From static to dynamic prosthodontics: digital recording of mandibular function for personalized prosthetic rehabilitation

Authors

  • Rohit Raghavan Department of Prosthodontics, Royal Dental College, Palakkad, Kerala, India
  • Shajahan P. A. Department of Prosthodontics, Royal Dental College, Palakkad, Kerala, India
  • Shaman Shalu S. B. Department of Prosthodontics, Royal Dental College, Palakkad, Kerala, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20263150

Keywords:

Digital prosthodontics, Mandibular movement, Jaw tracking, Virtual articulator, Dynamic virtual patient, Personalized prosthodontics

Abstract

Conventional prosthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning rely extensively on static records such as diagnostic casts, maxillomandibular relationship records, facebow transfers, interocclusal records, and mechanical articulators. Although these methods remain clinically valuable, they provide only a limited representation of the continuously changing relationship between the maxilla, mandible, temporomandibular joints, dentition, and neuromuscular system. Advances in digital dentistry have enabled the acquisition of three-dimensional anatomical information together with patient-specific mandibular movement. Intraoral scanning, facial scanning, cone-beam computed tomography, digital maxillomandibular registration, optical jaw tracking, computerized occlusal analysis, and virtual articulation can now be combined to develop increasingly comprehensive digital representations of the prosthodontic patient. Incorporating movement into a three-dimensional virtual patient introduces a fourth dimension-time-and provides an opportunity to evaluate prosthetic designs under dynamic rather than purely static conditions. This transition may be particularly relevant to complete dentures, implant-supported prostheses, and extensive restorative rehabilitation. However, differences among acquisition systems, registration errors, limited standardization, equipment costs, and insufficient long-term clinical evidence currently restrict widespread implementation. This narrative review discusses the evolution from static to dynamic prosthodontic records, contemporary technologies for recording mandibular function, their integration with virtual articulation, and their potential contribution to personalized prosthetic rehabilitation. Emerging concepts including four-dimensional virtual patients, artificial intelligence-assisted movement analysis, and functional digital twins are also considered.

References

Lepidi L, Galli M, Mastrangelo F, Venezia P, Joda T, Wang HL, et al. Virtual articulators and virtual mounting procedures: where do we stand? J Prosthodont. 2021;30(1):24-35.

Zambrana N, Sesma N, Fomenko I, Dakir EI, Pieralli S. Jaw tracking integration to the virtual patient: a 4D dynamic approach. J Prosth Dent. 2024;131(3):370-4.

Lepidi L, Kim BC, Giberti L, Suriano C, Li J, Grande F. The 4D virtual patient: a proof of concept in digital dentistry. J Prosthet Dent. 2025;134(5):1442-5.

Revilla-León M, Zeitler JM, Kois JC. Digital maxillomandibular relationship and mandibular motion recording by using an optical jaw tracking system to acquire a dynamic virtual patient. J Prosthet Dent. 2024;132(1):14-9.

Grande F, Lepidi L, Tesini F, Acquadro A, Valenti C, Pagano S, et al. Investigation of the precision of a novel jaw tracking system in recording mandibular movements: a preliminary clinical study. J Dent. 2024;146:105047.

Gu X, Hu T, Zhang Z, He F, Shi J, Yang H. Comparison of the accuracy of an ultrasonic-based jaw tracking device with conventional electronic tracking device. J Adv Prosthodont. 2025;17(1):47-58.

Tafuri G, Santilli M, D'Addazio G, Murmura G, Traini T, Femminella B, et al. Jaw tracking system in digital dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont. 2026;6:1-21.

Li W, Chen H, Wang Y, Xie Q, Sun Y. Digital determination and recording of edentulous maxillomandibular relationship using a jaw movement tracking system. J Prosthodont. 2022;31(8):663-72.

Doshi KN, Sathe S, Dubey SA, Bhoyar A, Dhamande M, Jaiswal T. A comprehensive review on virtual articulators. Cureus. 2024;16:e52554.

Jain M, Abduo J. Accuracy of static and dynamic occlusion simulation of virtual articulation compared with a conventional articulator: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2026;136(1):e63-e69.

Chowdhary R, Sonnahalli NK. Clinical applications of the T-Scan quantitative digital occlusal analysis technology: a systematic review. Int J Comput Dent. 2024;27(1):49-86.

Aradya A, Koodalakuppe Nagarajagowda RS, Basavaraju RM, Srinivas S, Kumararama SS. Influence of T-Scan system on occlusion correction of implant supported prostheses: a systematic review. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2022;23(1):105-17.

Wang J, Jin C, Dong B, Yue L, Gao S. Fully digital workflow for replicating treatment dentures: a technique for jaw relation transfer and dynamic occlusal adjustment. J Prosthet Dent. 2023;130(3):288-94.

Galván-Lobo G, Cruz-Vida M, Hartrick NE, Galván-Guerrero G. Fabrication of facially guided computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing complete dentures incorporating dynamic occlusion management with mandibular trackers: a dental technique. J Prosthet Dent. 2026;135(6):e16-e20.

Park CY, Lee Y, Hong SJ, Paek J, Noh K, Pae A, et al. Full-mouth rehabilitation of severely attrited dentition with missing posterior teeth: a case report using digital workflow with jaw motion tracking. J Korean Acad Prosthodont. 2023;61(4):293-307.

Jeong SK, Koak JY, Heo SJ, Kim SK, Park JM. Complete mouth rehabilitation, using jaw motion tracking and double scan technique in a patient with osteoarthrosis: a case report. J Korean Acad Prosthodont. 2024;62(1):82-94.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-29

How to Cite

Raghavan, R., P. A., S., & S. B., S. S. (2026). From static to dynamic prosthodontics: digital recording of mandibular function for personalized prosthetic rehabilitation. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 14(9), 4210–4217. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20263150

Issue

Section

Review Articles