In-frame versus out-of-frame Duchenne muscular dystrophy deletions: a comparative case report highlighting genotype–phenotype correlation in the therapeutic era

Authors

  • Geerthana Balasubramaniam Department of Biochemistry, B. G. Hospital, Tiruchendur, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Guhan Ramamurthy Department of Neurology, B. G. Hospital, Tiruchendur, Tamil Nadu, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20262660

Keywords:

Duchenne muscular dystrophy, Becker muscular dystrophy, DMD gene, Reading-frame rule, Genotype–phenotype correlation, Exon deletion

Abstract

Dystrophinopathies, including Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD), are X-linked neuromuscular disorders caused by mutations in the DMD gene. We describe two male patients with dystrophinopathies due to large deletions in the DMD gene. Case 1 is a 23-year-old male with adult-onset proximal muscle weakness and preserved ambulation. Genetic analysis revealed an in-frame deletion of exons 45–48, consistent with Becker muscular dystrophy. Case 2 is a 7-year-old child presenting with early-onset progressive muscle weakness, a positive Gower’s sign, loss of ambulation, and markedly elevated creatine kinase levels. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) identified an out-of-frame deletion spanning exons 46–57, confirming a diagnosis of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Reading-frame status produced notably distinct clinical manifestations, despite the same gene and comparable mutational processes. The dystrophin reading-frame rule remains valid in this comparative case report, which also emphasises the importance of accurate molecular diagnosis for prognosis, genetic counselling, and treatment stratification in the era of precision medicine. To our knowledge, comparative genotype–phenotype case documentation from South Asian populations remains limited. This comparative case report adds valuable data from an underrepresented population.

References

Salari N, Fatahi B, Valipour E, Kazeminia M, Fatahian R, Kiaei A, et al. Global prevalence of Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg. 2022;17:96.

Ma YL, Zhang WH, Chen GH, Song LF, Wang Y, Yuan RL, et al. Walking alone milestone combined reading-frame rule improves early prediction of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:985878.

Bladen CL, Salgado D, Monges S, Foncuberta ME, Kekou K, Kosma K, et al. The TREAT-NMD DMD Global Database: analysis of more than 7,000 Duchenne muscular dystrophy mutations. Hum Mutat. 2015;36:395-402.

Aartsma-Rus A, Ginjaar IB, Bushby K. The importance of genetic diagnosis for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Med Genet. 2016;53:145-51.

Koenig M, Beggs AH, Moyer M, Scherpf S, Heindrich K, Bettecken T, et al. The molecular basis for Duchenne versus Becker muscular dystrophy: correlation of severity with type of deletion. Am J Hum Genet. 1989;45:498-506.

Bello L, Pegoraro E. The “Usual Suspects”: Genes for Inflammation, Fibrosis, Regeneration, and Muscle Strength Modify Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. J Clin Med. 2019;8:649.

Pegoraro E, Hoffman EP, Piva L, Gavassini BF, Cagnin S, Ermani M, et al. SPP1 genotype is a determinant of disease severity in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Neurology. 2011;76:219-26.

Schouten JP, McElgunn CJ, Waaijer R, Zwijnenburg D, Diepvens F, Pals G. Relative quantification of 40 nucleic acid sequences by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:e57.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-30

How to Cite

Balasubramaniam, G., & Ramamurthy, G. (2026). In-frame versus out-of-frame Duchenne muscular dystrophy deletions: a comparative case report highlighting genotype–phenotype correlation in the therapeutic era. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 14(8), 3625–3628. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20262660

Issue

Section

Case Reports