Drug-eluting balloon angioplasty: redefining percutaneous coronary intervention

Authors

  • Bhargavi Rasamsetti Department of Cardiology, Dr. Pinnamaneni Siddhartha Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Foundation, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • Keerthibala Velagapudi Dr. Pinnamaneni Siddhartha Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Foundation, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • Vamsi Krishna Talasila Department of Cardiology, Dr. Pinnamaneni Siddhartha Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Foundation, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20263260

Keywords:

Drug-eluting balloon, Sirolimus, Percutaneous coronary intervention, Restenosis, Angioplasty

Abstract

Background: Drug-eluting balloon (DEB) angioplasty has emerged as an effective alternative to stent-based coronary revascularization, offering comparable efficacy without the long-term complications associated with permanent metallic implants. Sirolimus-based drug-coated balloon platforms offer distinct mechanistic advantages through inhibition of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway, enabling selective suppression of smooth muscle cell proliferation while preserving endothelial integrity. Herein, we report the clinical outcomes of a prospective cohort of 59 patients treated with sirolimus-DEB angioplasty.

Methods: We prospectively enrolled 59 consecutive patients undergoing sirolimus-Drug eluting balloon angioplasty for coronary artery disease at a single center over a two-year period (2023-2025). Primary endpoints were technical and procedural success. Secondary endpoints included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), restenosis, and target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 6-12 months of follow-up.

Results: The mean age of the cohort was 59.1±10.7 years; 40 (67.8%) were male and 19 (32.2%) were female, with male predominance. Clinical presentations included acute coronary syndromes in 29 (49.2%) and chronic coronary disease in 30 (50.8%). Sirolimus DEB was deployed in 56 of 59 cases (94.9%). Technical and procedural success was achieved in 59 of 59 cases (100%), with all procedures achieving Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 3 flow and residual stenosis <30%. In-hospital MACE occurred in 1 of 59 patients (1.7%), attributable to refractory cardiogenic shock in the setting of anterior myocardial infarction with severe left ventricular dysfunction; no procedure-related mortality or major bleeding was recorded. At 6-12-month follow-up, available in 56 of 59 patients (94.9%), 53 of 56 (94.6%) were symptom-free with zero TLR and zero late MACE.

Conclusion: Sirolimus-eluting balloon angioplasty demonstrates excellent safety and efficacy in this single-center prospective cohort. The 59/59 (100%) technical success rate, 58/59 (98.3%) uneventful procedural course, and 1/59 (1.7%) MACE rate compare favorably with published benchmarks and support the continued adoption of sirolimus-based drug-coated balloon technology for percutaneous coronary revascularization in appropriately selected patients.

References

Buccheri D, Piraino D, Andolina G, Cortese B. Understanding and managing in-stent restenosis: a review of clinical data, from pathogenesis to treatment. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8(10):E1150-62.

Colombo A, Giannini F, Briguori C. Should we still have bare-metal stents available in our catheterization laboratory? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(5):607-19.

Chioncel V, Gherasie F, Iancu A, Avram AG. Coronary angioplasty with drug-coated balloons: pharmacological foundations, clinical efficacy, and future directions. Medicina (Kaunas). 2025;61(8):1470.

Zhang Z, Yu G, Guo R. Paclitaxel- and sirolimus-coated drug-coated balloons versus drug-eluting stents in acute myocardial infarction: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. Iran J Pharm Res. 2025;24:e164739.

Shaikh S, Hamza M, Upreti P, Akkawi M, Rajak K, Haider MZ, et al. Meta-analysis comparing drug-coated balloon versus plain old balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis of coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol. 2024;229:22-7.

Cutlip DE, Mehran R, Sharma S, Doros G, Jefferson B, Stefanini G, et al. Sirolimus-eluting balloon vs repeat drug-eluting stent or balloon angioplasty for coronary in-stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2026;88:62-72.

von Koch S, Zhou M, Rosén HC, Zwackman S, Jurga J, Grimfjärd P, et al. Drug-coated balloons versus drug-eluting stents or plain old balloon angioplasty: a long-term in-stent restenosis study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2024;13:e036839.

Ono M, Asano T, Noguchi M, Kogame N, Iijima R, Osakada K, et al. Cutting balloon versus standard balloon for lesion preparation of drug-coated balloon treatment in de-novo coronary artery lesions: rationale and design of the randomized NATURE trial. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2025;81:48-56.

Rissanen TT, Uskela S, Eränen J, Mäntylä P, Olli A, Romppanen H, et al. Drug-coated balloon for treatment of de-novo coronary artery lesions in patients with high bleeding risk (DEBUT): a single-blind, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2019;394:230-9.

Yeh RW, Shlofmitz R, Moses J, Bachinsky W, Dohad S, Rudick S, et al. Paclitaxel-coated balloon vs uncoated balloon for coronary in-stent restenosis: the AGENT IDE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2024;331:1015-24.

Giacoppo D, Alfonso F, Xu B, Claessen BEPM, Adriaenssens T, Jensen C, et al. Drug-coated balloon angioplasty versus drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with coronary stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75:2664-78.

Alfonso F, Pérez-Vizcayno MJ, García Del Blanco B, Otaegui I, Masotti M, Zueco J, et al. Long-term results of everolimus-eluting stents versus drug-eluting balloons in patients with bare-metal in-stent restenosis: 3-year follow-up of the RIBS V clinical trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:1246-55.

Jensen CJ, Richardt G, Tölg R, Erglis A, Skurk C, Jung W, et al. Angiographic and clinical performance of a paclitaxel-coated balloon compared to a second-generation sirolimus-eluting stent in patients with in-stent restenosis: the BIOLUX randomised controlled trial. EuroIntervention. 2018;14:1096-103.

Abdelaziz A, Atta K, Hafez AH, Elsayed H, Ibrahim AA, et al. Drug-coated balloons versus drug-eluting stents in patients with in-stent restenosis: an updated meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024;19:624.

Bhogal S, Hill AP, Merdler I, Wermers JP, Ben-Dor I, Waksman R. Drug-coated balloons for coronary artery disease: an updated review with future perspectives. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2024;69:79-89.

Vrints C, Andreotti F, Koskinas KC, Rossello X, Adamo M, Ainslie J, et al. 2024 ESC guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2024;45:3415-537.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-05

How to Cite

Rasamsetti, B., Velagapudi, K., & Talasila, V. K. (2026). Drug-eluting balloon angioplasty: redefining percutaneous coronary intervention. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20263260

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles