Comparison of screening tests for gestational diabetes mellitus between "one step" and "two step" methods in an urban secondary care hospital – a prospective study

Authors

  • Snehal S. Ahire Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seth V. C. Gandhi and M. A. Vora Municipal Hospital, Ghatkopar (E), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • Swadhina B. Mohanty Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seth V. C. Gandhi and M. A. Vora Municipal Hospital, Ghatkopar (E), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • Shalini Bagaria Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seth V. C. Gandhi and M. A. Vora Municipal Hospital, Ghatkopar (E), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • Prajakta Goswami-Giri Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seth V. C. Gandhi and M. A. Vora Municipal Hospital, Ghatkopar (E), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20260633

Keywords:

Gestational diabetes mellitus, Screening tests, One-step method, Two-step method

Abstract

Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common pregnancy complication linked to adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. Screening is crucial, but the optimal method remains debated. This prospective study aimed to compare the prevalence of GDM and associated pregnancy outcomes using the "one-step" (75 gm GTT, IADPSG criteria) versus the "two-step" (50 gm GCT followed by 100 gm OGTT, ACOG criteria) screening methods in an urban secondary care hospital setting in India.

Methods: A total of 466 pregnant women (24-32 weeks gestation) were assigned to one-step (n=233) or two-step (n=233) GDM screening. Participants were followed until delivery for maternal and neonatal outcomes. GDM was diagnosed by established criteria for each method, and groups were compared.

Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable. GDM prevalence was 9.4% (one-step) versus 5.2% (two-step), a non-statistically significant difference (p=0.075). No significant differences were found in maternal or neonatal outcomes (including treatments, complications, or birth outcomes) between screening groups, even among those diagnosed with GDM.

Conclusion: In this setting, neither screening method demonstrated superior GDM detection rates or improved pregnancy outcomes. Larger, multicenter randomized controlled trials with cost-effectiveness analysis are recommended to determine the optimal GDM screening strategy for the Indian population.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Swadhina B. Mohanty, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seth V. C. Gandhi and M. A. Vora Municipal Hospital, Ghatkopar (E), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

MBBS, MD(OBGY). Senior DNB Consultant and Head of Unit (HOU) in dept of OBGY at Seth V.C. Gandhi and M. A. Vora Municipal Hospital, Ghatkopar(E), Mumbai

Shalini Bagaria, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seth V. C. Gandhi and M. A. Vora Municipal Hospital, Ghatkopar (E), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

MBBS, MD(OBGY) Senior DNB Consultant at Seth V. C. Gandhi and M. A. Vora Municipal Hospital, Ghatkopar (E),  Mumbai

Prajakta Goswami-Giri, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seth V. C. Gandhi and M. A. Vora Municipal Hospital, Ghatkopar (E), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

MBBS, MD(OBGY)

PGMO at Seth V.C.Gandhi and M. A. Vora Municipal Hospital, Ghatkopar (E),  Mumbai

References

Seshiah V, Balaji V, Balaji MS, Sanjeevi CB, Green A. Gestational diabetes mellitus in India. J Assoc Physicians India. 2004;52:707-11.

Naylor CD, Sermer M, Chen E, Farine D. Selective screening for gestational diabetes mellitus. Toronto Trihospital Gestational Diabetes Project Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:1591-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199711273372204

Rajput M, Bairwa M, Rajput R. Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in rural Haryana: A community-based study. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2014;18(3):350-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.131176

Sajani TT, Rahman MT, Karim MR. Maternal and fetal outcome of mothers with gestational diabetes mellitus attending BIRDEM Hospital. Mymensingh Med J. 2014;23:290-8.

Schaefer-Graf UM, Pawliczak J, Passow D. Birth weight and parental BMI predict overweight in children from mothers with gestational diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:1745-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.28.7.1745

O’Sullivan JB, Mahan CM. Criteria for the oral glucose tolerance test in pregnancy. Diabetes. 1964;13:278-85.

HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group, Metzger BE, Lowe LP, et al. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1991-2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0707943

American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(1):S67-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2337/dc13-S067

American College of Obstricians and Gynecologists. Committee opinion no. 504: screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118:751-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182310cc3

McIntyre HD, Catalano P, Zhang C, Desoye G, Mathiesen ER, Damm P. Gestational diabetes mellitus. Natur Rev Dis Primers. 2019;5(1):47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-019-0098-8

Ramezani Tehrani F, Rahmati M, Farzadfar F, Abedini M, Farahmand M, Hosseinpanah F, et al. One-step versus two-step screening for diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus in Iranian population: A randomized community trial. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023;13:1039643. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.1039643

Şahin M, Görkem Ü, Bilgi A, Dikker O. Comparison of the effectiveness of screening methods for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus in pregnant women: A cross-sectional study. Int J Clin Pract. 2021;75(11):e14857. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.14857

Khalifeh A, Eckler R, Felder L, Saccone G, Caissutti C, Berghella V. One-step versus two-step diagnostic testing for gestational diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(4):612-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2018.1498480

Can B, Hansu K. Gestational Diabetes Screen One or Two-step Approach? Forbes J Med. 2023;4(2):224-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4274/forbes.galenos.2023.69077

Luewan S, Bootchaingam P, Tongsong T. Comparison of the Screening Tests for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus between "One-Step" and "Two-Step" Methods among Thai Pregnant Women. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2018;2018:1521794. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1521794

Saccone G, Khalifeh A, Al-Kouatly HB, Sendek K, Berghella V. Screening for gestational diabetes mellitus: one step versus two step approach. A meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(9):1616-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2018.1519543

Davis EM, Abebe KZ, Simhan HN, Catalano P, Costacou T, Comer D, et al. Perinatal Outcomes of Two Screening Strategies for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;138(1):6-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000004431

Downloads

Published

2026-02-26

How to Cite

Ahire, S. S., Mohanty, S. B., Bagaria, S., & Goswami-Giri, P. (2026). Comparison of screening tests for gestational diabetes mellitus between "one step" and "two step" methods in an urban secondary care hospital – a prospective study. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 14(3), 1108–1113. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20260633

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles