Comparative study between skin staples and conventional sutures for skin closure in elective abdominal surgery
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20260946Keywords:
Skin closure, Staplers, Sutures, Elective surgeryAbstract
Background: Skin closure is a crucial step in surgical procedures, as it directly affects wound healing, postoperative infection risk, and the aesthetic quality of the incision. The purpose of the study is to compare skin staples and conventional sutures for skin closure in elective abdominal surgery with respect to closure time, postoperative outcomes, and cosmetic results.
Methods: This prospective comparative study at the Department of General Surgery, Enam Medical College and Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh (March 2022–February 2023) included 60 elective abdominal surgery patients (30 staples, 30 sutures). Primary outcome was skin closure time; secondary outcomes were surgical site infection, pain, hospital stay, and cosmetic results. Data were analyzed using independent samples t-tests and chi-square tests (p<0.05).
Results: Sixty patients (30 per group) showed comparable baseline characteristics (p>0.05). Skin closure time was significantly shorter with staples than sutures (2.4±0.7 versus 9.8±2.5 minutes; p<0.001). Surgical site infection, postoperative pain, and hospital stay were similar between groups (p>0.05). Cosmetic outcome was significantly better with sutures (73.3% versus 40.0%; p=0.030).
Conclusions: Skin staples offer faster skin closure, whereas conventional sutures provide better cosmetic outcomes, with no significant difference in postoperative complications.
Metrics
References
Gargava A, Verma P, Shukla A, Upadhyay A. Comparative study between staplers versus subcuticular suture for wound closure after thyroidectomy. Int J Pharm Clin Res. 2023;15(8):826 30.
Chauhan A. Comparative study of stapled skin closure versus conventional skin closure in elective surgeries. J Med Sci Clin Res. 2018;6(6). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i6.54
Owens CD, Stoessel K. Surgical site infections: epidemiology, microbiology and prevention. J Hosp Infect. 2008;70(2):3-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-6701(08)60017-1
Imamura K, Adachi K, Sasaki R, Monma S, Shioiri S, Seyama Y, et al. Randomized comparison of subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure after open abdominal surgery: a multicenter open-label randomized controlled trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20(12):2083-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-016-3283-z
Tajirian AL, Goldberg DJ. A review of sutures and other skin closure materials. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2010;12(6):296-302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/14764172.2010.538413
Lal V, Shaikh TP, Narayan P, Ansari S, Deolekar S. Study of comparison between skin sutures and skin staplers: 400 case studies. Int J Res Med Sci. 2017;3(1):277-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5455/2320-6012.ijrms20150150
Reece TB, Maxey TS, Kron IL. A prospectus on tissue adhesives. Am J Surg. 2001;182(2):S40-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00742-5
Cirocchi R, Randolph J, Montedori A, Cochetti G, Arezzo A, Mearini E, et al. Staples versus sutures for surgical wound closure in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011250
Wang H, Hong S, Teng H, Gin H. Subcutaneous suture V/S staplers for skin closure after caesarean delivery. A metaanalysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;(22):3705-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2016.1141886
Kochar MP, Singh SP. Incised surgical wound closure with sutures and staples: A controlled experimental study. Int Surg J. 2015;2:369-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20150501
Bailey L, Williams NS, Ronan P. Oconnell AW’s short practical of surgery. CRC Press. 2018.
Johnson A, Rodeheaver GT, Durand LS, Edgerton MT, Edlich RF. Automatic disposable stapling devices for wound closure. Ann Emerg Med. 1981;10(12):631-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(81)80086-8
Jewell ML, Sato R, Rahija R. A comparison of wound healing in wounds closed with staples versus skin suture. Contemp Surg. 1983;22(1):29-32.
Shah SK, Fayaz S, Shahid FR. Comparison of surgical wound closure by staples and sutures. Biol Clin Sci Res J. 2024;5:889. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.889
Anyanwu SNC, Okoye AO, Obiesie EA, Eze BU, Ihekwoaba EC, Nwofor AME. Comparative Study of Use of Reusable Skin Staples and Vertical Mattress Sutures in the Closure of Midline Laparotomy Wounds. J West Afr Coll Surg. 2024;14(1):41-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jwas.jwas_50_23
Rabha P, Srinivas S, Bhuyan K. Closure of skin in surgical wounds with skin stapler and conventional sutures: a comparative study. Int Surg J. 2022;9(1):66-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20215132
Kathare SS, Shinde ND. A comparative study of skin staples and conventional sutures for abdominal skin wound closures. Int Surg J. 2019;6(6):2168-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20192387
Feng J, Jiang X, Zhi Z. Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure in patients undergoing abdominal surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2021;16(5):e0251022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251022
Chavali P, Ganta N, Reddy MM. Comparison of staple closure of skin versus suture closure of skin in elective surgical wounds. Int Surg J. 2025;12(7):1107-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20251906
Agilinko J, Tan P. A double-blinded randomised controlled trial–do subcuticular non-absorbable skin sutures have a better aesthetic outcome than skin staples in large wound closures? GMS Interdisciplinary Plastic Reconstruct Surg. 2019;8:Doc16.