Effect of stellate ganglion block on graft re-exploration rates in free flap graft placement surgeries in patients with head and neck cancer: a randomized controlled trial

Authors

  • Ankur Verma Department of Onco-Anesthesia, BLK Max Super Speciality Hospital, Pusa Road, New Delhi, India
  • Pooja Singh Department of Onco-Anesthesia, BLK Max Super Speciality Hospital, Pusa Road, New Delhi, India
  • Shubhashish Biswas Department of Onco-Anesthesia, BLK Max Super Speciality Hospital, Pusa Road, New Delhi, India
  • Rahul Kapoor Department of Surgical Oncology, Reconstructive Surgery, BLK Max Super Speciality Hospital, Pusa Road, New Delhi, India
  • Vikas Saraswat Department of Onco-Critical Care, BLK Max Super Speciality Hospital, Pusa Road, New Delhi, India
  • Surender K. Dabas Department of Surgical Oncology and Robotic Surgery, BLK Max Super Speciality Hospital, Pusa Road, New Delhi, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20262176

Keywords:

Stellate ganglion block, Free flap, Head and neck cancer, Graft failure, Graft re-exploration

Abstract

Background: Free flap reconstruction is frequently used after extensive head and neck cancer surgery. Sympathetic blockade may improve flap perfusion by reducing vasospasm. This study evaluated whether stellate ganglion block (SGB) reduces graft re-exploration in head and neck free flap surgeries.

Methods: In this double-blinded randomized controlled trial, 70 patients undergoing free flap reconstruction were randomized to receive ultrasound-guided SGB with bupivacaine and triamcinolone (test group) or saline (control group). The primary outcome was grafting re-exploration. Secondary outcomes included graft failure and block-related adverse effects.

Results: Baseline demographic and intraoperative characteristics were comparable between groups. Graft failure occurred in 5 patients in the control group and 2 patients in the test group (OR 3.33, 95% CI 0.55–20.22). Re-exploration was required in 1 patient in the control group and none in the test group (OR 3.36, 95% CI 0.13–88.39). No block-related adverse events occurred.

Conclusion: Stellate ganglion block was safe and showed a trend toward reduced graft-related complications, although statistical significance was not achieved. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.

References

Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209-49.

Kulkarni MR. Head and Neck Cancer Burden in India. Int J Head Neck Surg. 2013;4:29-35.

Bhandari S, Singh R, Mehndiratta S, Dadhich M. The impact of facial disfigurement and self-image anxiety on the quality of life of head and neck cancer patients. Oral Oncol Rep. 2024;10:100518.

Nogueira TE, Adorno M, Mendonça E, Leles C. Factors associated with the quality of life of subjects disfigurement due to surgical treatment of head and neck cancer. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2018;23:e132-7.

Gabrysz-Forget F, Tabet P, Rahal A, Bissada E, Christopoulos A, Ayad T. Free versus pedicled flaps for reconstruction of head and neck cancer defects: a systematic review. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;48:13.

Copelli C, Tewfik K, Cassano L, Pederneschi N, Catanzaro S, Manfuso, A et al. Management of free flap failure in head and neck surgery. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2017;37:387-92.

Geiger EJ, Basques BA, Chang CC, Son Y, Sasaki CT, McGregor A, et al. Pedicle versus free flap reconstruction in patients receiving intraoperative brachytherapy. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2016;50:227-32.

Goswami U, Jain A. Anaesthetic implications of free-flap microvascular surgery for head and neck malignancies – A relook. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2021;37:499-504.

Habib AMA, Zanaty OM, Anwer HF, Abo Alia D. The effect of paravertebral block on maxillofacial free flap survival. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;46:706-11.

Hyun SJ, Ahn S-H. Risk of Microvascular Anastomosis Performed in Previous Treated Neck. Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg. 2021;64:811-9.

Zor F, Ozturk S, Usyilmaz S, Sengezer M. Is stellate ganglion blockade an option to prevent early arterial vasospasm after digital microsurgical procedures? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:1059-60.

Su HH, Lui PW, Yu CL, Liew CS, Lin CH, Lin YT, et al. The effects of continuous axillary brachial plexus block with ropivacaine infusion on skin temperature and survival of crushed fingers after microsurgical replantation. Chang Gung Med J. 2005;28(8):567-74.

Demir A, Kucuker I, Keles MK, Demirtas Y. The effect of learning curve on flap selection, re-exploration, and salvage rates in free flaps; A retrospective analysis of 155 cases. Microsurgery. 2013;33:519-26.

Trkulja V, Hrabač P. Confidence intervals: what are they to us, medical doctors? Croat Med J. 2019;60:375-82.

Ichinose M, Nakabayashi M, Ono Y. Difference in the integrated effects of sympathetic vasoconstriction and local vasodilation in human skeletal muscle and skin microvasculature. Physiol Rep. 2019;7:e14070.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-29

How to Cite

Verma, A., Singh, P., Biswas, S., Kapoor, R., Saraswat, V., & Dabas, S. K. (2026). Effect of stellate ganglion block on graft re-exploration rates in free flap graft placement surgeries in patients with head and neck cancer: a randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 14(7), 2891–2894. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20262176

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles