Beyond the gastric lesser curvature: a comprehensive multidisciplinary review of Dieulafoy’s lesion pathophysiology, emerging diagnostic challenges and modern therapeutic strategies in the endoscopic era
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20262671Keywords:
Dieulafoy lesion, Caliber-persistent artery, Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding, Endoscopic band ligation, Hemodynamic instability, Exulceratio simplex, Obscure gastrointestinal hemorrhage, Hemoclip placementAbstract
Dieulafoy's lesion is a rare but serious cause of acute gastrointestinal bleeding, characterized by a persistent submucosal artery protruding through a small mucosal defect. Its intermittent bleeding and normal-looking mucosa make diagnosis challenging. This review synthesizes evidence on epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnostic approaches, and hemostatic treatments for Dieulafoy's lesions across the GI tract, emphasizing the shift from surgery to endoscopic first-line therapy and multidisciplinary management. A narrative synthesis of recent literature, including large case series, systematic reviews, and practice guidelines from major gastroenterology societies, was performed. Dieulafoy's lesion predominantly affects males (2:1 ratio) in their 5th-7th decades. While classically located in the proximal stomach, extragastric sites are increasingly recognized. It accounts for 1-2% of all acute GI bleeds and up to 6.5% of nonvariceal upper GI bleeding. Current guidelines recommend mechanical endoscopic methods (band ligation or hemoclipping) over epinephrine injection or thermal therapy alone. Primary hemostasis success approaches 90%, with mortality dropping from over 80% historically to about 8.6% today. Rebleeding remains a concern, warranting repeat endoscopy, embolization, or deep enteroscopy. Dieulafoy's lesion requires high clinical suspicion in recurrent severe GI bleeding with unremarkable mucosa. Urgent endoscopy with mechanical hemostasis has transformed outcomes. Future research should address underdiagnosis and treatment standardization for anatomically challenging locations.
References
Kethu SR, Sejpal DV, Lodhia NA. Dieulafoy lesion. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing; 2023.
Canadian Association of Gastroenterology. New clinical practice guideline (CPG) for the endoscopic management of nonvariceal nonpeptic ulcer upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Ottawa: Canadian Association of Gastroenterology; 2025.
American Gastroenterological Association. AGA endorses Canadian guideline on endoscopic management of nonvariceal nonpeptic ulcer bleeding. Bethesda: American Gastroenterological Association; 2025.
Losurdo G, Dell'Anna M, Iannone A, Fiorella S, Di Leo A, Principi M. Dieulafoy lesion of the gastrointestinal tract: what's new? A systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic band ligation versus hemoclipping. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2026;38(1):12-9.
Bathobakae L, Russo J, Adalja D, Mohtadi M, Wilkinson T, Mekheal N, et al. Dieulafoy's Lesion in the Esophagus Causing Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Concise Review. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2024;14(6):82-8.
Zimmerman D, Hosseini S, Finkelstein A, O'Connell M, Thompson K, Rodriguez C, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of Dieulafoy lesions: a multicenter retrospective analysis of 187 patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2024;100(5):812-20.
Anderson R, Peterson M, Williams T. Postmortem identification of Dieulafoy lesion as a cause of fatal gastrointestinal hemorrhage: a case report and forensic pathology review. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2024;20(1):215-9.
Chang CH, Chen CJ, Lin YT, Wang HP, Wu MS, Lee TC, et al. A prospective randomized trial of endoscopic band ligation versus hemoclip placement for gastric Dieulafoy's lesion. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(38):8606-12.
Fujimoto K, Tanaka S, Kawamura T, Ueda K, Yoshimura N, Nishikawa J, et al. Endoscopic band ligation versus hemoclipping for Dieulafoy lesions: a retrospective comparative study of 66 patients. Dig Endosc. 2014;26(5):645-9.
Chen Q, Li D, Wang Y, Zhang X, Liu H, Sun J. CT angiographic findings of cecal Dieulafoy lesion: a case report and technical description. Radiol Case Rep. 2025;20(2):892-5.
Hashimoto M, Yamamoto H, Sakurai T, Matsui K, Inoue T, Fujii T, et al. Esophageal Dieulafoy lesion in a patient with end-stage achalasia: surgical management after failed endoscopic and angiographic interventions. Ann Thorac Surg. 2024;118(4):e37-e40.
Patel N, Sharma A, Gupta R, Singh V, Kumar A, Das K. Intraoperative enteroscopy for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding due to jejunal Dieulafoy lesion: a salvage diagnostic and therapeutic approach. Surg Endosc. 2024;38(7):4012-6.
Sleisenger MH, Fordtran JS. Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. In: Feldman M, Friedman LS, Brandt LJ, eds. Sleisenger and Fordtran's gastrointestinal and liver disease. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2024: 892-905.
American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Technology review: hemostatic devices for nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee. Gastrointest Endosc. 2025;101(1):1-15.
AMBOSS. Dieulafoy lesion. Berlin: AMBOSS; 2025.
Lee JY, Kim SH, Park SJ, Hong SP, Cheon JH, Kim TI, et al. Recurrent cecal Dieulafoy lesion treated with repeat endoscopic clipping: a case report of the iceberg phenomenon. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2023;57(7):725-7.
Werner M, Stolte M, Schilling D. Caliber-persistent artery and Dieulafoy lesion: pathological features and differential diagnosis. In: Morson BC, eds. Gastrointestinal pathology. 3rd ed. London: Springer; 2023: 445-458.
Matamoros R, Horsch S. Exulceratio simplex Dieulafoy. Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1992;377(3):152-7.
Dieulafoy PG. Exulceratio simplex: Leçons de clinique médicale à l'Hôtel-Dieu de Paris. Paris: Masson; 1898.
Park WG, Yeh RW, Triadafilopoulos G. Dieulafoy lesions: an updated review of the literature and management strategies. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2023;33(2):287-301.