Satisfaction in rhinoplasty patients using costal and septal graft: presentation of cases

Authors

  • Manuel Enrique de la O. Escamilla Servicio de Cirugia Plastica y Reconstructiva, Hospital General de México “Dr. Eduardo Liceaga”, Ciudad de México, México
  • Jorge Morales Servicio de Cirugia Plastica y Reconstructiva, Hospital General de México “Dr. Eduardo Liceaga”, Ciudad de México, México
  • Raymundo Torres Servicio de Cirugia Plastica y Reconstructiva, Hospital General de México “Dr. Eduardo Liceaga”, Ciudad de México, México

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20261862

Keywords:

Rhinoplasty, Graft, Body satisfaction, Personal satisfaction, Nose, Nasal surgical procedures

Abstract

Rhinoplasty is one of the most frequently performed procedures in plastic and reconstructive surgery, with both aesthetic and functional implications. The use of cartilaginous grafts has become a fundamental tool to achieve structural stability, nasal definition, and long-term support. However, evidence regarding the association between graft origin and patient-reported aesthetic satisfaction remains limited. A case series of 16 patients who underwent rhinoplasty with cartilaginous graft was conducted, classified according to the origin of the graft as costal (n=9) or septal (n=7). The median preoperative satisfaction score was 3.5 (IQR=6), rising to 7.5 (IQR=2) postoperatively, representing a statistically significant improvement (p=0.0007). Patients with costal graft showed a median postoperative satisfaction of 7 (IQR=5.5), while those with septal graft showed a median of 9 (IQR=2), with no statistically significant difference between groups (p=0.2237). A descriptive tendency toward reduced nasal congestion and obstruction was also observed postoperatively.  Rhinoplasty with cartilaginous graft significantly improves patient aesthetic self-perception regardless of graft origin. No significant difference in postoperative satisfaction was found between costal and septal grafts. Future studies with larger samples and homogeneous graft combinations are needed.

References

Hohman MH, Fichman M, Piedra Buena IT. Rhinoplasty. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. 2026.

Rot P, Krzywdzińska S, Grab P, Jurkiewicz D, Chloupek A, Sobol M. The Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) Questionnaire in Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2024;13(16).

Francisco Javier CP, Emilio Ruben LV, Salinas Perea R, Elisa Regina PM, Villamar Gutiérrez CA, Mendoza FG, et al. Comprehensive Overview of Nasal Grafting in Rhinoplasty and Nasal Reconstruction: Techniques, Indications, and Complications. Int J Med Sci Clin Res Stud. 2025;5(07):1259-64.

Wang Q, Liu J, Chen Z. Clinical outcomes of rib graft use in rhinoplasty: a meta-analysis. BMC Surg. 2025;25(1):314.

Rot P, Krzywdzińska S, Grab P, Jurkiewicz D, Chloupek A, Sobol M. The Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) Questionnaire in Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2024;13(16):4642.

Rezaei F, Rezaei F, Abbasi H, Moradi H. A Comparison of Doctor/Patient Satisfaction with Aesthetic Outcomes of Rhinoplasty: a Prospective Study. J Med Life. 2019;12(4):374-80.

Alanezi MN, Al-Ayadhi LY, Alghamdi HA, Almaiman NI, Halepoto DM, Alali MA, et al. Assessment of Postoperative Satisfaction in Patients Following Rhinoplasty: A Cross-sectional Study. Plast Reconstruct Surg Glob Open. 2025;13(10):e7210.

Obeid M, Obeid I, Adi M, Al-kurdi M, Jawad A, Ismaeel M, et al. Impact of Rhinoplasty on Nasal Breathing and Olfactory Function: A Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Study. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2025;49(13):3658-70.

Omer G, Girolamo S, Hamatofiq B, Tofiq S, Mohammed MA, Abdulkarim D, et al. Functional, Cosmetic, and Psychological Outcomes after Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024;12(8):e6057.

Beltrán Vidal MP, Silva Salazar MA, Toapanta Correa LA, Calle Agurto JA. Eficacia del uso del injerto cartilaginoso en rinoplastia: una revisión sistemática. Revista InveCom. 2026;6(2).

Wähmann MS, Bulut OC, Bran GM, Veit JA, Riedel F. Systematic Review of Quality-of-Life Measurement After Aesthetic Rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018;42(6):1635-47.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-16

How to Cite

Escamilla, M. E. de la O., Morales, J., & Torres, R. (2026). Satisfaction in rhinoplasty patients using costal and septal graft: presentation of cases. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20261862

Issue

Section

Case Series