=0.048 and p=0.039). No significant differences were observed in hematoma formation or total procedural time.
Conclusions: PO-FMD-mediated radial artery dilatation appears to be a safer and more effective technique than the conventional method for DRA cannulation.
Metrics
References
Islam AKMM, Majumder AAS. Coronary artery disease in Bangladesh: a review. Indian Heart J. 2013;65(4):424-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2013.06.004
Bertrand OF. Acute forearm muscle swelling post transradial catheterization and compartment syndrome: prevention is better than treatment. Catheterizat Cardiovascular Intervent. 2010;75(3):366-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.22448
Seldinger SI. Catheter replacement of the needle in percutaneous arteriography; a new technique’, Acta radiologica. 1953;39(5):368-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/00016925309136722
Campeau L. Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography. Catheterizat Cardiovascul Diagn. 1989;16(1):3-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.1810160103
Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerken D, Slagboom T, van der Wieken R. A Randomized Comparison of Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty by the Radial, Brachial and Femoral Approaches: The Access Study. J Am College Cardiol. 1997;29(6):1269-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(97)00064-8
Eeckhout E. Handbook of complications during percutaneous cardiovascular interventions, Informa Healthcare, Abingdon. 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780367800109
Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning AP, Benedetto U, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Europ Heart J. 2019;40(2):87-165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy855
Aoun J, Hattar L, Dgayli K, Wong G, Bhat T. Update on complications and their management during transradial cardiac catheterization. Expert Rev Cardiovascular Therapy. 2019;17(10):741-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14779072.2019.1675510
Uddin MJ, Hashem S, Momen A, Sarker S, Rahman AU, Hasan M, et al. Right Distal Radial Artery Access for Coronary Intervention: Initial Experience in Bangladesh. J Am College Cardiol. 2019;73(15):S72-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.452
Koutouzis M, Kontopodis E, Tassopoulos A, Tsiafoutis I, Katsanou K, Rigatou A, et al. Distal Versus Traditional Radial Approach for Coronary Angiography. Cardiovascular Revascularizat Med. 2019;20(8):678-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2018.09.018
Matsuzawa Y, Kwon TG, Lennon RJ, Lerman LO, Lerman A. Prognostic Value of Flow-Mediated Vasodilation in Brachial Artery and Fingertip Artery for Cardiovascular Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Am Heart Associat. 2015;4:11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.115.002270
Fathi R, Marwick TH. Noninvasive tests of vascular function and structure: why and how to perform them. Am Heart J. 2001;141(5):694-703. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1067/mhj.2001.114972
Mullen PE, Pathé M, Purcell R. The management of stalkers. Adv Psychiatric Treatm. 2001;7(5):335-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/apt.7.5.335
Doubell J, Kyriakakis C, Weich H, Herbst P, Pecoraro A, Moses J, et al. Radial artery dilatation to improve access and lower complications during coronary angiography: the RADIAL trial. Euro Intervention. 2021;16(16):1349-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00207
Hoque MAA, Pradhan B, Ahmed N, Roy S. Tropical cyclone risk assessment using geospatial techniques for the eastern coastal region of Bangladesh. Sci Total Environment. 2019;692:10-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.132
Doubell MJ, Spencer D, Van Ruth PD, Lemckert C, Middleton JF. Observations of vertical turbulent nitrate flux during summer in the Great Australian Bight. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography. 2018;157:27-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2018.08.007
Ahmed MI, Mohammad Akhtaruzzaman K, Rahman MA, Mahmod MS, Nahar S. Relationship between HDL-Cholesterol and Angiographic Severity of Coronary Artery Disease. Bangladesh Heart J. 2018;33(1):32-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/bhj.v33i1.37023
Shirin M, Azad SA, Rahman M, Dina S, Karim E, Hossain A, et al. Detection of Coronary Artery Diseases: Comparative Study of Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiogram (64 slice scanner) and Conventional Angiogram. Cardiovascular J 2012;4(2):120-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/cardio.v4i2.10455
Amin MR, Singha CK, Banerjee SK, Hoque H, Mahabub SEE, Hoque M, et al. Comparison of Distal Transradial in the Anatomical Snuffbox versus Conventional Transradial Access for Coronary Angiography and Intervention-An Experience in 100 cases. University Heart J. 2018;13(2):40-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/uhj.v13i2.37657
Da Luz PL, Favarato D, Faria-Neto JR, Lemos P, Chagas ACP. High ratio of triglycerides to HDL-cholesterol predicts extensive coronary disease. Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil). 2008;63(4):427-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322008000400003
Rafiquzzaman K, Ali M, Rahman MT, Alam N, Hossain MA, Jafar AH, et al. Association of Body Mass Index with Angiographic Severity of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Acute ST- Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction’(STEMI). Cardiov J. 2017;10(1):68-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/cardio.v10i1.34365
Sabah KMN, Chowdhury AW, Khan HILR, Hasan ATMH, Haque S, Ali S, et al. Body mass index and waist/height ratio for prediction of severity of coronary artery disease. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-246
Akanda MA, Ali SY, Islam A, Rahman MM, Parveen A, Kabir MK, et al. Demographic Profile, Clinical Presentation and Angiographic Findings in 637 Patients with Coronary Heart Disease. Faridpur Med College J. 2011;6(2):82-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/fmcj.v6i2.9206
Shadly TA. Comparison of Puncture Outcome between Needle versus Cannula over needle technique for Radial Artery Cannulation during Distal Transradial Coronary Intervention. MD Thesis, NICVD. 2022.
Pancholy SB, Sanghvi KA, Patel TM. Radial artery access technique evaluation trial: randomized comparison of Seldinger versus modified Seldinger technique for arterial access for transradial catheterization. Catheterizat Cardiovascular Interventions. 2012;80(2):288-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.23445