Effect of menstrual phase-wise training versus conventional training on speed, agility, power and psychological well-being in female sprinters: a comparative study

Ishita Dale; Neeraj Singh; Usha  Singh; Priyanshu Josh

doi:10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20263544

Authors

Ishita Dale Sports Science Centre, MP State Sports Academy, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8161-0506
Neeraj Singh Department of Physiotherapy, Mahatma Gandhi Memorial Allied Health Science Institute (MAHSI), Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7197-6877
Usha Singh Department of Physiotherapy, Mahatma Gandhi Memorial Allied Health Science Institute (MAHSI), Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1906-4054
Priyanshu Josh Department of Physiotherapy, Mahatma Gandhi Memorial Allied Health Science Institute (MAHSI), Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9374-9965

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20263544

Keywords:

Female athletes, Menstrual cycle, Phase-based training, Power, Psychological well-being, Sprint performance

Abstract

Background: The menstrual cycle phase is increasingly acknowledged as a determinant of female athletic performance; nevertheless, data for phase-tailored training of sprint-specific attributes is still scarce. This study examined the effects of a menstrual phase-wise training (MPWT) program versus conventional training (CT) on speed, agility, power, and psychological well-being in female sprinters.

Methods: This comparative research randomly assigned 60 female sprinters (18-28 years) either MPWT (n=30) or CT (n=30) for six weeks. MPWT suggested phase-specific exercise-rest and breathing exercises during menstruation, strengthening during the follicular phase, resistance range-of-motion exercise during ovulation, and endurance running during the luteal phase; CT maintained normal sport-specific training. Measurements speed (30 m sprint test), agility (Edgren side-step test), power (vertical leap, jump height, Harman average and peak power) and psychological well-being (BBC subjective well-being scale) were examined pre- and post-intervention.

Results: Groups were similar at baseline. After the intervention, MPWT provided considerably bigger gains than CT for lower-limb power (vertical jump/jump height, p=0.009; Harman average power, p=0.001; Harman peak power, p=0.001) with medium to large effect sizes. There were no significant differences between groups in speed or agility. There was a substantial drop in psychological well-being within the MPWT group (p=0.0001) and no significant difference was seen across groups (p=0.05).

Conclusions: A six week menstrual phase-wise training program provided a selective benefit of power-specificity against conventional training in female sprinters. There were no improvements in speed or agility and an unsolved deficit in psychological well-being. Larger trials are needed before menstrual cycle-informed training may be suggested for everyday practice.

References

Reed BG, Carr BR. The normal menstrual cycle and the control of ovulation. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Blackman MR, eds. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000.

Meignié A, Duclos M, Carling C, Orhant E, Provost P, Toussaint JF, et al. The effects of menstrual cycle phase on elite athlete performance: a critical and systematic review. Front Physiol. 2021;12:654585.

Carmichael MA, Thomson RL, Moran LJ, Wycherley TP. The impact of menstrual cycle phase on athletes’ performance: a narrative review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(4):1667.

Niering M, Wolf-Belala N, Seifert J, Tovar O, Coldewey J, Kuranda J, et al. The influence of menstrual cycle phases on maximal strength performance in healthy female adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Sports. 2024;12(1):31.

Oosthuyse T, Bosch AN. The effect of the menstrual cycle on exercise metabolism: implications for exercise performance in eumenorrhoeic women. Sports Med. 2010;40(3):207-27.

Sung E, Han A, Hinrichs T, Vorgerd M, Manchado C, Platen P. Effects of follicular versus luteal phase-based strength training in young women. Springerplus. 2014;3:668.

Mihm M, Gangooly S, Muttukrishna S. The normal menstrual cycle in women. Anim Reprod Sci. 2011;124(3-4):229-36.

Hohmann E, Bryant AL, Livingstone E, Reaburn P, Tetsworth K, Imhoff A. Tibial acceleration profiles during the menstrual cycle in female athletes. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015;135(10):1419-27.

Lefevre N, Bohu Y, Klouche S, Lecocq J, Herman S. Anterior cruciate ligament tear during the menstrual cycle in female recreational skiers. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013;99(5):571-5.

Julian R, Hecksteden A, Fullagar HHK, Meyer T. The effects of menstrual cycle phase on physical performance in female soccer players. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0173951.

Janse de Jonge XAK, Thompson MW, Chuter VH, Silk LN, Thom JM. Exercise performance over the menstrual cycle in temperate and hot, humid conditions. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(11):2190-8.

Findlay RJ, Macrae EHR, Whyte IY, Easton C, Forrest LJ. How the menstrual cycle and menstruation affect sporting performance: experiences and perceptions of elite female rugby players. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(18):1108-13.

Solli GS, Sandbakk SB, Noordhof DA, Ihalainen JK, Sandbakk Ø. Changes in self-reported physical fitness, performance, and side effects across the phases of the menstrual cycle among competitive endurance athletes. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2020;15(9):1324-33.

von Rosen P, Ekenros L, Solli GS, Sandbakk Ø, Holmberg HC, Hirschberg AL, et al. Offered support and knowledge about the menstrual cycle in the athletic community: a cross-sectional study of 1086 female athletes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(19):11932.

Ekenros L, von Rosen P, Solli GS, Sandbakk Ø, Holmberg HC, Hirschberg AL, et al. Perceived impact of the menstrual cycle and hormonal contraceptives on physical exercise and performance in 1,086 athletes from 57 sports. Front Physiol. 2022;13:954760.

Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, et al. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int J Surg. 2012;10(1):28-55.

Sheppard JM, Young WB. Agility literature review: classifications, training and testing. J Sports Sci. 2006;24(9):919-32.

Pontin E, Schwannauer M, Tai S, Kinderman P. A UK validation of a general measure of subjective well-being: the modified BBC subjective well-being scale (BBC-SWB). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11:150.

Sullivan GM, Feinn R. Using effect size-or why the P value is not enough. J Grad Med Educ. 2012;4(3):279-82.

Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.

Meeusen R, Duclos M, Foster C, Fry A, Gleeson M, Nieman D, et al. Prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of the overtraining syndrome: joint consensus statement of the European College of Sport Science and the American College of Sports Medicine. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45(1):186-205.