Analysis of glycemic trends in elderly patients with diabetes mellitus with continuous glucose monitoring

Authors

  • Anandita Gulhane Department of Medicine, Smt. Kashibai Navale Medical College and General Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India
  • Mihir Awasarikar Department of Biochemistry, Smt. Kashibai Navale Medical College and General Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India
  • Saurabh Padole Department of Cardiology, PD Hinduja Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • Jitendra Ingole Department of Medicine, Smt. Kashibai Navale Medical College and General Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20263529

Keywords:

Continuous glucose monitoring, Elderly, Glycemic trends

Abstract

Background: Glycemic control is critical in elderly diabetics, considering their increased vulnerability to hypo- and hyperglycemic events. Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) offers real-time, 24-hour insights into glucose fluctuations by measuring interstitial glucose levels over 14 days. CGM summarizes glycemic variability using metrics such as time above range (TAR), time in range (TIR), and time below range (TBR), enabling better detection of patterns compared to isolated blood glucose measurements. This study aimed to investigate glycemic variability in elderly diabetics using CGM. Also, to evaluate CGM’s relevance in identifying hypo- and hyperglycemia, and provide evidence for the benefits of CGM in diabetes management.

Methods: A six-month observational study at tertiary care hospital in Pune enrolled elderly diabetics on CGM. Data was transmitted by patients periodically. Insulin therapy was remotely titrated in real time as per patient requirement.

Results: The study had a mean age of 70.72 years, with 76% males. Hypoglycemic episodes were reported in 8% of patients, 64.7% of which were asymptomatic and 35.3% symptomatic. In those experiencing early morning hyperglycemia, 48% patients showed Dawn’s and 32% Somogyi’s phenomenon. 76% of patients had fasting hyperglycemia, while 64% had postprandial hyperglycemia. Following remote insulin titration over 14 days, TAR decreased by 7.1% and TIR increased by 8.7%.

Conclusions: CGM provides a comprehensive, dynamic assessment of glycemic patterns in elderly, surpassing traditional glucose monitoring. Study demonstrates that remote titration of insulin and OHAs based on CGM data significantly improves glycemic control while reducing the risk of hypo- and hyperglycemia. Findings underscore the clinical value of CGM in elderly diabetes care, enabling personalized therapeutic decisions and enhancing safety in a population highly susceptible to glucose fluctuations. Integrating CGM into standard management protocols can optimize outcomes and mitigate complications.

References

Tandon N, Anjana RM, Mohan V, Kaur T, Afshin A, Ong K, et al. The increasing burden of diabetes and variations among the states of India: the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990-2016. The Lancet Glob Heal. 2018;6(12):e1352-62.

Joshi SR, Parikh RM. India; the diabetes capital of the world: Now heading towards hypertension. J Associat Phys India. 2007;55(Y):323.

Singh S, Bajorek B. Defining 'elderly' in clinical practice guidelines for pharmacotherapy. Pharm Pract (Granada). 2014;12(4):489.

Abdelhafiz AH, Rodríguez-Mañas L, Morley JE, Sinclair AJ. Hypoglycemia in older people-a less well recognized risk factor for frailty. Aging Dis. 2015;6(2):156-67.

Martín-Timèn I. Mechanisms of hypoglycemia unawareness and implications in diabetic patients. World J Diabetes. 2015;6(7):912-26.

Bergenstal RM, Ahmann AJ, Bailey T, Beck RW, Bissen J, Buckingham B, et al. Recommendations for standardizing glucose reporting and analysis to optimize clinical decision making in diabetes: the ambulatory glucose profile. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013;7(2):562-78.

Adolfsson P, Parkin CG, Thomas A, Krinelke LG. Selecting the Appropriate Continuous Glucose Monitoring System - a Practical Approach. Eur Endocrinol. 2018;14(1):24-9.

Battelino T, Danne T, Bergenstal RM, Amiel SA, Beck R, Biester T, et al. Clinical Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Interpretation: Recommendations From the International Consensus on Time in Range. Diabet Care. 2019;42(8):1593-603.

Abbott Laboratories. Libre 3 user guide Continuous Glucose Monitoring System. Available at: https://freestyleserver.com/Payloads/IFU/2022/q2/ART46090-003_rev-A.pdf. Accessed 30 August 2022.

Abbott Laboratories. Libre 2 User Guide Flash Glucose Monitoring System. Available at: https://freestyleserver.com/Payloads/IFU/2021/q4/ART44417-001_rev-A-WEB.pdf. Accessed 30 August 2022.

Bergenstal RM. Understanding continuous glucose monitoring data. Diabet Technol Therapeut. 2018;20(S2):S-55-S-67.

Battelino T, Danne T, Bergenstal RM, Amiel SA, Beck R, Biester T, et al. Clinical targets for continuous glucose monitoring data interpretation: Recommendations from an International Consensus Statement. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(8):1593-1603.

Danne T, Nimri R, Battelino T, Bergenstal RM, Close KL, DeVries JH, et al. International consensus on use of continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(12):1631-40.

Rodbard D. Interpretation of continuous glucose monitoring data: glycemic variability and quality of glycemic control. Diabet Technol Therapeut. 2009;11(S1):S-55-S-67.

Banerjee J, Dhas Y, Mishra N. Middle-aged Indians with type 2 diabetes are at higher risk of biological ageing with special reference to serum CDKN2A. J Diabetes Res. 2020;2020(1):7569259.

Bellary S, Kyrou I, Brown JE, Bailey CJ. Type 2 diabetes mellitus in older adults: clinical considerations and management. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2021;17(9):534-48.

Ahn J, Yang Y, Park G. Advancing elderly diabetes care: exploring the usability and acceptance of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Geriatric Nurs. 2024;59:15-25.

Kim KJ, Park YS, Sun E, Jo E, Shinn J, Yim HW, et al. A pilot study examining if the additional use of a continuous glucose monitoring is helpful for glucose control in older adults. Yonsei Medi J. 2025;66(6):346-53.

Maiti S, Akhtar S, Upadhyay AK, Mohanty SK. Socioeconomic inequality in awareness, treatment and control of diabetes among adults in India: Evidence from National Family Health Survey of India (NFHS), 2019-2021. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):2971.

Gupta RD, Kothadia RJ, Parray AA. Association between abdominal obesity and diabetes in India: Findings from a nationally representative study. Diabet Epidemiol Manag. 2023;12:100155.

Al-Azayzih A, Kanaan RJ, Altawalbeh SM, Alzoubi KH, Kharaba Z, Jarab A. Prevalence and predictors of hypoglycemia in older outpatients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. PLoS One. 2024;19(8):e0309618.

Samya V, Shriraam V, Jasmine A, Akila GV, Anitha Rani M, Durai V, et al. Prevalence of hypoglycemia among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a rural health center in south India. J Prim Care Commu Heal. 2019;10:2150132719880638.

Miller CD, Phillips LS, Ziemer DC, Gallina DL, Cook CB, El-Kebbi IM. Hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(13):1653-9.

Edridge CL, Dunkley AJ, Bodicoat DH, Rose TC, Gray LJ, Davies MJ, et al. Prevalence and incidence of hypoglycaemia in 532,542 people with type 2 diabetes on oral therapies and insulin: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population based studies. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0126427.

Chandrakumar A, Vikas PV, Tharakan PG, Aravind C. Prevalence of hypoglycemia among diabetic old age home residents in South India. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2016;10(1 Suppl 1):S144-146.

Bao S, Bailey R, Calhoun P, Beck RW. Effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring in older adults with type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2022;24(5):299-306.

Rybicka M, Krysiak R, Okopień B. The dawn phenomenon and the Somogyi effect-two phenomena of morning hyperglycaemia. Endokrynol Pol. 2011;62(3):276-84.

Mozersky RP, Bahl VK, Patel H, Patel N, Palushock S, Yamakawa H, et al. Fasting hyperglycemia in type I diabetes mellitus. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1993;93(7):769-74.

Wu W, Huang Y, Qiu J, Sun J, Wang H. Self-monitoring of blood glucose to assess dawn phenomenon in Chinese people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Int J Endocrinol. 2017;2017(1):7174958.

Carroll MF, Schade DS. The dawn phenomenon revisited: implications for diabetes therapy. Endocr Pract. 2005 ;11(1):55-64.

Sharif-Nia H, Ahmadzadeh Tori N, Behmanesh F, Ghaffari F, Pourreza A. Development and psychometric evaluation of the questionnaire on the contributing factors of tendency towards voluntary single-childedness and childlessness: a mixed method study. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):1305.

Ruan Y, Mercuri L, Papadimitriou D, Galdikas A, Roadknight G, Davies J, et al. Increase in hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia in people with diabetes admitted to hospital during COVID-19 pandemic. J Diabet Complicat. 2023;37(7):108474.

Amutha A, Ranjit U, Anjana RM, Shanthi R CS, Rajalakshmi R, Venkatesan U, et al. Clinical profile and incidence of microvascular complications of childhood and adolescent onset type 1 and type 2 diabetes seen at a tertiary diabetes center in India. Pediatr Diabet. 2021;22(1):67-74.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-29

How to Cite

Gulhane, A., Awasarikar, M., Padole, S., & Ingole, J. (2026). Analysis of glycemic trends in elderly patients with diabetes mellitus with continuous glucose monitoring. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 14(10), 4601–4607. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20263529

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles