Diagnostic performance of ACR TI-RADS in solitary thyroid nodule: a comparative study with FNAC in a tertiary care hospital in Bangladesh
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20263091Keywords:
ACR TI-RADS, Bethesda system, Bangladesh, Diagnostic accuracy, FNAC, Thyroid noduleAbstract
Background: Thyroid nodules are highly prevalent in iodine-deficient regions in Bangladesh. The American college of radiology thyroid imaging reporting and data system (ACR TI-RADS) offers a standardized, non-invasive ultrasound-based risk stratification tool. This study evaluates its diagnostic accuracy against Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC), the gold standard.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from April 2025 to March 2026 at BIRDEM General Hospital, Dhaka. A total of 85 adult patients (≥18 years) with solitary thyroid nodule underwent high-resolution USG for ACR TI-RADS grading, followed by USG-guided FNAC (Bethesda classification). Diagnostic accuracy metrics sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated using FNAC as the reference standard.
Results: Among 85 participants, females constituted 81.2% with a male-to-female ratio of 1:4.3. The mean age was 43.6±11.8 years. ACR TI-RADS distribution: TR2 (19.0%), TR3 (35.3%), TR4 (27.0%), TR5 (18.7%). FNAC revealed suspicious for follicular neoplasm (2.4%) and non-diagnostic (3.5%). Using TR≥4 as the cut-off for malignancy (n=82 after excluding non-diagnostic cases), ACR TI-RADS demonstrated: sensitivity 85.7%, specificity 80.88%, PPV 48.00%, NPV 96.49%, accuracy 81.71%, positive likelihood ratio (LR+) 4.48, negative likelihood ratio (LR−) 0.18 and AUC 0.862 (p<0.001).
Conclusions: ACR TI-RADS exhibits excellent negative predictive value (96.49%) and a strong negative likelihood ratio (0.18), confirming its high reliability as a rule-out test for malignancy in solitary thyroid nodule. Low-risk (TR1–3) nodules can be safely managed with sonographic surveillance, while high-risk (TR4–5) nodules warrant FNAC confirmation.
References
De D, Dutta S, Tarafdar S, Kar SS, Das U, Basu K, et al. Comparison between sonographic features and fine needle aspiration cytology with histopathology in the diagnosis of solitary thyroid nodule. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2020;24(4):349-54.
Bailey S, Wallwork B. Differentiating between benign and malignant thyroid nodules: An evidence-based approach in general practice. Aust J Gen Pract. 2018;47(11):770-4.
Pompili GG, Tresoldi S, Ravelli A, Primolevo A, Di Leo G, Carrafiello G. Use of the ultrasound-based total malignancy score in the management of thyroid nodules. Ultrasonography. 2018;37(4):315-22.
Mamun AA, Alam Z, Islam M, Mahamud M, Rahman M, Aich ML. Study of pathological variations of solitary thyroid nodule. Bangladesh J Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;24(2):105-14.
Hoang JK, Middleton WD, Farjat AE, Langer JE, Reading CC, Teefey SA, et al. Reduction in thyroid nodule biopsies and improved accuracy with American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System. Radiology. 2018;287(1):185-93.
Horvath E, Silva CF, Majlis S, Rodriguez I, Skoknic V, Castro A, et al. Prospective validation of the ultrasound-based TIRADS classification: Results in surgically resected thyroid nodules. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(6):2619-28.
Singaporewalla RM, Hwee J, Lang TU, Desai V. Clinico-pathological correlation of thyroid nodule ultrasound and cytology using the TIRADS and Bethesda classifications. World J Surg. 2017;41(7):1807-11.
Jones SR, Carley S, Harrison M. An introduction to power and sample size estimation. Emerg Med J. 2003;20(5):453-458.
Cibas ES, Ali SZ. The 2017 Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology. Thyroid. 2017;27(11):1341-6.
Rathore YS, Puri G, Yadav S, Agarwal S, Yyas S, Kataria K, et al. Evaluation of concordance of ultrasound, cytology and histopathology in solitary thyroid nodules. Indian J Endocrine Surg Res. 2023;18(1):19-23.
Foroughi AA, Mokhtari M, Heidari E, Nazeri M, Rastgouyan H, Babaei A. Concordance between TIRADS and cytology in thyroid nodules. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2022;34(125):295-302.
Omran HM, El-Shafei MA, El-Badawy NM, Bassiouny AM, Abd Elrahman MA, El-Rifai AY. Correlation between thyroid image reporting and data system and fine-needle aspiration cytology in the assessment of suspicious thyroid nodules. Egyptian J Surg. 2021;40(4):1289-94.
Tuladhar AS, Pudasaini S, Simkhada S, Shrestha A, Pradhan S. Correlation of American College of Radiology (ACR)-Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) findings in USG of thyroid nodules with FNAC or Biopsy findings. Nepal Med Coll J. 2022;24(1):23-9.
Hoang JK, Langer JE, Middleton WD, Wu CC, Hammers LW, Cronan JJ, et al. Managing incidental thyroid nodules detected on imaging: white paper of the ACR incidental thyroid findings committee. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015;12(2):143-50.
Pabalan D, Quimbo RV. Agreement between sonographic features and fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules in a tertiary hospital. PJP. 2024;9(1):37-41.
Hussein MA, Elesawy YF, Ghoweba DEAR, Mousa S. Correlation of ultrasound features in the TIRADS scoring system with cytological findings in the FNAC of thyroid nodules. Egyptian J Intern Med. 2024;36(1):29.
D’Silva RM, Suresh H, Jayaprakash C. Correlation between American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System and Bethesda Scoring System in evaluation of thyroid nodules. Int J Anat Radiol Surg. 2023;12(1):1-7.
Periakaruppan G, Seshadri KG, Vignesh KGM, Mandava R, Sai VPM, Rajendiran S. Correlation between ultrasound-based TIRADS and Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: 2-year experience at a tertiary care center in India. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2018;22(5):651-5.
Mandal D, Mallik R, Dey S, Lama KY. Sonographic evaluation of thyroid nodule based on thyroid imaging reporting and data system classification and its correlation with fine needle aspiration cytology findings. Int J Res Med Sci. 2024;12:1957-63.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
