Comparison of conventional radiograph with low-dose computed tomography of sacroiliac joints in patients with proven sacroiliitis

Authors

  • Rupa Sarkar Department of Radiodiagnosis, Army Hospital Research and Referral, Delhi Cantt., New Delhi, India
  • Debraj Sen Department of Radiodiagnosis, Army Hospital Research and Referral, Delhi Cantt., New Delhi, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20262635

Keywords:

Axial spondyloarthritis, Conventional radiography, Low-dose computed tomography, Sacroiliac joint, Sacroiliitis

Abstract

Background: Sacroiliitis is central to diagnosing axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), yet conventional radiography suffers from anatomical superimposition and low sensitivity for early structural change. Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) provides cross-sectional detail at a radiation dose comparable to plain radiography. Aim was to evaluate LDCT versus conventional sacroiliac (SI) joint radiography in assessing sacroiliitis.

Methods: This prospective, observational, cross-sectional study enrolled 30 consecutive adults with proven sacroiliitis at a tertiary centre. All underwent pelvic radiography (SAPA view) and LDCT of the SI joints (Philips Brilliance iCT 256-slice; 120 kV, 30 mAs; effective dose ~1 mSv). Two blinded radiologists independently scored 60 SI joints using a modified European image-quality system covering technical parameters (joint-margin and soft-tissue delineation, superior/inferior visualisation, absence of superimposition) and pathological parameters (joint-space change, erosions, sclerosis, soft-tissue content). Chi-square/Fisher’s exact and unpaired t-tests were used; p<0.05 was significant.

Results: Mean age was 33.1±8.7 years; 96.7% were male; axSpA accounted for 90.0% of diagnoses. LDCT was significantly superior to radiography for soft-tissue delineation (98.3% versus 18.3%), superior/inferior joint margins (98.3% versus 55.0%), absence of superimposition (100% versus 36.7%), and iliac-margin erosion detection (86.7% versus 55.0%) (all p<0.001). Mean total imaging score was 7.6±1.3 for LDCT versus 4.3±1.8 for radiography (p<0.001), with consistent superiority across all subgroups; scores correlated strongly (r=0.742, p<0.001).

Conclusions: LDCT delivered substantially superior image quality and structural-lesion detection than radiography at a comparable dose and should be integrated into diagnostic algorithms for suspected sacroiliitis, particularly when radiographs are inconclusive.

References

Balagué F, Mannion AF, Pellissé F, Cedraschi C. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet. 2012;379(9814):482-91.

GBD 2021 Low Back Pain Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of low back pain, 1990-2020, its attributable risk factors, and projections to 2050: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Rheumatol. 2023;5(6):e316-29.

Wong M, Sinkler MA, Kiel J. Anatomy, abdomen and pelvis, sacroiliac joint. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021.

Miller P, Kendrick D, Bentley E, Fielding K. Cost-effectiveness of lumbar spine radiography in primary care patients with low back pain. Spine. 2002;27(20):2291-7.

Sieper J, Rudwaleit M, Baraliakos X, Brandt J, Braun J, Burgos-Vargas R, et al. The assessment of spondyloarthritis international society (ASAS) handbook: a guide to assess spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(Suppl 2):ii1-44.

Rudwaleit M, van der Heijde D, Landewé R, Listing J, Akkoc N, Brandt J, et al. The assessment of spondyloarthritis international society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis: a systematic review. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(6):777-83.

Mahnken AH, Wildberger JE, Gehbauer G, Schmitz-Rode T, Blaum M, Fabry U, et al. Multidetector CT of the spine in multiple myeloma: comparison with MR imaging and radiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178(6):1429-36.

Biswas D, Bible JE, Bohan M, Simpson AK, Whang PG, Grauer JN. Radiation exposure from musculoskeletal computerized tomographic scans. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(8):1882-9.

McCollough CH, Chen GH, Kalender W, Leng S, Samei E, Taguchi K, et al. Achieving routine submillisievert CT scanning: report from the summit on management of radiation dose in CT. Radiology. 2012;264(2):567-80.

Thrall JH. Radiation exposure in CT scanning and risk: where are we? Radiology. 2012;264(2):325-8.

Warncke ML, Wiese NJ, Tahir E, Sehner S, Heinemann A, Regier M, et al. Highly reduced-dose CT of the lumbar spine in a human cadaver model. PLoS One. 2020;15(10):e0240199.

Klauser AS, Feuchtner GM, Jaschke WR. Low-dose CT of the sacroiliac joints in patients with suspected spondyloarthritis: diagnostic performance and comparison with conventional radiography. Radiology. 2012;265(3):892-900.

Weber U, Jürik AG, Lambert RGW, Maksymowych WP. Comparison of conventional radiography, MRI, and low-dose CT in the assessment of structural lesions in sacroiliitis. Arth Rheumatol. 2015;67(7):1800-10.

Weber U, Lambert RG, Østergaard M, Pedersen SJ, Hodler J, Jürik AG, et al. MRI in the early diagnosis of sacroiliitis in patients with axial spondyloarthritis. Arth Rheumatol. 2014;66(6):1430-8.

Alshamari M, Geijer M, Norrman E, Geijer H. Low-dose CT of the lumbar spine compared with radiography: a study on image quality with implications for clinical practice. Acta Radiol. 2016;57(5):602-11.

Sieper J, Rudwaleit M, Baraliakos X, Brandt J, Braun J, Burgos-Vargas R, et al. The assessment of sacroiliitis by conventional radiography in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: reliability and observer variability. Arth Rheumatol. 2009;61(1):100-7.

Weber U, Jürik AG, Østergaard M, Pedersen SJ, Lambert RGW, Maksymowych WP. Diagnostic performance of low-dose CT for structural lesions in the sacroiliac joints of patients with axial spondyloarthritis. Arth Res Ther. 2016;18:106.

Alshamari M, Geijer M, Norrman E, Geijer H. Low-dose computed tomography of the lumbar spine: a phantom study on imaging parameters and image quality. Acta Radiol. 2014;55(7):824-32.

Klauser AS, Faschingbauer R, Suss C, Suss D, Tegethoff M, Schmidauer C. Erosions of the sacroiliac joints in axial spondyloarthritis: evaluation by low-dose CT. Rheumatology. 2013;52(5):936-42.

Baraliakos X, van der Heijde D, Sieper J, Landewé R, Rudwaleit M, Braun J. Radiation dose and clinical utility of low-dose CT versus radiography for structural assessment of the sacroiliac joints. Clin Rheumatol. 2015;34(1):123-30.

Lambert RGW, Bakker PAC, Østergaard M, Pedersen SJ, Maksymowych WP. Optimizing CT protocols for low-dose sacroiliac joint imaging: radiation exposure and diagnostic quality. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(7):2001-8.

Sieper J, Rudwaleit M, Baraliakos X, Hermann KG, Schmidt M, Maksymowych WP. Diagnostic value of CT and MRI versus conventional radiography for structural sacroiliitis: a comparative study. Arth Care Res. 2014;66(2):164-72.

Maksymowych WP, Lambert RGW. Imaging in axial spondyloarthritis: MRI and CT for inflammatory and structural lesions. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2014;26(4):342-50.

Maksymowych WP, Lambert RGW, Østergaard M. Imaging in the diagnosis and monitoring of axial spondyloarthritis: current state and perspectives. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2017;13(4):194-205.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-30

How to Cite

Sarkar, R., & Sen, D. (2026). Comparison of conventional radiograph with low-dose computed tomography of sacroiliac joints in patients with proven sacroiliitis. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 14(8), 3453–3458. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20262635

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles