Effect of neural mobilization of musculocutaneous nerve on spasticity of elbow flexors in post-stroke patients: a pilot study

Adelin Preety Yesudhas Shanthi; V. Balchandar

doi:10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20263512

Authors

Adelin Preety Yesudhas Shanthi Department of Neurological Sciences, Jaya College of Physiotherapy, Jaya College of Paramedical Sciences, C.T.H. Road, Thiruninravur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
V. Balchandar Jaya College of Physiotherapy, Jaya College of Paramedical Sciences, C.T.H. Road, Thiruninravur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7181-1778

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20263512

Keywords:

Stroke rehabilitation, Spasticity, Musculocutaneous nerve, Neural mobilization, Surface electromyography, Range of motion

Abstract

Background: While neural mobilization shows promise, its effect on the musculocutaneous nerve remains underexplored. This pilot study evaluated the clinical effectiveness of musculocutaneous nerve mobilization on elbow flexor spasticity in chronic post-stroke individuals.

Methods: Eighteen chronic stroke survivors with elbow flexor spasticity were randomly assigned to Group A (experimental, n=9) or Group B (control, n=9). Group A received musculocutaneous nerve mobilization plus concurrent physiotherapy; Group B received structured elbow flexor stretching plus concurrent physiotherapy. Both interventions were delivered 5 times weekly for 6 weeks (45 minutes/ session). Outcome measures included surface electromyography (sEMG) root mean square difference (RMSD) of the biceps and brachialis, the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), and goniometric range of motion (ROM) for elbow flexion and extension lags.

Results: Both groups demonstrated statistically significant within-group improvements across all clinical and objective metrics (p<0.05 for MAS; p<0.001 for sEMG and ROM). Between-group analyses did not reach statistical significance for any outcome measure (p>0.05). However, Group A demonstrated a distinct clinical trend toward superior outcomes, achieving greater mean reductions in Biceps sEMG (7.57 μV to 4.80 μV vs. Group B: 8.36 μV to 6.68 μV) and greater decreases in flexion (15.22)^∘ with 15.22° and (7.33)^∘ with 7.33°.

Conclusion: Musculocutaneous nerve mobilization is a safe, clinically valuable intervention for post-stroke elbow spasticity. Though between-group statistical significance was limited by the pilot sample size, the technique showed superior descriptive clinical trends compared to stretching.

References

Kamalakannan S, Gudlavalleti AS, Gudlavalleti VS, Goenka S, Kuper H. Incidence & prevalence of stroke in India: a systematic review. Indian J Med Res. 2017;146(2):175-85.

Feigin VL, Stark BA, Johnson CO, Roth GA, Bisignano C, Abady GG, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20(10):795-820

Kalita J, Bharadwaz MP, Aditi A. Prevalence, contributing factors, and economic implications of strokes among older adults: a study of North-East India. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):16880.

Subhashini K, Surapaneni D, Jagadeesan M. Biomarkers of hemorrhagic transformation of acute ischemic stroke – a cross-sectional study. Rom Med J. 2024;71(2):127-32.

Simon J, Sriharsha T, Kumaresan AP, Chand U, Bose S. Impact of vitamin D deficiency on ischemic stroke severity: insights from a prospective study. Cureus. 2024;16(9):e69376.

Reddy KSS, Varadaraj P, Senthilnathan S, Vivekanandan T, Gunasekaran N. Evaluating the coagulation parameters in acute ischemic versus hemorrhagic stroke patients upon hospital admission. Rom J Med Pract. 2024;19(3):274-8.

Platz T. Clinical pathways in stroke rehabilitation: evidence-based clinical practice recommendations. Cham: Springer; 2021.

Ghai A, Garg N, Hooda S, Gupta T. Spasticity–pathogenesis, prevention and treatment strategies. Saudi J Anaesth. 2013;7(4):453-60.

Wissel J, Manack A, Brainin M. Toward an epidemiology of poststroke spasticity. Neurology. 2013;80(3 Suppl 2):S13-19.

Opheim A, Danielsson A, Murphy MA, Persson HC, Sunnerhagen KS. Upper-limb spasticity during the first year after stroke: stroke arm longitudinal study at the University of Gothenburg. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;93(10):884-96.

Butler DS, Jones MA. Mobilisation of the nervous system. Melbourne: Churchill Livingstone; 1991.

Blessy KM, Kumerasan A. Quality of life after stroke patients with disability. Indian J Public Health Res Dev. 2019;10(12):877-80.

Saloni Rambachan RK, Srinivasan V, Suganthirababu P. Efficacy of dry needling in enhancing hand function and reducing spasticity in MCA stroke patients: a prospective case report. Int J Exp Res Rev. 2024;42:162-8.

Suganthirababu P, Prathap L, Alagesan J. Recent trends in applying functional electrical stimulation in the management of spastic paraplegia induced by spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Physiother Q. 2023;31(1):58-64.

Shahid J, Kashif A, Shahid MK. A comprehensive review of physical therapy interventions for stroke rehabilitation: impairment-based approaches and functional goals. Brain Sci. 2023;13(5):717.

Babu S, Manavalan K, DB D. Knowledge and practice of post stroke rehabilition, stress and burden among care givers of stroke patients. Community Practitioner. 2024;21:1062-72.

Vishnuram S, Kumaresan A, Suganthirababu P, Ramalingam V, Srinivasan V, Alagesan J. Effect of peripheral nerve mobilization and VR-based gait training on gait parameters among patients with chronic ACA stroke – a pilot study. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr. 2024;42:470-80.

Kotteeswaran K, Virupakshi G. Efficacy of neurodynamic treatment on pain and ROM (SLR) in subjects with low back pain associated with sciatica. Biomedicine (India). 2017;37:382-7.

Tedeschi R. Exploring the efficacy of neural mobilization and electromyographic analysis in enhancing post-stroke rehabilitation: a scoping review. Rehabilitación. 2025;59(1):100889.

Albani G, Be SV, Bar D, Campanelli L, Be RG, Mauro A. Use of surface EMG for evaluation of upper limb spasticity during botulinum toxin therapy in stroke patients. Funct Neurol. 2010;25(2):103.

Schinwelski M, Sławek J. Prevalence of spasticity following stroke and its impact on quality of life with emphasis on disability in activities of daily living. Systematic review. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2010;44(4):404-11.

Prabakar J. Knowledge, awareness and risk factors for hypertension among non-medical students in Chennai - A cross-sectional survey. J Complement Med Res. 2020;11(1):210-6.

MK Javeed, Parthiban K, Natarajan V, Nambi S. A case report on sodium valproate induced young onset hypertension in a case of mania. Malaysian J Med Health Sci. 2024 Dec;20(Suppl 13):96-9.

Sommerfeld DK, Eek EU, Svensson AK, Holmqvist LW, Von Arbin MH. Spasticity after stroke: its occurrence and association with motor impairments and activity limitations. Stroke. 2004;35(1):134-9.

Pundik S, McCabe J, Skelly M, Tatsuoka C, Daly JJ. Association of spasticity and motor dysfunction in chronic stroke. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2019;62(6):397-402.

Castilho J, Ferreira LA, Pereira WM, Neto HP, da Silva Morelli JG, Brandalize D, et al. Analysis of electromyographic activity in spastic biceps brachii muscle following neural mobilization. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2012;16(3):364-8.

Saxena A, Sehgal S, Jangra MK. Effectiveness of neurodynamic mobilization versus conventional therapy on spasticity reduction and upper limb function in tetraplegic patients. Asian Spine J. 2020;15(4):498.

Villafañe JH, Silva GB, Chiarotto A, Ragusa OL. Botulinum toxin type A combined with neurodynamic mobilization for upper limb spasticity after stroke: a case report. J Chiropr Med. 2012;11(3):186-91.

Yu B, Zhang X, Cheng Y, Liu L, Yan J, Wang J, et al. The effects of the biceps brachii and brachioradialis on elbow flexor muscle strength and spasticity in stroke patients. Neural Plast. 2022;2022(1):1295908.