Quality of the informed consent process in diabetic foot amputation surgery: a prospective multicenter study in Senegal

Authors

  • Mohamadou L. Gueye Department of General surgery, Cheikh Anta Diop University Dakar, Senegal
  • Mouhamadou L. Diop Department of General surgery, Cheikh Anta Diop University Dakar, Senegal
  • Alpha O. Toure Department of General surgery, Cheikh Anta Diop University Dakar, Senegal
  • Yacine Seye Department of General surgery, Cheikh Anta Diop University Dakar, Senegal
  • Souleymane Diao Department of Orthopedics and traumatology, Cheikh Anta Diop University Dakar, Senegal
  • Mamadou Seck Department of General surgery, Cheikh Anta Diop University Dakar, Senegal
  • Aïda Sylla Department of General surgery, Cheikh Anta Diop University Dakar, Senegal
  • Mor Diaw Department of General surgery, Cheikh Anta Diop University Dakar, Senegal
  • Ousmane Ka Department of General surgery, Cheikh Anta Diop University Dakar, Senegal
  • Madieng Dieng Department of General surgery, Cheikh Anta Diop University Dakar, Senegal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20261318

Keywords:

Amputation, Diabetic foot, Informed consent, Medical ethics, Senegal, Surgery

Abstract

Background: Informed consent represents a fundamental ethical and legal requirement in surgical practice, particularly in mutilating procedures such as lower-limb amputation for diabetic foot. In low-resource settings, several structural and sociocultural factors may limit the quality of the informed consent process.

Methods: A prospective descriptive and analytical multicenter study was conducted from April to December 2022 in three teaching hospitals in Dakar, Senegal. Adult patients hospitalized for surgical management of diabetic foot were included. Data were collected using structured questionnaires completed by physicians and patients to evaluate socio-demographic characteristics, clinical data, and the quality of the informed consent process. The perceived quality of informed consent was categorized as favorable (excellent or average) or unfavorable (poor). Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-square test with a significance level set at p<0.05.

Results: A total of 109 patients were included with a mean age of 62.1±9.1 years. Most patients (92.7%) reported understanding their diagnosis. However, several deficiencies were identified in the consent process: insufficient information about complementary investigations (78.9%), prosthetic rehabilitation (61.5%), and lack of confidentiality during counselling (82.6%). Only 25.7% of patients reported complete satisfaction with the consent process. Interview duration longer than five minutes (p<0.001), clarity of information (p<0.001), physician empathy (p<0.001), and counselling conducted in a private consultation room (p=0.001) were significantly associated with a favorable perception of informed consent.

Conclusions: The informed consent process for diabetic foot amputation remains suboptimal despite a generally positive physician-patient relationship. Improving communication, ensuring confidentiality, and allocating sufficient consultation time may significantly enhance the quality of informed consent in surgical practice.

References

Atun R, Davies JI, Gale EA, Bärnighausen T, Beran D, Kengne AP, et al. Diabetes in sub-Saharan Africa: from clinical care to health policy. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5(8):622-67.

Armstrong DG, Boulton AJM, Bus SA. diabetic foot ulcers and their recurrence. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(24):2367-75.

Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 9th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2023.

Republic of Senegal. Law No. 2011-33 of December 14, 2011 establishing the Code of Medical Ethics. Official Journal; 2011.

Mfutso-Bengo J, Masiye F, Molyneux S, Ndebele P, Chilungo A. Why do individuals agree to enrol in clinical trials? A qualitative study of health research participation in Blantyre, Malawi. Dev World Bioeth. 2008;8(2):109-18

Milford C, Wassenaar D, Slack C. Strengthening informed consent in South Africa: recommendations for improvement. S Afr Med J. 2006;96(9):890-2

Sarr AS, Ndiaye B, Dioussé P, Dia A, Ndiaye M. Informed consent in surgical practice in Senegal: a pilot study. Med Trop. 2012;72(3):291-4.

Falagas ME, Zarkadoulia EA, Samonis G. Patient education in low-literacy settings in the developing world. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007;7(9):596-600

Entwistle VA, Carter SM, Cribb A, McCaffery K. Supporting patient autonomy: the importance of clinician-patient relationships. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(7):741-5

Ho A. The individualist model of autonomy and the challenge of disability. J Bioeth Inq. 2008;5(2-3):193-207

Surbone A. Cultural aspects of communication in cancer care. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2006;168:91-104

Molyneux CS, Wassenaar DR, Peshu N, Marsh K. 'Even if they ask you to stand by a tree all day, you will have to do it (laughter)…!': Community voices on the notion and practice of informed consent for biomedical research in developing countries. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(2):443-54.

Ochieng J, Ibingira C, Buwembo W, Munabi I, Kiryowa H, Kitara D, et al. Informed consent practices for surgical care at university teaching hospitals: a case in a low resource setting. BMC Med Ethics. 2014;15:40.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-29

How to Cite

Gueye, M. L., Diop, M. L., Toure, A. O., Seye, Y., Diao, S., Seck, M., Sylla, A., Diaw, M., Ka, O., & Dieng, M. (2026). Quality of the informed consent process in diabetic foot amputation surgery: a prospective multicenter study in Senegal. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 14(5), 1845–1849. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20261318

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles