Molecular detection of Helicobacter pylori in rapid urease test-negative gastric biopsy samples

Swarna Paul; Muhammad Moazzem Hossain; Afreen Sultana; Banani Barua; Afroza Sultana; Masuma Nasrin; Sifat Saima; Rahella Begum; Abdul Quddus; Maraz Hossain Chayan

doi:10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20264158

Authors

Swarna Paul Department of Microbiology, Chittagong Medical College, Chattogram, Bangladesh
Muhammad Moazzem Hossain Department of Virology, Chittagong Medical College, Chattogram, Bangladesh
Afreen Sultana Department of Microbiology, Chittagong Medical College, Chattogram, Bangladesh
Banani Barua Department of Biochemistry, Chittagong Medical College, Chattogram, Bangladesh
Afroza Sultana Alif Hospital and Diagnostic Center, Chattogram, Bangladesh
Masuma Nasrin Department of Neurology, Chittagong Medical College Hospital, Chattogram, Bangladesh
Sifat Saima Department of Dermatology, Chittagong Medical College Hospital, Chattogram, Bangladesh
Rahella Begum Department of Surgery, Chittagong Medical College Hospital, Chattogram, Bangladesh
Abdul Quddus Department of ENT and Head-Neck Surgery, Parshuram Upazila Health Complex, Feni, Bangladesh
Maraz Hossain Chayan Department of Endocrinology, Chittagong Medical College Hospital, Chattogram, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20264158

Keywords:

Helicobacter pylori, Nested PCR, Urea gene, Rapid urease test, Gastric biopsy

Abstract

Background: Accurate detection of Helicobacter pylori remains challenging in dyspeptic patients because urease-based assays may be negative in low-density or patchy infection. The study aims to evaluate biopsy-based nested PCR targeting the ureA gene for detection of H. pylori, with emphasis on molecular detection among rapid urease test (RUT)-negative gastric biopsies.

Methods: This cross-sectional descriptive study enrolled 130 dyspeptic adults undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy at the Department of Microbiology, Chittagong Medical College, Chattogram, in collaboration with the Department of Gastroenterology, Chittagong Medical College Hospital, over a one-year period from January 2023 to December 2023. Two antral biopsies were collected per patient, one for RUT and one for Nested PCR targeting ureA.

Results: The cohort included 76 males (58.46%) and 54 females (41.54%), with the largest age stratum 20-40 years. Endoscopy was normal in 52 (40.0%) and abnormal in 78 (60.0%), most commonly antral gastritis (31.5%). Nested PCR was positive in 97/130 (74.6%), RUT was positive in 87/130 (66.9%). Among RUT-negative cases (n=43), nested PCR detected H. pylori DNA in 12 (27.9%); among RUT-positive cases (n=87), PCR was positive in 85 (97.7%). RUT and PCR were strongly associated (χ²=74.18, p<0.0001). Using RUT as comparator, PCR Sensitivity was 97.70%, Specificity 72.09%, positive predictive value (PPV) 87.63%, negative predictive value (NPV) 93.94%, accuracy 89.23%.

Conclusions: Nested ureA PCR demonstrated high detection and identification even with infections among RUT-negative biopsies, supporting its adjunct value in tertiary-care workflows.

References

Miftahussurur M, Yamaoka Y. Diagnostic Methods of Helicobacter pylori Infection for Epidemiological Studies: Critical Importance of Indirect Test Validation. BioMed Res Int. 2016;2016(1):4819423.

Costa LCMC, das Graças Carvalho M, La Guárdia Custódio Pereira AC, Teixeira Neto RG, Andrade Figueiredo LC, Barros-Pinheiro M. Diagnostic Methods for Helicobacter pylori. Med Princ Pract. 2024;33(3):173-84.

Bogiel T, Mikucka A, Szaflarska-Popławska A, Grzanka D. Usefulness of Molecular Methods for Helicobacter pylori Detection in Pediatric Patients and Their Correlation with Histopathological Sydney Classification. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(1):179.

Fernandez-Caso B, Miqueleiz A, Valdez VB, Alarcón T. Are molecular methods helpful for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection and for the prediction of its antimicrobial resistance? Front Microbiol. 2022;13:962063.

Bai W, Xia P. 'Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection and recent advances', Diagnostics, 2021;11(8):1305.

Liu H, Rahman A, Semino-Mora C, Doi SQ, Dubois A. Specific and Sensitive Detection of H. pylori in Biological Specimens by Real-Time RT-PCR and In Situ Hybridization. PLOS one. 2008;3(7):e2689.

Elnosh M, Altayb H, Hamedelnil Y, Elshareef W, Abugrain A, Osman E, et al. Comparison of invasive histological and molecular methods in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori from gastric biopsies of Sudanese patients: a cross-sectional study. F1000Research. 2022;11:123.

Abdulrahman AT, Ismail Shna I, Hussain SS, Ahmed NJ, Hassan AN. Detection of Helicobacter pylori’s Virulence Gene (UreA) and its Influence on the Result of Rapid Urease Test (RUT). Al-Mustansiriyah J Sci. 2022;33(4):42-8.

Aftab H, Yamaoka Y, Ahmed F, Khan AA, Subsomwong P, Miftahussurur M, et al. Validation of diagnostic tests and epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori infection in Bangladesh. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2018;12(5):305-12.

Szymczak A, Ferenc S, Majewska J, Miernikiewicz P, Gnus J, Witkiewicz W, et al. Application of 16S rRNA gene sequencing in Helicobacter pylori detection. PeerJ, 2020;8:e9099.

Patel SK, Pratap CB, Jain AK, Gulati AK, Nath G. Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori: What should be the gold standard? World J Gastroenterol WJG. 2014;20(36):12847-59.

Vinette KM, Gibney KM, Proujansky R, Fawcett PT. Comparison of PCR and clinical laboratory tests for diagnosing H. pylori infection in pediatric patients. BMC Microbiol. 2004;4:5.

Kismat S, Tanni NN, Akhtar R, Roy CK, Rahman MM, Molla MdMA, et al. Diagnosis and Comparison of Three Invasive Detection Methods for Helicobacter pylori Infection. Microbiol Insights. 2022;15:11786361221133947.