A morphometric study of dry adult human sacra and its clinical relevance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20260252Keywords:
Dry adult human sacra, Epidural anaesthesia, Morphometry, Surgical interventionsAbstract
Background: The sacrum shows considerable anatomical variability, particularly in relation to the sacral hiatus and sacral canal. These variations are clinically important, as they may influence the success and safety of procedures such as caudal epidural anaesthesia, spinal interventions and pelvic surgeries. Detailed morphometric data are therefore essential for improving procedural accuracy and reducing complications. The present study aimed to evaluate the morphometric parameters of the sacrum, with special emphasis on the sacral hiatus and its relationship to the second sacral foramen and to assess their clinical significance.
Methods: The descriptive osteological study was conducted on fifty dry adult human sacra of unknown sex obtained from the Department of anatomy, and ESIC Medical College and Hospital, Faridabad, Haryana from May 2023 to December 2023. Measurements recorded included the length and anteroposterior diameter of the sacral hiatus, intercornual distance, the median distance between the lower margin of the S2 foramen and the apex of the sacral hiatus and the distance between the midpoint of the base of the hiatus and the S2 foramen. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics.
Results: Considerable variation was observed in all morphometric parameters, with specific ranges predominating for each measurement. In the present study, the length of the sacral hiatus most commonly ranged between 11–20 mm (44%). The anteroposterior diameter of the sacral canal at the level of the hiatus was predominantly 4–6 mm in 72% of specimens. The intercornual distance at the base of the sacral hiatus most frequently measured between 11–15 mm. Such variations highlight differences in sacral anatomy among individuals.
Conclusions: The study demonstrates significant morphometric variability of the sacrum, which has important clinical implications. Awareness of these variations can aid clinicians in improving the safety and success of caudal epidural anaesthesia and other sacral procedures, while also contributing valuable data for surgical planning and forensic identification.
Metrics
References
Standring S. Gray’s anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice: 42nd ed. China: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2021: 831–34.
Standring S. The Back. In: Gray’s Anatomy’s Sacrum. 40th ed. Edinburg, UK: Churchill Livingstone: 2008: 724.
Özcan AG, Solmaz E, Tatar MC, Karabulut AK. Anatomical evaluation of sacrum in dry bones. Anatomy. 2024;18(1):1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2399/ana.23.1411124
Sekiguchi M, Yabuki S, Saton K, Kikuchi S. An anatomical study of the sacral hiatus: a basis for successful caudal epidural block. Clin J Pain. 2004;20(1):51-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00002508-200401000-00010
Kilinç CY. Which technique should be choosed in posterior pelvic ring injuries: percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation technique or pos¬terior percutaneous transiliac plating technique. Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2019;21:80–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24938/kutfd.522989
Chen CP, Tang SF, Hsu T-C, Tsai W-C, Liu H-P, Chen MJ, et al. Ultrasound guidance in caudal epidural needle placement. Anesthesiology. 2004;101:181–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200407000-00028
Bagheri H, Govsa F. Anatomy of the sacral hiatus and its clinical rel¬evance in caudal epidural block. Surg Radiol Anat. 2017;39:943–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-017-1823-1
Mayuri J, Vijay G, Vasudha N. Anatomical Study Of Sacral Hiatus In Dry Isolated Sacra. J Res Med Den Sci. 2014; 2(2):43–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5455/jrmds.20142210
Kumar V, Pandey SN, Bajpai RN, Jain PN, Longia GS. Morphometrical study of sacral hiatus. Journal of Anatomical Soc India. 1992;41(1):7-13.
Seema, Singh M, Mahajan A. An anatomical study of variations of sacral hiatus in sacra of north indian origin and its clinical significance. Int J Morphol. 2013; 31(1):110–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022013000100017
Trotter M, Letterman GS. Variations of the female sacrum; Their significance in continuous caudal analgesia; Surg. Gynaecol. Obstet. 1944;78 (4):419–24.
Lanier VS, McKnight HE, Trotter M. Caudal analgesia: An experimental and anatomical study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1944;47 (5):633-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(16)40318-2
Vasuki AKM, Sundaram KK, Nirmaladevi M, Jamuna M, Hebzibah DJ, Fenn TKA. Anatomical Study of Sacrum and its Clinical Significance. Ann Int Med Den Res. 2016;2(3):123-7.
Nagar SK. A study of sacral hiatus in dry human sacra. J Anat Soc India. 2004;53(2):18-21.
Dipali Rani Pal, Md. ashfagur Rahman. Morphometric study of sacral hiatus: A basis for successful Caudal epidural block. Bangladesh J Anat. 2012;10(1):5–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/bja.v10i1.15750
Senoglu N, Senoglu M, Oksuz H, Gumusalan Y, Yuksel K, Zencirci B, et al. Landmarks of the sacral hiatus for caudal epidural block: an anatomical study. Br J Anaesth. 2005;95:692–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aei236
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
