Comparative in vitro antibacterial and antifungal efficacy of chemical, herbal and probiotic mouthrinses against Streptococcus mutans and Candida species
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20261344Keywords:
Mouthrinses, Antimicrobial efficacy, Chlorhexidine, Probiotic mouthrinses, Herbal mouthrinses, Chemical mouthrinsesAbstract
Background: Dental caries and oral candidiasis are predominant biofilm-associated infections, primarily driven by Streptococcus mutans and Candida species. While mechanical plaque removal is fundamental, mouthrinses are widely used as adjunctive treatments. This study evaluated and compared the in vitro antibacterial and antifungal efficacy of commercially available chemical, herbal and probiotic mouthrinses against key oral pathogens.
Methods: 15 commercial mouthrinses, comprising five each of chemical, herbal and probiotic formulations were tested against S. mutans MTCC 457, Candida albicans MTCC 227 and clinical isolates of C. albicans, C. tropicalis and Pichia kudriavzevii. Antibacterial and antifungal activity was assessed using the agar well diffusion method. Zones of inhibition were measured following 24 - 48 hours of incubation at 37°C with positive controls penicillin or fluconazole.
Results: Chemical mouthrinses demonstrated the strongest antimicrobial activity, where Hexidine produced the largest mean ZOI, followed by Colgate maXFresh PLAX. Herbal formulations such as Himalaya active fresh and K. P. Namboodiri’s Herbal Fresh showed moderate efficacy. Probiotic mouthrinses displayed limited and selective activity, primarily against S. mutans and non-albicans Candida spp., with Perfora probiotic rinse demonstrating the highest mean ZOI. Several products in each category produced no measurable ZOI.
Conclusions: Chlorhexidine based mouthrinses remain the gold standard for rapid, broad-spectrum microbial reduction. Herbal formulations provide a moderate, phytochemical dependent alternative with a safer profile, while probiotic mouthrinses offer limited but selective antimicrobial effects.
References
Hollmann B, Perkins M, Walsh D. Biofilms and their role in pathogenesis. British Society for Immunology. Available at: https://www.immunology.org/public-information/bitesized-immunology/pathogens-and-disease/biofilms-and-their-role-in. Accessed on 07 August 2025.
Kumar S, Tadakamadla J, Johnson NW. Effect of toothbrushing frequency on incidence and increment of dental caries. J Dent Res. 2016;95:1230-6.
Ryan KJ, Ray CG, editors. Sherris medical microbiology. 4th ed. New York: McGraw Hill. 2004.
Bedran TBL, Azelmat J, Spolidorio DP, Grenier D. Fibrinogen-induced Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation and adherence to endothelial cells. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:1-8.
Watanabe A, Kawada-Matsuo M, Le MNT, Hisatsune J, Oogai Y, Nakano Y, et al. Comprehensive analysis of bacteriocins in Streptococcus mutans. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):1-13.
Hellstein JW, Marek CL. Candidiasis: red and white manifestations in the oral cavity. Head Neck Pathol. 2019;13(1):25-32.
Millsop JW, Fazel N. Oral candidiasis. Clin Dermatol. 2016;34(4):487-94.
Barbieri DdSAV, Vicente VA, Fraiz FC, Lavoranti OJ, Svidzinski TIE, Pinheiro RL. Analysis of the in vitro adherence of Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans. Braz J Microbiol. 2007;38:624-63.
Jarosz LM, Deng DM, van der Mei HC, Crielaard W, Krom BP. Streptococcus mutans competence-stimulating peptide inhibits Candida albicans hypha formation. Eukaryot Cell. 2009;8:1658-64.
Raja M, Hannan A, Ali K. Association of oral candidal carriage with dental caries in children. Caries Res. 2010;44:272-6.
Brogden KM, Guthmiller JM, editors. Polymicrobial diseases. Washington: ASM Press. 2008.
Mealey BL, Oates TW. Diabetes mellitus and periodontal disease. J Periodontol. 2006;77(8):1289-303.
Ciancio SG. Mouthwashes: rationale for use. Am J Dent. 2015;28:4A-8A.
Sykes LM, Comley M, Kelly L. Availability, indications for use and main ingredients of mouthwashes in six major supermarkets in Gauteng. S Afr Dent J. 2016;71(7):308-13.
George VT, Varghese MM, Vaseem MS, Thomas A, George Ittycheria P, Sreejith CK. The promising future of probiotics: a new era in periodontal therapy. J Int Oral Health. 2016;8(3).
Chugh P, Dutt R, Sharma A, Bhagat N, Dhar MS. A critical appraisal of the effects of probiotics on oral health. J Funct Foods. 2020;70:103985.
Nanavati G, Prasanth T, Kosala M, Bhandari SK, Banotra P. Effect of probiotics and prebiotics on oral health. Dent J Adv Stud. 2021;9(1):1-6.
Ribeiro FC, Rossoni RD, de Barros PP, Santos JD, Fugisaki LRO, Leão MPV, et al. Action mechanisms of probiotics on Candida spp. and candidiasis prevention: an update. J Appl Microbiol. 2020;129(2):175-85.
Laleman I, Teughels W. Probiotics in the dental practice: a review. Quintessence Int. 2015;46(3):255-64.
Parkar SM, Thakkar P, Shah K. Antimicrobial activity of four commercially available mouthwashes against Streptococcus mutans: an in vitro study. Univ Res J Dent. 2013;3:108-12.
Talebi S, Sabokbar A, Riazipour M, Saffari M. Comparison of the in vitro effect of chemical and herbal mouthwashes on Candida albicans. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2014;7(12):e12563.
Maziere M, Rompante P, Andrade JC, Rodrigues CF. Are mouthwashes really effective against Candida spp.? J Fungi. 2024;10:528.
Teh JY, Rawi R, Md Noor SS, Taib H, Mohamad S. In-vitro antimicrobial effectiveness of herbal-based mouthrinses against oral microorganisms. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2015;5(5):370-4.
Gursoy UK, Gursoy M, Cakmakci L, Kadayifci A, Kononen E. Anti-biofilm properties of polyphenols in oral biofilms. Curr Med Chem. 2009;16(19):2371-81.
Ezhil I, Sakthi SS. Comparison of antibacterial efficacy of different herbal mouthwashes: an in vitro study. Indian J Public Health Res Dev. 2020;11(6):349-55.
Mishra R, Tandon S, Rathore M, Banerjee M. Antimicrobial efficacy of probiotic and herbal oral rinses against Candida albicans in children: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;9(1):25-30.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
