Predictive value of pre-induction cerebroplacental ratio for caesarean delivery due to foetal distress following induction of labour: a prospective observational study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20263495Keywords:
Cerebroplacental ratio, Induction of labour, Doppler ultrasound, Amniotic fluid index, modified bishop score, Estimated foetal weightAbstract
Background: Induction of labour is a commonly performed obstetric intervention when delivery is considered safer than continuation of pregnancy. Traditional parameters like the amniotic fluid index, estimated foetal weight and modified bishop score have been used to identify the development of foetal distress. This study focuses on the Cerebroplacental Ratio derived from Doppler assessment of the middle cerebral and umbilical arteries which provides information regarding foetal adaptation and the risk of foetal compromise during labour.
Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted over 12 months among 305 antenatal women with singleton, cephalic pregnancies beyond 32 weeks of gestation undergoing induction of labour. Pre-induction Cerebroplacental ratio (CPR), amniotic fluid index (AFI), estimated foetal weight (EFW), and Modified Bishop Score were assessed within 24 hours before induction. The predictive performance of CPR was compared with AFI, EFW and Modified Bishop Score using appropriate statistical and diagnostic measures.
Results: Among 305 women undergoing induction of labour, 213 (70%) had normal vaginal delivery and 92 (30%) underwent caesarean section. A CPR ≤1.1 was significantly associated with caesarean delivery and adverse neonatal outcomes. CPR ≤1.1 was also significantly associated with Apgar score <7 at 1 and 5 minutes. Among the parameters studied, CPR showed the highest sensitivity (45.54%), positive predictive value (58.08%) and diagnostic accuracy (39.02%) for adverse outcome.
Conclusion: Pre-induction cerebroplacental ratio was found to be a better predictor of adverse perinatal outcome compared with AFI, estimated foetal weight and Modified Bishop Score in women undergoing induction of labour.
References
Giussani DA. The fetal brain sparing response to hypoxia: physiological mechanisms. J Physiol. 2016;594(5):1215-30.
Laughon SK, Zhang J, Troendle J, Sun L, Reddy UM. Induction of labor in the United States: a critical appraisal of appropriateness and outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119(4):705–16.
Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, Tita AT, Silver RM, Mallett G, et al. Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(6):513–23.
Pandis GK, Papageorghiou AT, Ramanathan VG, Thompson MO, Nicolaides KH. Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labour. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;18(6):623–8.
Vasudeva A, Divya A, Saha SC, Rathore S. Cerebroplacental ratio as predictor of adverse outcome in preterm fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2017;67(3):180–5.
Morales-Roselló J, Khalil A, Morlando M, Papageorghiou AT, Bhide A, Thilaganathan B. Value of cerebroplacental ratio in prediction of adverse perinatal outcome in small-for-gestational-age and appropriate-for-gestational-age fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45(4):456–61.
Tan PC, Suguna S, Vallikkannu N, Hassan J. Ultrasound and clinical predictors for Caesarean delivery after labour induction at term. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;46(6):505-9.
Günay T, Bilir RA, Hocaoğlu M, Bör ED, Özdamar Ö, Turgut A. The role of abnormal cerebroplacental ratio in predicting adverse fetal outcome in pregnancies with scheduled induction of labor. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021;153(2):287-93.
Moreta D, Eslick GD, Benzie R. Re-evaluating the role of cerebroplacental ratio in predicting adverse perinatal outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;242:17-28.
Fiolna V, Kostiv C. Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by cerebroplacental ratio in women undergoing induction of labour.Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecoloy.53(4):473-480
Sangeereni M, Latha K.Cerebroplacental ratio as a tool for predicting neonatal outcomes in pregnancy complicated by overt and gestational diabetes. Int J Clin Obst Gynecol. 2022;6(2):31-5.
Bahadori F, Majdi L, Rashidian N, Moshari P. Cerebroplacental ratio and middle cerebral artery doppler indices as associations with maternal and neonatal outcomes in term pregnancies undergoing labor induction or augmentation: A cross-sectional study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2026;31:100481.
Makles H, Wilczyński JR. Wskaźnik mózgowo-pępowinowy i indeks płynu owodniowego jako czynniki prognostyczne zakończenia indukcji porodu cięciem cesarskim w ciążach po skończonym 41 tygodniu Cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) and amniotic fluid index (AFI) as prognostic factors of terminating pregnancy with cesarean section after induction of labour. Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2017;43(257):203-6.
Garcia-Simon R, Figueras F, Savchev S, Fabre E, Gratacos E, Oros D. Cervical condition and fetal cerebral Doppler as determinants of adverse perinatal outcome after labor induction for late-onset small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46(6):713-7.
Rathore N, Goyal M, Singh P, Yadav T, Shekhar S. Antepartum cerebroplacental ratio in low-risk pregnancy and its relationship with adverse perinatal outcome: a prospective cohort study. J Perinat Med. 2025;53(9):1224-9.
Vollgraff Heidweiller-Schreurs CA, De Boer MA, Heymans MW, Schoonmade LJ, Bossuyt PMM, Mol BWJ, et al. Prognostic accuracy of cerebroplacental ratio and middle cerebral artery Doppler for adverse perinatal outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51(3):313-22.
Ortiz JU, Graupner O, Flechsenhar S, Karge A, Ostermayer E, Abel K, et al. Prognostic value of cerebroplacental ratio in appropriate-for-gestational-age fetuses before induction of labor in late-term pregnancies. Ultraschall Med. 2023;44(1):50-5.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sudarshini, Vetriselvan, Prasanthini Sasikumar, Sahasyaa Adalarasan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.