Monitoring, reporting and causality assessment of adverse drug reactions among admitted adult patients at a tertiary care teaching hospital: a prospective observational study

Authors

  • Abhishek Wadiyar Department of Pharmacy Practice, Hanagal Shri Kumareshwar College of Pharmacy, Bagalkote, Karnataka, India
  • Gopal Choudhari Department of Pharmacy Practice, Hanagal Shri Kumareshwar College of Pharmacy, Bagalkote, Karnataka, India
  • Pallavi Potadar Department of Pharmacy Practice, Hanagal Shri Kumareshwar College of Pharmacy, Bagalkote, Karnataka, India
  • Praveen Badiger Department of Pharmacy Practice, Hanagal Shri Kumareshwar College of Pharmacy, Bagalkote, Karnataka, India
  • Vivekanand Menasinakai Department of Pharmacy Practice, Hanagal Shri Kumareshwar College of Pharmacy, Bagalkote, Karnataka, India
  • M. G. Keshannavar Department of Pharmacy Practice, Hanagal Shri Kumareshwar College of Pharmacy, Bagalkote, Karnataka, India https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0202-3844
  • Raghavendra S. Hegde Department of Pharmacy Practice, Hanagal Shri Kumareshwar College of Pharmacy, Bagalkote, Karnataka, India https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7523-6333

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20264171

Keywords:

Adverse drug reaction, Causality assessment, Hospitalised patients, Pharmacovigilance, Preventability, Spontaneous reporting

Abstract

Background: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) add avoidably to illness, lengthen hospital stays and cost lives, yet they go under-reported in many wards. We set out to capture and report ADRs in admitted adult patients and to characterise their pattern, causality, severity, preventability and management at a tertiary care teaching hospital.

Methods: Over six months (21 March 2023 to 21 September 2023) we ran a prospective, cross-sectional, observational study based on spontaneous reporting among patients older than 18 years admitted to General Medicine, Surgery, Dermatology and Psychiatry. Suspected reactions were weighed for causality with the World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Centre and Naranjo scales, for severity with the Hartwig and Siegel scale, and for preventability with the Schumock and Thornton criteria. Data were summarised with descriptive statistics and the chi-square test.

Results: Fifty-four ADRs arose in 38 patients across 5192 admissions, an incidence of 1.04 per 100 admissions. Reactions clustered in the 46–60-year age group and were more common in males (35.08%). Predictable type A reactions dominated (88.89%). The endocrine system was affected most often (22.22%), and hypoglycaemia was the single commonest event. Antidiabetics (19.29%) and antibiotics (12.28%) were the drug classes implicated most frequently. On Naranjo assessment the majority were probable (83.33%), and 94.44% were of moderate severity. Stopping the suspected drug (70.37%) was the mainstay of management, and 83.33% of patients improved.

Conclusions: The reactions seen here were largely predictable, moderate and preventable, driven chiefly by polypharmacy and coexisting illness. Disciplined spontaneous reporting and prescriber education are key to safer medicine use.

References

World Health Organization. Safety of medicines: a guide to detecting and reporting adverse drug reactions: why health professionals need to take action. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-EDM-QSM-2002-2 Accessed on 22 July 2026.

Giardina C, Cutroneo PM, Mocciaro E, Russo GT, Mandraffino G, Basile G, et al. Adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: results of the FORWARD (Facilitation of Reporting in Hospital Ward) study. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:350.

Sun J, Deng X, Chen X, Huang J, Huang S, Li Y, et al. Incidence of adverse drug reactions in COVID-19 patients in China: an active monitoring study by hospital pharmacovigilance system. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020;108(4):791-7.

Ramesh M, Pandit J, Parthasarathi G. Adverse drug reactions in a South Indian hospital—their severity and cost involved. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2003;12:687-92.

Parle A, Singh SP, Kumar V. Status of adverse drug reaction reporting by health care professionals of Delhi. Indian J Pharm Pract. 2012;5(4):42-50.

Naranjo CA, Busto U, Sellers EM, Sandor P, Ruiz I, Roberts EA, et al. A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1981;30(2):239-45.

Hartwig SC, Siegel J, Schneider PJ. Preventability and severity assessment in reporting adverse drug reactions. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1992;49(9):2229-32.

Schumock GT, Thornton JP. Focusing on the preventability of adverse drug reactions. Hosp Pharm. 1992;27(6):538.

Sriram S, Ghasemi A, Ramasamy R, Devi M, Balasubramanian R, Ravi TK, et al. Prevalence of adverse drug reactions at a private tertiary care hospital in south India. J Res Med Sci. 2011;16(1):16-25.

Chandrashekhar VM, Harikrishna A, Kumar P, Hemanthkumar N, Chandrakanth M. Adverse drug reaction monitoring and reporting at H.S.K Hospital and Research Center-Bagalkot. Indian J Pharm Pract. 2016;9(1):49-56.

Dilip C, Lisa MM, Saraswathi R, Divya R. Adverse drug reaction monitoring in a tertiary level referral hospital, Kerala. Indian J Pharm Pract. 2012;5(2):28-32.

Inamdar SZ, Pradeepthi K, Ashwini N, Soumyashree L, Kulkarni RV. Pharmacist mediated assessment and reporting of adverse drug reactions in a tertiary care hospital. Indian J Pharm Pract. 2018;11(3):126-9.

Palanisamy S, Arul Kumaran KSG, Rajasekaran A. A prospective study on adverse drug reactions in a tertiary care South Indian hospital. Indian J Pharm Pract. 2013;6(2):49-60.

Edwards IR, Aronson JK. Adverse drug reactions: definitions, diagnosis, and management. Lancet. 2000;356(9237):1255-9.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-31

How to Cite

Wadiyar, A., Choudhari, G., Potadar, P., Badiger, P., Menasinakai, V., Keshannavar, M. G., & Hegde, R. S. (2026). Monitoring, reporting and causality assessment of adverse drug reactions among admitted adult patients at a tertiary care teaching hospital: a prospective observational study. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 14(11), 5148–5154. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20264171

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles