Domain-specific prevalence of learning disability among government and non-government school children
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20261340Keywords:
Neurodevelopmental disorders, Learning disabilities, Learning disability diagnostic inventory, Coloured progressive matrices, Intelligence testsAbstract
Background: Learning disability is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by persistent difficulties in acquiring academic skills despite adequate intelligence and educational opportunities. Educational environments may influence the pattern and prevalence of learning disability. However, comparative evidence across different school systems remains limited. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of learning disability among school children in government and non-government schools. Additionally, to examine the relationship between Intelligence Quotient (IQ) and learning disability diagnostic inventory (LDDI) domains along with perceptual deficits.
Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted among 240 school children aged between 8-12 years. Learning disability were assessed using the LDDI, while intelligence was evaluated using Raven’s Coloured Progressive Matrices (CPM). Descriptive statistics were used to estimate prevalence across domains and school types. Correlation analysis was performed to examine the association between IQ and LDDI domains, with statistical significance considered at p<0.05.
Results: Domain specific prevalence of learning disability was observed. Listening disability was the most prevalent domain, affecting (30%) students in government and (16%) of non-government school students, followed by speaking (27% and 12.5% respectively). Among perceptual deficits, position in space (11.6% and 10%) and eye-hand coordination (4-6%) were most frequently observed. Overall, government school students showed a relatively higher prevalence. A significant association was observed between learning disability domains and Intelligence quotient scores (p<0.05)
Conclusions: The study highlights the domain-specific prevalence of learning disability among school children and emphasizes the importance of early screening, targeted educational strategies and school-based interventions to improve learning outcomes.
References
Fletcher JM, Grigorenko EL. Neuropsychology of Learning Disabilities: The Past and the Future.J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2017;23(9):930–40.
McDowell M. Specific learning disability. J Paediatrics Child Health. 2018;54(10):1077–83.
Muktamath VU, Hegde PR, Chand S. Types of specific learning disability. Learning disabilities-neurobiology, assessment, clinical features and treatments. 2022: 10.
Goel U. Prevalence of selected learning disabilities among primary schoolchildren through primary school teachers: a descriptive survey. Indian J Psych Nurs. 2021;18(1):23–8.
Scaria LM, Bhaskaran D, George B. Prevalence of specific learning disorders (SLD) among children in india: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian J Psychol Med. 2023;45(3):213–9.
McKenna JW, Flower A, Kyung Kim M, Ciullo S, Haring C. A systematic review of function‐based interventions for students with learning disabilities. Learn Disabil Res Pract. 2015;30(1):15–28.
Cardillo R, Erbì C, Mammarella IC. Spatial perspective-taking in children with autism spectrum disorders: the predictive role of visuospatial and motor abilities. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020;3;14:208.
Cowan R, Powell D. The contributions of domain-general and numerical factors to third-grade arithmetic skills and mathematical learning disability. J Edu Psychol. 2014;106(1):214–29.
Shah H, Sagar JV, Somaiya M, Nagpal J. Clinical practice guidelines on assessment and management of specific learning disorders. Indian J Psychiatry. 2019;61(8):211.
Sakiz H. Students with learning disabilities within the context of inclusive education: issues of identification and school management. Int J Inclusive Edu. 2018;22(3):285–305.
Emam MM, Almehrizi R, Omara E, Kazem AM. Screening for learning disabilities in Oman: confirmatory factor analysis of the Arabic version of the learning disabilities diagnostic inventory. Int J Dev Disab. 2021;67(6):428–38.
Cuschieri S. The STROBE guidelines. Saudi J Anaesth. 2019;13(5):31.
Darne S. Learning disabilities: detection and neurological assessment in school going children. Int J Contemp Pediatr. 2016;837–40.
Cotton SM, Kiely PM, Crewther DP, Thomson B, Laycock R, Crewther SG. A normative and reliability study for the Raven’s Coloured Progressive Matrices for primary school aged children from Victoria, Australia. Personal Indiv Differ. 2005;39:647-59.
Chacko D, Vidhukumar K. The Prevalence of Specific Learning Disorder among School-going Children in Ernakulam District, Kerala, India: Ernakulam Learning Disorder (ELD) Study. Indian J Psychol Med. 2020;42(3):250–5.
Bandla S, Mandadi GD, Bhogaraju A. Specific Learning Disabilities and Psychiatric Comorbidities in School Children in South India. Indian J Psychol Med. 2017;39(1):76–82.
Ali S, Rafi M. Learning disabilities: Characteristics and instructional approaches. Int J Humanities, Social Sci Edu. 2016;3(4):111-5.
Hunter LL, Blankenship CM, Lin L, Sloat NT, Perdew A, Stewart H, et al. Peripheral auditory involvement in childhood listening difficulty. Ear & Hearing. 2021;42(1):29–41.
Cardillo R, Erbì C, Mammarella IC. Spatial perspective-taking in children with autism spectrum disorders: the predictive role of visuospatial and motor abilities. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020;3;14:208.
Scholz M, Scheer D. The relationship between reading skills and intelligence in students with and without special educational needs in learning. Front Educ. 2020;8;5:123.
Santarnecchi E, Emmendorfer A, Pascual-Leone A. Dissecting the parieto-frontal correlates of fluid intelligence: A comprehensive ALE meta-analysis study. Intelligence. 2017;63:9–28.
Margolis AE, Broitman J, Davis JM, Alexander L, Hamilton A, Liao Z, et al. Estimated prevalence of nonverbal learning disability among north american children and adolescents. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;10;3(4):202551.
Cowan R, Powell D. The contributions of domain-general and numerical factors to third-grade arithmetic skills and mathematical learning disability. J Edu Psychol. 2014;106(1):214–29.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
