The Meek technique versus partial-thickness skin graft in major burns patients: experience in the National Center of Research and Care of Burns Patients in Mexico City
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20261474Keywords:
Meek technique, Partial-thickness skin graft, Major burns, MicrograftingAbstract
Background: The Meek technique, originated in the 1950s by Cicero Parker Meek is one of the most important techniques used in the treatment of major burns, particularly due to the scarcity of donor sites for single skin grafts. Despite advances in the care of burn patients, there is no universally effective treatment, particularly for major burn patients. Meek grafts exhibit reduced susceptibility to loss due to infection, favorable outcomes are achieved, with reported graft survival rates ranging from 86-95%, along with satisfactory functional and aesthetic outcomes. The modified Meek technique was associated with shorter operation times (p=0.04) and a greater expansion ratio (p=0.04). The Meek technique is considered a cornerstone in the treatment of extensive burns, particularly when donor sites are limited for conventional split-thickness skin grafts. Despite advances in burn care, there is still no universally effective treatment for patients with major burns.
Methods: A clinical, observational, cross-sectional study conducted from March 2022 to February 2024, comparing hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit LOS, and outcomes in patients with major burn injuries. We compared these data between the Meek technique (n=11) and split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) (n=27).
Results: Among the patients, in the Meek group (n=11), 6 were male, while in the STSG group (n=27), 18 were male. The mean total body surface area (TBSA) for the Meek group was 63.9±17.9%, and for the STSG group, it was 63.6±19% (p=0.97). The mean LOS at the hospital for the Meek group was 41.1±18 days, while for the STSG group, it was 27.2±22 days (p=0.10). The LOS in the intensive care unit was 32.1±13.1 days for the Meek group and 19.4±11.2 days for the STSG group (p=0.04). A higher frequency of deaths was observed with the STSG technique compared to the Meek technique (59.3% versus 45.5%; p=0.03).
Conclusions: Preliminary results with the Meek technique are encouraging, showing a lower death rate in patients with severe burns. However, the prolonged LOS is a risk factor to consider in this group of patients.
References
Hu G, Guo F, Xi Z, Li-Tsang CW, Zhang JP, Chu W. Efficacy of Two-Stage Meek Micrografting in Patients With Severe Burns. J Burn Care Res. 2022;43(3):616-21.
Rijpma D, van der Vlies CH, van Baar ME, Hop WC, Middelkoop E, Nieuwenhuis MK. The Meek micrograft technique for burns; review on its outcomes. Burns. 2022;48(8):1783-95.
Maruccia M, Elia R, Nisi G, Dessy LA, Manstein D, Giudice G. Meek Micro-Skin Grafting and Acellular Dermal Matrix in Pediatric Patients: A Management of Complex Wounds and Major Burns. J Clin Med. 2023;12(14):4641.
Post NF, Groen K, Rijneveld RH, Luiten RM, Bekkenk MW, van der Vlies CH, et al. Meek micrografting: A novel surgical method for the treatment of vitiligo and piebaldism. JEADV. 2023;37(4):815-21.
Ng JC, Chan JSY, Pang JCY. Meek Micrografting Technique for Reconstruction of Extensive Necrotizing Fasciitis. Arch Plast Surg. 2023;50(2):189-93.
Dahmardehei M, Mirzadeh H, Khorasani G, Kazemnejad S, Salimi M, Mohebali R. Comparison of Modified Meek Technique with Standard Mesh Method in Management of Burn Wounds. World J Plast Surg. 2020;9(3):284-90.
Noureldin MA, El-Bakary AM, El-Hadidy M, El-Sabbagh AH. Comparative study between skin micrografting (Meek technique) and meshed skin grafts in paediatric burns. Burns. 2022;48(5):1171-80.
Medina-Preciado D, Lozano-Guzmán RI. [Epidemiology of burns in Mexico: a public health analysis]. Rev Mex Anestesiol. 2019;42(3):174-5.
Lari AR, Gang RK. Experience with the Meek-Wall technique in the management of extensive burns. Burns. 2001;27(1):61-6.
Zuo H, Zhao X, Liu J. Clinical application of Meek micrografting in the treatment of major burns: A systematic review. J Healthc Eng. 2021;2021:6654321.
Hsieh CS, Chu SY, Oh SJ, Chiang IH, Shieh SJ. The Meek micrograft technique: An alternative for the treatment of extensive burns. J Burn Care Res. 2015;36(5):548-52.
Raff T, Germann G, Barthold U. The Meek-Wall micrograft technique-an update. Burns. 2002;28(8):761-4.
Zhu Z, Chen J, Wei J, Fang J, Liang Z, Wu J. Comparative efficacy of different skin grafting techniques in severe burns: A network meta-analysis. Int Wound J. 2024;21(1):e14456.
Kim YH, Lee JH, Kim YJ. Technical modifications to the Meek technique for improving graft take. Arch Craniofac Surg. 2022;23(4):165-70.
Luo G, Peng Y, Cao J, Wu J. Combined application of Meek micrografting and allograft skin in the treatment of extensive burns. J Burn Care Res. 2020;41(2):331-5.
Wang SY, Zheng BY, Yan XY, Fu ZG, Li-Tsang CW, Zhang JP. Comparing the clinical outcomes of Meek micrografting and microskin grafting. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023;102(12):e33301.
Kurmis R, Liew S, Paul E, Lo CH, Cleland H, Edgar DW. Burn management in adults and children: Current concepts and future directions. J Physiotherapy. 2022;68(3):151-60.
Ellis CV, Kulber DA. Acellular dermal matrices in hand reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(5 Suppl 2):256S-69S.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
