Skin staples versus skin sutures for skin closure in elective and emergency abdominal surgeries: a prospective comparative study

Pavan Kumar Adivishnu; Rajashekara Babu Gangappa; Sunil Kumar Kola

doi:10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20264174

Authors

Pavan Kumar Adivishnu Department of General Surgery, GEMS, Ragolu, Andhra Pradesh, India
Rajashekara Babu Gangappa Department of General Surgery, GEMS, Ragolu, Andhra Pradesh, India
Sunil Kumar Kola Department of General Surgery, GEMS, Ragolu, Andhra Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20264174

Keywords:

Cosmetic outcome, Abdominal surgery, Skin staples, Skin sutures, Surgical site infection, Wound closure

Abstract

Background: Skin closure influences operative time, postoperative pain, wound healing, surgical site infection (SSI) and cosmetic outcome. This study compared skin staples with conventional skin sutures in elective and emergency abdominal surgeries.

Methods: In this prospective comparative study, 97 adults undergoing abdominal surgery were enrolled: 49 received metallic skin staples and 48 received conventional non-absorbable interrupted skin sutures. The primary outcome was skin closure time. Secondary outcomes were Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, SSI, wound dehiscence, Vancouver Scar Scale score at three months and time to removal of closure material.

Results: Skin closure time was shorter with staples than sutures (3.2±0.8 vs. 9.6±1.9 minutes; p<0.001). Pain scores were lower with staples at 24 hours, postoperative day 3 and postoperative day 7. SSI occurred in 12.2% versus 20.8% and wound dehiscence in 4.1% versus 10.4%, in the staple and suture groups, respectively. Cosmetic scores were higher with staples (8.6±1.1 vs. 7.8±1.3; p=0.01) and removal occurred earlier (8.1±1.2 vs. 9.4±1.5 days; p=0.004).

Conclusions: Metallic skin staples reduced closure time and postoperative pain and produced better cosmetic outcomes without increasing wound-related complications. They are a safe and efficient alternative to conventional skin sutures for abdominal wound closure.

References

World Health Organization. Global guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infection. World Health Organization. 2016.

Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR: Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection. 1999, 1999:250-78.

Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG: CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections. 1992;2:606-8.

Mackeen AD, Berghella V, Larsen ML: Techniques and materials for skin closure in cesarean section . Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 201211, 003577-10.

Pillai CKS, Sharma CP: Review paper: absorbable polymeric surgical sutures. J Biomater Appl. 2010;5:291-366.

Meiring L, Cilliers K, Barry R, Nel CJ. A comparison of a disposable skin stapler and nylon sutures for wound closure. S Afr Med J. 1982;62(11): 371-2.

Owens CD, Stoessel K: Surgical site infections: epidemiology, microbiology and prevention. J Hosp Infect. 2008;2:3-10.

Anderson DJ, Podgorny K, Berríos-Torres SI. Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute care hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014;35:605-27.

Berríos-Torres SI, Umscheid CA, Bratzler DW. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection. 2017;152:784-91.

Dumville JC, Gray TA, Walter CJ. Dressings for the prevention of surgical site infection . Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;3091:10.

Leaper DJ, van Goor H, Reilly J. Surgical site infection - a European perspective of incidence and economic burden. Int Wound J. 2004;3:247-73.

O'Connell PR, McCaskie AW, Sayers RD, editors. Bailey & Love's short practice of surgery. 2023.

Kaleem A, Ab Hamid Wani GS, Rayoo S, Parihar S. Comparison of fenyo lindberg scoring system with modified alvarado scoring system for diagnosis of acute appendicitis. IP J Surg Allied Sci. 2025;7(4):128-33.

Grady ZJ, Gallo LK, Lin HK, Magod BL, Coulthard SL, Flink BJ, Knauer EM, Winer JH, Papandria D, Pettitt BJ. From the operating room to online: medical student surgery education in the time of COVID-19. J Surg Res. 2022;270:145-50.

Sullivan T, Smith J, Kermode J, McIver E, Courtemanche DJ: Rating the burn scar. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1990,11:256-60.