Confocal reflectance microscopy versus digital dermoscopy for the diagnosis of melanoma in equivocal lesions: a systematic review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20260751Keywords:
Confocal microscopy, Digital dermoscopy, Melanoma, Diagnostic accuracy, Specificity, Number needed to exciseAbstract
The diagnosis of melanoma in clinically or dermoscopically equivocal melanocytic lesions is difficult and gives rise to many unnecessary excisions. This review compares in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy or confocal reflectance microscopy (RCM of CRM) and digital dermoscopy in the diagnosis of melanoma in equivocal lesions. We conducted a systematic review of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central and Web of Science (according to PRISMA) until 30 January 2026. Eligible studies were direct comparisons of RCM and digital dermoscopy in adults with equivocal lesions and had histopathology as the reference standard. Data extraction and quality appraisal using the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies-2 (QUADAS-2) instrument were performed in duplicate. Where studies were homogenous enough for the statistical analysis, we used a bivariate random-effects model to pool sensitivity and specificity; or used a structured narrative synthesis otherwise. Fifteen (2007-2020) studies were included in which referral cohorts of equivocal lesions were included. In data pooled from the similar studies sensitivity of RCM was about 91% {[95% confidence intervals (CI) 88-94%]} with specificity almost at 69% (95% CI 62-76%). Digital dermoscopy demonstrated the same sensitivity, approximately 88% (95% CI 83 92) but significantly worse specificity, approximately 34% (95% CI 2841). Heterogeneity was high and was determined by referral setting, reader experience, device type and algorithm use. Studies consistently found that the number needed to excise was reduced from approximately 3.7 by dermoscopy alone to near 1.1 by RCM guided excision. For lesions that are still equivocal even after being clinically and assessed by dermoscopy, the RCM substantially improves specificity but at the cost of a high sensitivity. RCM is a useful second-level test in specialist environments but operator education, cost, and poor penetration depth limit the broader use of this modality.
Metrics
References
Alendar F, Drljević I, Drljević K, Alendar T. Early detection of melanoma skin cancer. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2009;9(1):77-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17305/bjbms.2009.2861
Xiong YJ, Guo Q, Yang KL, Wang L, Hu XH. Comparison of dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of malignant skin tumours: a meta-analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017;143(9):1627-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-017-2391-9
Yüksel ME, Borlu M. Accurate segmentation of dermoscopic images by image thresholding based on type-2 fuzzy logic. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst. 2009;17(4):976-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2009.2018300
Witkowski AM, Łudzik J, Arginelli F, Longo C, Moscarella E, Ciardo S, et al. Improving diagnostic sensitivity of combined dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy imaging through double reader concordance evaluation in telemedicine settings: a retrospective study of 1000 equivocal cases. PLoS One. 2017;12(11):e0187748. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187748
Mesquita Y, Marques IR, Pera Calvi I, Farnetani F, Pellacani G, Longo C, et al. Reflectance confocal microscopy for margin mapping of melanoma of the lentigo maligna type: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2025;39(3):566-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.20383
Thomas L, Puig S. Dermoscopy, digital dermoscopy and other diagnostic tools in the early detection of melanoma and follow-up of high-risk skin cancer patients. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh). 2017;(218):14-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/00015555-2719
Salerni G, Terán T, Puig S, Malvehy J, Zalaudek I, Argenziano G, et al. Meta-analysis of digital dermoscopy follow-up of melanocytic skin lesions: a study on behalf of the International Dermoscopy Society. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2013;27(7):805-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.12032
Tognetti L, Cevenini G, Moscarella E, Pampena R, Argenziano G, Longo C, et al. An integrated clinical-dermoscopic risk scoring system for the differentiation between early melanoma and atypical nevi: the iDScore. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018;32(12):2162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.15106
Garbe C, Amaral T, Peris K, Hauschild A, Arenberger P, Basset-Seguin N, et al. European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for melanoma. Part 2: Treatment-update 2022. Eur J Cancer. 2022;170:256-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2022.04.018
López-Liria R, Valverde-Martínez MÁ, López-Villegas A, Bautista-Mesa RJ, Vega-Ramírez FA, Peiró S, et al. Teledermatology versus face-to-face dermatology: an analysis of cost-effectiveness from eight studies from Europe and the United States. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(5):2534. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052534
Franceschini C, Persechino F, Ardigò M. In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy in general dermatology: how to choose the right indication. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2020;10(2):e2020032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5826/dpc.1002a32
Pizzichetta MA, Talamini R, Stanganelli I, Puddu P, Bono R, Argenziano G, et al. Amelanotic/hypomelanotic melanoma: clinical and dermoscopic features. Br J Dermatol. 2004;150(6):1117-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.05928.x
Guida S, Ciardo S, Kaleci S, Farnetani F, Spadafora M, Radi G, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of magnified dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy in assessing melanocytic lesions. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2025;15(3):5253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5826/dpc.1503a5253
Lan J, Wen J, Cao S, Chen Y, Zhou Y, Zhao J, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy for amelanotic/hypomelanotic melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Dermatol. 2020;183(2):210-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.18722
McInnes MDF, Moher D, Thombs BD, McGrath TA, Bossuyt PM, Clifford T, et al. Preferred reporting items for a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies: the PRISMA-DTA statement. JAMA. 2018;319(4):388-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.19163
Pellacani G, Guitera P, Longo C, Avramidis M, Seidenari S, Menzies SW. The impact of in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy for the diagnostic accuracy of melanoma and equivocal melanocytic lesions. J Invest Dermatol. 2007;127(12):2759-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jid.5700993
Guitera P, Pellacani G, Crotty KA, Scolyer RA, Li LX, Menzies SW. In vivo confocal microscopy enhances secondary evaluation of melanocytic lesions. J Invest Dermatol. 2009;129(1):131-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2008.193
Guitera P, Pellacani G, Crotty KA, Scolyer RA, Li LX, Menzies SW. The impact of in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy on the diagnostic accuracy of lentigo maligna and equivocal pigmented and nonpigmented macules of the face. J Invest Dermatol. 2010;130(8):2080-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2010.84
Guitera P, Menzies SW, Longo C, Cesinaro AM, Scolyer RA, Pellacani G. In vivo confocal microscopy for diagnosis of melanoma and basal cell carcinoma using a two-step method: analysis of 710 consecutive clinically equivocal cases. J Invest Dermatol. 2012;132(10):2386-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2012.172
Segura S, Puig S, Carrera C, Palou J, Malvehy J. Development of a two-step method for the diagnosis of melanoma by reflectance confocal microscopy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;61(2):216-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2009.02.014
Lovatto L, Carrera C, Salerni G, Alós L, Malvehy J, Puig S. In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy of equivocal melanocytic lesions detected by digital dermoscopy follow-up. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;29(10):1918-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.13067
Pellacani G, Pepe P, Casari A, Longo C. Reflectance confocal microscopy as a second-level examination in skin oncology improves diagnostic accuracy and saves unnecessary excisions: a longitudinal prospective study. Br J Dermatol. 2014;171(5):1044-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.13148
Alarcón I, Carrera C, Palou J, Alós L, Malvehy J, Puig S. Impact of in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy on the number needed to treat melanoma in doubtful lesions. Br J Dermatol. 2014;170(4):802-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.12678
Stanganelli I, Longo C, Mazzoni L, Magi S, Farnetani F, Argenziano G, et al. Integration of reflectance confocal microscopy in sequential dermoscopy follow-up improves melanoma detection accuracy. Br J Dermatol. 2015;172(2):365-71 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.13373
Longo C, Mazzeo M, Raucci M, Pellacani G, Farnetani F, Argenziano G, et al. Dark pigmented lesions: diagnostic accuracy of dermatoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy in a tertiary referral center for skin cancer diagnosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83(2):654-6.
Cinotti E, Labeille B, Debarbieux S, Carrera C, Puig S, Malvehy J, et al. Dermoscopy versus reflectance confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of lentigo maligna. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018;32(8):1284-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.14791
Menge TD, Hibler BP, Cordova MA, Nehal KS, Rossi AM. Concordance of handheld reflectance confocal microscopy with histopathology in the diagnosis of lentigo maligna: a prospective study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;74(6):1114-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2015.12.045
Longo C, Farnetani F, Ciardo S, Ragazzi M, Moscarella E, Ponti G, et al. Is confocal microscopy a valuable tool in diagnosing nodular lesions? A study of 140 cases. Br J Dermatol. 2013;169(1):58-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.12259
Pezzini C, Kaleci S, Farnetani F, Longo C, Pellacani G. Diagnostic accuracy of reflectance confocal microscopy for malignant melanoma in different clinical settings: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34(10):2268-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.16248
Dinnes J, Deeks JJ, Saleh D, Chuchu N, Bayliss SE, Patel L, et al. Reflectance confocal microscopy for diagnosing cutaneous melanoma in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;12:CD013190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013191
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
