Experimental characterization of ionization chamber stem effects in low-density media for flattened and flattening-filter-free photon beams
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20263082Keywords:
Flattening filter-free beams, Lung-equivalent phantom, SBRT, Ionization chamber, Stem effect, Small-field dosimetryAbstract
Background: Accurate dosimetry in low-density media is essential for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of lung tumors, particularly with small radiation fields and flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beams. This study experimentally evaluated ionization chamber stem effects under low-density conditions.
Methods: This experimental dosimetric study was conducted from March 2025 to June 2025 at the Department of Radiation Oncology, Sutter Gould Medical Foundation, Modesto, CA, USA. A PTW TN30013 Farmer-type ionization chamber was evaluated for 6 MV, 6 MV FFF, 10 MV and 10 MV FFF photon beams in a low-density Styrofoam phantom (0.04–0.05 g/cm³) and in-air conditions for field sizes ranging from 2×2 cm² to 20×20 cm² and depths from 1.5 to 20 cm.
Results: Within the phantom, ionization readings for FFF beams were 5–20% lower than those for flattened beams at shallow depths due to reduced scatter. In-air measurements for FFF beams were up to 30% higher than flattened beams for small field sizes. Stem effects remained below 0.6% across all tested conditions. Collimator rotation dependence was negligible (<0.05%, p>0.05). Significant interactions between beam type, setup and depth were observed (p<0.001).
Conclusions: The PTW TN30013 chamber demonstrated stable and reliable performance in low-density media relevant to lung SBRT. Stem-related perturbations were clinically negligible, although beam-specific correction factors remain important for FFF small-field dosimetry.
References
Almond PR, Biggs PJ, Coursey BM, Hanson WF, Huq MS, Nath R, et al. AAPM’s TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams. Med Phys. 1999;26:1847–70.
International Atomic Energy Agency. Absorbed Dose Determination in External Beam Radiotherapy: An International Code of Practice for Dosimetry Based on Standards of Absorbed Dose to Water. IAEA TRS-398. Vienna: IAEA. 2000.
Das IJ, Ding GX, Ahnesjö A. Small fields: Nonequilibrium radiation dosimetry. Med Phys. 2008;35:4186–215.
Low DA, Moran JM, Dempsey JF, Dong L, Oldham M. Dosimetry tools and techniques for IMRT. Med Phys. 2011;38:1313–38.
Scott AJ, Nahum AE, Fenwick JD. Small-field dosimetry for stereotactic beams. Phys Med Biol. 2012;57:1497–510.
McEwen MR. Measurement of ionization chamber stem effects. Med Phys. 2010;37:2179–88.
Perucha M. Stem effect in ionization chambers. Phys Med Biol. 2003;48:3111–24.
Ma CM. Monte Carlo study of stem effects in ionization chambers. Med Phys. 1993;20:1171–6.
Klein EE. Task Group 142 report: Quality assurance of medical accelerators. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;75:1267–73.
Chetty IJ. Report of the AAPM Task Group No. 105: Issues associated with clinical implementation of Monte Carlo-based photon and electron external beam treatment planning. Med Phys. 2007;34:4818–53.
Wilcox EE. Accuracy of dose measurements in low-density media. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2008;9:35.
Dunn L. Dosimetric effects of low-density lung tissue in SBRT. Phys Med Biol. 2013;58:529–44.
Kry SF. Dosimetric uncertainties in lung SBRT. Med Phys. 2013;40:111719.
Vassiliev ON. Monte Carlo study of photon beam characteristics. Med Phys. 2006;33:820–8.
Xiao Y. Flattening filter-free beams in SBRT. Med Phys. 2004;31:250–64.
Griessbach I. Dosimetric characteristics of small fields. Phys Med Biol. 2005;50:3161–70.
Smith J. Stem effect measurements in photon beams. Med Phys. 2010;37:2265–76.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
