Clinical readiness and generalizability of artificial intelligence in implant dentistry: a systematic review of diagnostic accuracy, treatment planning, prognosis and external validation

Authors

  • Rohit Raghavan Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Royal Dental College, Chalissery, Kerala, India
  • Shajahan P. A. Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Royal Dental College, Chalissery, Kerala, India
  • Akash R. Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Royal Dental College, Chalissery, Kerala, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20263120

Keywords:

Machine learning, Deep learning, Dental implants, Implant dentistry, CBCT, Implant planning, Implant prognosis, Peri-implantitis, Digital dentistry, AI

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being incorporated into digital dentistry. In implant dentistry, machine-learning and deep-learning systems have been investigated for radiographic diagnosis, anatomical segmentation, treatment planning, prosthetically driven implant positioning, and prediction of implant-related outcomes. To systematically evaluate the clinical applications of AI in implant dentistry, with particular emphasis on diagnostic accuracy, treatment planning, prognosis, external validation, generalizability, and clinical applicability. A systematic review will be conducted according to PRISMA 2020. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library will be searched from inception to the final search date. Studies evaluating AI, machine learning, deep learning, neural networks, or related computational approaches in human implant dentistry will be considered. Diagnostic studies will be assessed using QUADAS-2, prognostic studies using QUAPAS where applicable, and prediction-model studies using PROBAST+AI. Reporting quality of prediction models will be assessed using TRIPOD+AI. Current evidence demonstrates promising AI performance in anatomical segmentation, CBCT analysis, implant treatment planning, prosthetically driven positioning, and prediction of implant-related outcomes. However, the literature is heterogeneous with respect to datasets, algorithms, reference standards, outcome definitions, validation procedures, and performance measures. Many studies remain retrospective, and external validation and evidence of clinical utility are comparatively limited. AI has considerable potential as a decision-support technology in implant dentistry. The principal research priority is now progression from technical accuracy toward externally validated, explainable, calibrated, clinically useful, and patient-centered AI systems. Keywords AI; machine learning; deep learning; dental implants; implant dentistry; CBCT; implant planning; implant prognosis; peri-implantitis; digital dentistry.

References

Mangano F, Gandolfi A, Luongo G, Logozzo S. Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature. BMC Oral Health. 2017;17(1):149.

Mangano C, Luongo F, Migliario M, Mortellaro C, Mangano FG. Combining intraoral scans, cone beam computed tomography and face scans: the virtual patient. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29(8):2241-6.

Schwendicke F, Samek W, Krois J. Artificial intelligence in dentistry: chances and challenges. J Dent Res. 2020;99(7):769-74.

Khanagar SB, Al-Ehaideb A, Maganur PC, Vishwanathaiah S, Patil S, Naik S, et al. Developments, application, and performance of artificial intelligence in dentistry: a systematic review. J Dent Sci. 2021;16(1):508-22.

Alqutaibi AY, Algabri R, Ibrahim WI, Alhajj MN, Elawady D. Dental implant planning using artificial intelligence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2025;134(5):1619-29.

Alqutaibi AY, Algabri RS, Alamri AS, Alhazmi L, Almadani SM, Alturkistani AM, et al. Advancements of artificial intelligence algorithms in predicting dental implant prognosis from radiographic images: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2025;134(6):2177-88.

Zaww K, Abbas H, Vanegas Sáenz JR, Hong G. AI-driven innovations for dental implant treatment planning: a systematic review. J Prosthodont Res. 2026;70(2):192-205.

Zaman G, Khan RS, Spacey A, Ucer C, Wright S. The use of artificial intelligence in planning dental implant procedures: a systematic review. Dent J (Basel). 2026;14(5):248.

Sokoli D, Kiseri B, Demjaha G, Asllani-Hoxha F, Bimbashi V. What is the impact of AI-driven prosthodontic planning on dental implant positioning outcomes? A systematic review. J Prosthodont. 2026;38(6):77.

Wu Z, Yu X, Wang F, Xu C. Application of artificial intelligence in dental implant prognosis: a scoping review. J Dent. 2024;144:104924.

Rekawek P, Herbst EA, Suri A, Ford BP, Rajapakse CS, Panchal N. Machine learning and artificial intelligence: a web-based implant failure and peri-implantitis prediction model for clinicians. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2023;38(3):576-82.

Mameno T, Wada M, Nozaki K, Takahashi T, Tsujioka Y, Akema S, et al. Predictive modeling for peri-implantitis by using machine learning techniques. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):11090.

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.

Whiting PF, Rutjes AWS, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(8):529-36.

Moons KGM, Damen JAA, Kaul T, Hooft L, Andaur Navarro C, Dhiman P, et al. PROBAST+AI: an updated quality, risk of bias, and applicability assessment tool for prediction models using regression or artificial intelligence methods. BMJ. 2025;388:e082505.

Collins GS, Moons KGM, Dhiman P, Riley RD, Beam AL, Van Calster B, et al. TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods. BMJ. 2024;385:e078378.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-29

How to Cite

Raghavan, R., A., S. P., & R., A. (2026). Clinical readiness and generalizability of artificial intelligence in implant dentistry: a systematic review of diagnostic accuracy, treatment planning, prognosis and external validation. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 14(9), 4010–4019. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20263120

Issue

Section

Systematic Reviews