Completeness of national partogram documentation and intrapartum monitoring at Base Hospital Muthur, Sri Lanka: a retrospective clinical audit

Authors

  • Rajiya Mohamed Muyees Base Hospital Muthur, Trincomalee, Sri Lanka
  • Thayal Nathasha Vitiyala Vidanage Base Hospital Mahiyangana, Sri Lanka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20264163

Keywords:

Sri Lanka, Partogram, Clinical audit, Intrapartum monitoring

Abstract

Background: Accurate intrapartum documentation supports continuity of care, recognition of abnormal labour, and timely clinical decision-making. This clinical audit assessed the completeness of partogram documentation and selected maternal and fetal monitoring parameters in a base hospital in Sri Lanka.

Methods: A retrospective clinical audit was conducted using 48 bed-head tickets of women managed in the labour ward of Base Hospital Muthur. Twenty documentation and monitoring criteria were assessed using a structured data-extraction checklist. A tick was coded as documented and an X as not documented. We calculated descriptive statistics at the item and record levels and examined exploratory associations.

Results: The mean maternal age was 25.85 years (standard deviation 5.69; range 17-38). Across 960 item-record observations, 904 were documented, giving an overall completeness of 94.2%. Complete documentation was observed for 10 of the 20 assessed criteria. The main gaps were caput and moulding, each documented in 28/48 records (58.3%), commencement of pushing in 42/48 (87.5%), and vaginal examination at the specified interval in 44/48 (91.7%). Twenty-seven records (56.3%) were complete for all 20 criteria, and 41/48 (85.4%) achieved at least 90% completeness. Caput and moulding accounted for 40/56 (71.4%) of all missing entries.

Conclusions: Partogram-related documentation was generally high, but deficiencies were concentrated in a small number of labour-assessment components, particularly caput and moulding. Targeted reinforcement of these elements, clarification of clinically conditional criteria, and re-audit after corrective measures are recommended.

References

World Health Organization: WHO recommendations: intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. World Health Organization, Geneva; 2018. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241550215. Accessed on 25 July 2026.

World Health Organization: WHO labour care guide: user's manual. World Health Organization, Geneva; 2020. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240017566. Accessed on 25 July 2026.

Ministry of Health, Sri Lanka: Mandatory Implementation of the National Partogram in Labour Rooms Across All Healthcare Institutions in Sri Lanka. General Circular No. 01-36/2024. 2024. Accessed September 15, 2026. Available at: https://previousmoh.health.gov.lk/CMS/cmsmoh1/viewcircular.php?cno=01-36%2F2024&med=english. Accessed on 25 July 2026.

Markos D, Bogale D. Documentation status of the modified World Health Organization partogram in public health institutions of Bale zone, Ethiopia. Reprod Health. 2015;12:81.

Yisma E, Dessalegn B, Astatkie A, Fesseha N. Completion of the modified World Health Organization (WHO) partogram during labour in public health institutions of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Reprod Health. 2013;10:23.

Gebrehiwot SW, Abrha MW, Weldearegay HG. Health care professionals' adherence to partogram use in Ethiopia: analysis of 2016 national emergency obstetric and newborn care survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):647.

Mandiwa C, Zamawe C. Documentation of the partogram in assessing the progress of labour by health care providers in Malawi's South-West zone. Reprod Health. 2017;14(1):134.

Ollerhead E, Osrin D. Barriers to and incentives for achieving partogram use in obstetric practice in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:281.

Lavender T, Cuthbert A, Smyth RM. Effect of partograph use on outcomes for women in spontaneous labour at term and their babies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;8(8):CD005461.

Bedwell C, Levin K, Pett C, Lavender DT. A realist review of the partograph: when and how does it work for labour monitoring? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):31.

Ayenew AA, Zewdu BF. Partograph utilization as a decision-making tool and associated factors among obstetric care providers in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2020;9(1):251.

Djimeli ADK, Ateudjieu J, Kenfack B. Partograph Utilization During Labor Monitoring in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J MCH AIDS. 2025;14:e018.

de Silva PHP, Galapaththy W, Lanerolle S, Dodampahala HS, Silva R, Mathota C, et al. Management of normal labour. Sri Lanka J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022;44:175-212.

Ayehubizu LM, Tibebeu AT. Partograph utilization and associated factors among obstetric care givers in governmental health institutions of Jigjiga and Degehabur towns, Somali region, Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2022;17(3):e0264373.

Ubom AE, Nieto-Calvache AJ, Malel ZJ, Nunes I. FIGO position statement on the use of the WHO labor care guide versus the partograph. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025;170(1):25-7.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-31

How to Cite

Muyees, R. M., & Nathasha Vitiyala Vidanage, T. (2026). Completeness of national partogram documentation and intrapartum monitoring at Base Hospital Muthur, Sri Lanka: a retrospective clinical audit. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 14(11), 5064–5068. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20264163

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles