Epidemiological characterization of raw areas at the hospital general de México: a 4-year retrospective analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20260931Keywords:
Epidemiology, Raw areas, Wound classification, Wound managementAbstract
Background: To identify the epidemiological characteristics of raw areas at the Hospital General de México.
Methods: An observational, cross-sectional and descriptive study was conducted to describe the presentation and management characteristics of raw areas at the Hospital General de México from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2025. Variables included age, gender, occupation, affected area, wound classification and treatment. A non-probability sample was obtained from a 4-year retrospective review. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics with the SPSS v26.0 statistical package.
Results: A total of 306 patients were selected. The predominant age group was 21 to 40 years (n=113, 36.9%), 200 (65%) were male and 103 (33.7%) were employees. Observed comorbidities included allergies in 54 (17.6%) and fractures in 29 (9.5%). The most affected areas were the head (n=76, 24.8%) and the right thigh (n=33, 10.8%). Wounds involving bone accounted for 110 cases (36.3%), while muscle involvement was seen in 107 (35.3%). Cultures identified Staphylococcus aureus in 97 (31.7%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in 91 (29.7%). Pain was reported by 205 (68%) patients. Initial treatment consisted of surgical cleansing and debridement in 206 (67.3%); definitive treatment included advanced dressing placement in 104 (34%) and skin graft harvesting and application in 89 (29.1%).
Conclusions: Male patients predominated, with the head being the most frequently affected area. Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were the most common pathogens. The primary initial treatment was surgical cleansing and the leading definitive treatment was advanced dressing placement.
Metrics
References
Franco-Paredes C, Marcos LA, Henao-Martínez AF, Rodríguez-Morales AJ, VillamilGómez WE, Gotuzzo E, et al. Cutaneous Mycobacterial Infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2018;14;32(1):69-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00069-18
Klifto KM, Shetty PN, Slavin BR, Gurno CF, Seal SM, Asif M, et al. Impact of nicotine/smoking, alcohol and illicit substance use on outcomes and complications of burn patients requiring hospital admission: systematic review and meta-analysis. Burns. 2020;46(7):1498-524. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2019.08.003
Aguado Galván EI, Rueda Rangel MT, Meza García CF, Rodríguez Medina RM, Reynaga Ornelas L, Díaz García NY. Perfil epidemiológico en usuarios que pertenecen a la clínica del cuidado de la integridad cutánea en un hospital de tercer nivel, México. Rev. iberoam. Educ. investi. Enferm. 2023;13(4):7-15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56104/Aladafe.2023.13.1021000422
Salud S. Modelo de atención clínicas de heridas de SSA. México: Gobierno de México. 2019.
González IM. Dejar de hacer para poder hacer: Compromiso por la calidad de las Sociedades Científicas. RqR Enfermería Comunitaria. 2018;6(3):18-24.
Ahmed SA, Saleh AA, Nigar I, Khan RR, Ahmed S, Sattar AN, et al. Retrospective study of bacterial profile in wound swab and their susceptibility pattern in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Arch Microbiol Immunol. 2024;8(3):383-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26502/ami.936500185
Kaitlin L, Garza LA. Diverse cellular players orchestrate regeneration after wounding. Exp Dermatol. 2021;30:605-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/exd.14248
WHolly N, Hardman HJ. Wound healing: cellular mechanisms and pathological outcomes. Open Biol. 2020;10:920. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsob.200223
Frykberg RG, Banks J. Challenges in the Treatment of Chronic Wounds. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2015;4(9):560-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2015.0635
Kun YW, Cheng NC. Biofilms in chronic wounds: pathogenesis and diagnosis. Trend Biotechnol. 2019;5:505-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.10.011
Caldwell, Michael D. Bacteria and antibiotics in wound healing. Surgical Clin. 2020;100:757-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2020.05.007
Marco F. Challenges in the management of chronic wound infections. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2021;26:140-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2021.05.010
Jara CA, Paredes DJ, Delgado HR, Martínez JD. Factores y estrategias en la cicatrización y manejo de heridas: Revisión sistemática. Revista Vive. 2025;8(23):831-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33996/revistavive.v8i23.415
Secanho MS, Rajaram R, Villas Boas PJF, Palhares. The impact of frailty and age on older patients undergoing plastic surgery at a quaternary center in Brazil. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025;13(3):6641.
Park JB, Adebagbo OD, Escobar-Domingo MJ. Trends in top surgery patient characteristics, wound complications, and CPT code use by plastic surgeons: a decade-long analysis. Anna Plast Surg. 2024;93(4):530-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004047
Quiroz-Williams J, Antonio-Flores G, Gaytán-Fernández S. Factores de riesgo para el desarrollo de infecciones de herida quirúrgica en pacientes con fracturas cerradas. Ley Ortopédica Mexicana. 2024;38 (6):383-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35366/118290
Vela-Anaya G, Stegensek-Mejía EM, Leija-Hernández C. Características epidemiológicas y costos de la atención de las heridas en unidades médicas de la Secretaría de Salud. Rev Enferm Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2018;26(2):105-14.
Sarfati I, Millochau J, Meredith I, Leroy O, Parra RV, Romano G, et al. Salvaging the infected breast implant: results of a retrospective series of 80 consecutive cases. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020;73(12):2232-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2020.05.042
Tran KN, Jang YJ. Incidence and Predisposing Factors of Postoperative Infection after Rhinoplasty: A Single Surgeon's 16-Year Experience with 2630 Cases in an East Asian Population. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022;150(1):51e-59e. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000009202
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
