Comparison of conventional radiograph with low-dose computed tomography of sacroiliac joints in patients with proven sacroiliitis

Rupa Sarkar; Debraj Sen

doi:10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20262635

Authors

Rupa Sarkar Department of Radiodiagnosis, Army Hospital Research and Referral, Delhi Cantt., New Delhi, India
Debraj Sen Department of Radiodiagnosis, Army Hospital Research and Referral, Delhi Cantt., New Delhi, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20262635

Keywords:

Axial spondyloarthritis, Conventional radiography, Low-dose computed tomography, Sacroiliac joint, Sacroiliitis

Abstract

Background: Sacroiliitis is central to diagnosing axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), yet conventional radiography suffers from anatomical superimposition and low sensitivity for early structural change. Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) provides cross-sectional detail at a radiation dose comparable to plain radiography. Aim was to evaluate LDCT versus conventional sacroiliac (SI) joint radiography in assessing sacroiliitis.

Methods: This prospective, observational, cross-sectional study enrolled 30 consecutive adults with proven sacroiliitis at a tertiary centre. All underwent pelvic radiography (SAPA view) and LDCT of the SI joints (Philips Brilliance iCT 256-slice; 120 kV, 30 mAs; effective dose ~1 mSv). Two blinded radiologists independently scored 60 SI joints using a modified European image-quality system covering technical parameters (joint-margin and soft-tissue delineation, superior/inferior visualisation, absence of superimposition) and pathological parameters (joint-space change, erosions, sclerosis, soft-tissue content). Chi-square/Fisher’s exact and unpaired t-tests were used; p<0.05 was significant.

Results: Mean age was 33.1±8.7 years; 96.7% were male; axSpA accounted for 90.0% of diagnoses. LDCT was significantly superior to radiography for soft-tissue delineation (98.3% versus 18.3%), superior/inferior joint margins (98.3% versus 55.0%), absence of superimposition (100% versus 36.7%), and iliac-margin erosion detection (86.7% versus 55.0%) (all p<0.001). Mean total imaging score was 7.6±1.3 for LDCT versus 4.3±1.8 for radiography (p<0.001), with consistent superiority across all subgroups; scores correlated strongly (r=0.742, p<0.001).

Conclusions: LDCT delivered substantially superior image quality and structural-lesion detection than radiography at a comparable dose and should be integrated into diagnostic algorithms for suspected sacroiliitis, particularly when radiographs are inconclusive.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Balagué F, Mannion AF, Pellissé F, Cedraschi C. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet. 2012;379(9814):482-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60610-7

GBD 2021 Low Back Pain Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of low back pain, 1990-2020, its attributable risk factors, and projections to 2050: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Rheumatol. 2023;5(6):e316-29.

Wong M, Sinkler MA, Kiel J. Anatomy, abdomen and pelvis, sacroiliac joint. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021.

Miller P, Kendrick D, Bentley E, Fielding K. Cost-effectiveness of lumbar spine radiography in primary care patients with low back pain. Spine. 2002;27(20):2291-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200210150-00021

Sieper J, Rudwaleit M, Baraliakos X, Brandt J, Braun J, Burgos-Vargas R, et al. The assessment of spondyloarthritis international society (ASAS) handbook: a guide to assess spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(Suppl 2):ii1-44.

Rudwaleit M, van der Heijde D, Landewé R, Listing J, Akkoc N, Brandt J, et al. The assessment of spondyloarthritis international society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis: a systematic review. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(6):777-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2009.108233

Mahnken AH, Wildberger JE, Gehbauer G, Schmitz-Rode T, Blaum M, Fabry U, et al. Multidetector CT of the spine in multiple myeloma: comparison with MR imaging and radiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178(6):1429-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.178.6.1781429

Biswas D, Bible JE, Bohan M, Simpson AK, Whang PG, Grauer JN. Radiation exposure from musculoskeletal computerized tomographic scans. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(8):1882-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.01199

McCollough CH, Chen GH, Kalender W, Leng S, Samei E, Taguchi K, et al. Achieving routine submillisievert CT scanning: report from the summit on management of radiation dose in CT. Radiology. 2012;264(2):567-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12112265

Thrall JH. Radiation exposure in CT scanning and risk: where are we? Radiology. 2012;264(2):325-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12121137

Warncke ML, Wiese NJ, Tahir E, Sehner S, Heinemann A, Regier M, et al. Highly reduced-dose CT of the lumbar spine in a human cadaver model. PLoS One. 2020;15(10):e0240199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240199

Klauser AS, Feuchtner GM, Jaschke WR. Low-dose CT of the sacroiliac joints in patients with suspected spondyloarthritis: diagnostic performance and comparison with conventional radiography. Radiology. 2012;265(3):892-900.

Weber U, Jürik AG, Lambert RGW, Maksymowych WP. Comparison of conventional radiography, MRI, and low-dose CT in the assessment of structural lesions in sacroiliitis. Arth Rheumatol. 2015;67(7):1800-10.

Weber U, Lambert RG, Østergaard M, Pedersen SJ, Hodler J, Jürik AG, et al. MRI in the early diagnosis of sacroiliitis in patients with axial spondyloarthritis. Arth Rheumatol. 2014;66(6):1430-8.

Alshamari M, Geijer M, Norrman E, Geijer H. Low-dose CT of the lumbar spine compared with radiography: a study on image quality with implications for clinical practice. Acta Radiol. 2016;57(5):602-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185115595667

Sieper J, Rudwaleit M, Baraliakos X, Brandt J, Braun J, Burgos-Vargas R, et al. The assessment of sacroiliitis by conventional radiography in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: reliability and observer variability. Arth Rheumatol. 2009;61(1):100-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2008.104018

Weber U, Jürik AG, Østergaard M, Pedersen SJ, Lambert RGW, Maksymowych WP. Diagnostic performance of low-dose CT for structural lesions in the sacroiliac joints of patients with axial spondyloarthritis. Arth Res Ther. 2016;18:106.

Alshamari M, Geijer M, Norrman E, Geijer H. Low-dose computed tomography of the lumbar spine: a phantom study on imaging parameters and image quality. Acta Radiol. 2014;55(7):824-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185113509615

Klauser AS, Faschingbauer R, Suss C, Suss D, Tegethoff M, Schmidauer C. Erosions of the sacroiliac joints in axial spondyloarthritis: evaluation by low-dose CT. Rheumatology. 2013;52(5):936-42.

Baraliakos X, van der Heijde D, Sieper J, Landewé R, Rudwaleit M, Braun J. Radiation dose and clinical utility of low-dose CT versus radiography for structural assessment of the sacroiliac joints. Clin Rheumatol. 2015;34(1):123-30.

Lambert RGW, Bakker PAC, Østergaard M, Pedersen SJ, Maksymowych WP. Optimizing CT protocols for low-dose sacroiliac joint imaging: radiation exposure and diagnostic quality. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(7):2001-8.

Sieper J, Rudwaleit M, Baraliakos X, Hermann KG, Schmidt M, Maksymowych WP. Diagnostic value of CT and MRI versus conventional radiography for structural sacroiliitis: a comparative study. Arth Care Res. 2014;66(2):164-72.

Maksymowych WP, Lambert RGW. Imaging in axial spondyloarthritis: MRI and CT for inflammatory and structural lesions. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2014;26(4):342-50.

Maksymowych WP, Lambert RGW, Østergaard M. Imaging in the diagnosis and monitoring of axial spondyloarthritis: current state and perspectives. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2017;13(4):194-205.