Comparison of vitrification and slow freezing for cryopreservation of cleavage stage embryos (Day 3) and its impact on clinical outcome

Manisha Choudhary; Ravikant Soni; Mohan Lal Swarankar; Swati Garg

doi:10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20150826

Authors

Manisha Choudhary Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College & Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan
Ravikant Soni Department of Biochemistry, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College & Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan
Mohan Lal Swarankar Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College & Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan
Swati Garg Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College & Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20150826

Keywords:

Vitrification, Slow freezing, Human cleavage stage embryos, Survival rate, Clinical pregnancy rate, Implantation rate

Abstract

Background: The objective of this retrospective study was to compare the efficacy of slow freezing and Vitrification for the cryopreservation of supernumerary cleavage stage embryos on day 3 after IVF and its impact on clinical outcome.

Methods: 485 supernumerary embryos of IVF cycles (from Oct 2011 to Dec 2012) were cryopreserved by slow freezing method while 502 embryos (from Jan 2013 to April 2014) by Vitrification method. 362/485 and 230/502 embryos were thawed for FET cycles (65 patients in each group).After warming the survival rate, post warmed embryo morphology, clinical pregnancy and implantation rates were evaluated and compared between the two groups.

Results: There were 65 frozen thawed cycles in each group. The percentage of excellent and good morphology embryos before cryopreservation were same in both the groups, but after thawing the results were significantly in favour of Vitrification as compared to Slow freezing. In Vitrification group versus Slow freezing group, the different outcomes were survival rate (96.95% vs. 69.06%, p-0.000), post warmed excellent morphology embryos (94.17% vs. 60.8%, p-0.000) clinical pregnancy rate (41.53% vs. 21.53%, p-0.043) and the implantation rate (14.41% vs. 7.01%, p-0.024).

Conclusions: Vitrification is a promising alternate to the conventional slow freezing method in terms of not only excellent survival and post warmed excellent morphology embryo rate but also higher clinical pregnancy and implantation rate.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Liebermann J, DietI J, Vanderzwalmen, Tucker. Recent developments in human oocyte, embryo and blastocyst Vitrification; where are we now? Reproductive Biomedicine online. 2003;7:623-33.

Trounson A, Mohr L. Human pregnancy following cryopreservation, thawing and transfer of eight-cell embryo. Nature. 1983;305:707-9.

Mazur P. Equilibrium, quasi-equilibrium and nonequilibrium freezing of mammalian embryos. Cell Biophys. 1990;17:53-92.

Rall WF, Fahy G M. Ice-free cryopreservation of mouse embryos at - 1960c by Vitrification. Nature. 1985; 313:573-5.

Gordts S, Roziere D, Campo R, Noto V, Survival and pregnancy outcome after ultra-rapid freezing of human embryos. Fertil Steril. 1990;53:469-72.

Trounson A, Peura A, Kirby C 1987, Ultra rapid freezing: a new low cost and effective method of embryo cryopreservation. Fertility and sterility 48, 843-849.

Fahy GM, Mac Farlane DR, Angella CA, Meryman HT 1984,Vitrification as an approach to cryopreservation. Cryobiology 21,407-426.

Kasai M, Komi JH, Takakamo A et al 1990. A simple method for mouse embryo cryopreservation in a low toxicity Vitrification solution, without appreciable loss of viability. Journal of reproduction and fertility 89,91-97.

Kuleshova LL, Mac Farlane DR, Trounson AO 1999 Sugar exerts a major influence on the Vitrification properties of Ethylene glycol based solution and have a low toxicity to embryos and oocytes. Cryobiology 38, 119-130.

El-Danasouri I, Selman H, Successful pregnancies and deliveries after a simple Vitrification protocol for day 3 human embryos. Fertil Steril 2001; 76:400-2.

Vanderzwalmen P, Bertin G, Debauche C, Standaert V, Bollen N, Van Roosendal E et al. Vitrification of human blastocysts with the hemistraw carrier: application of assisted hatching after-thawing. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1504-11.

Liebermann J, Tucker MJ, Graham JR, Han T, Davis A, Levy MJ. Blastocyst development after Vitrification of multipronuclear zygotes using the Flexipet denuding pipette. Repord Biomed online 2002; 4:146-50.

Kuwayama M. Highly efficient Vitrification for cryopreservation of human occytes and embryos: The cryotop method. Theriogenology. 2007, 67:73-80.

Mukaida T, Nakamura S, Tomiyama T, Wada S, Oka C, Kasai M et al, Vitrification of human blastocysts using cryoloops: Clinical outcome of 223 cycles. Hum Reprod 2003; 18:384-91.

Rama Raju GA, Haranath GB, Krishna K M et al 2005,Vitrification of human 8-cell embryos, a modified protocol for better pregnancy rates. Reproductive Biomedicine online 11,434-437.

Desai N, Blackmon H. Szeptycki J, Goldfarb J, Cryoloop vitrification of human day 3 cleavage stage embryos: Post-vitrification development, pregnancy outcome and live births. Reprod Biomed online 2007; 14: 208-13.

Kuwayama M, Vajta G Leda S, Kato O, Comparison of open and closed methods for Vitrification of human embryos and the elimination of potential contamination. Reprod Biomed online 2005; 11: 608-14.

Balaban B, Urman B, Ata B, Isiklar A, Larman MG, Hamilton R et al. A randomized Controlled study of human Day 3 embryo cryopreservation by slow freezing or Vitrification. Human Reprod, 2008; 23:1976-82.

Valojerdi MR, Yazdi PE, Karimian L, Hassani F, Movaghar B. Vitrification versus Slow freezing give excellent survival, post warming embryo morphology and pregnancy outcome for human cleaved embryos. J Assist Reprod. Genet: 2009; 26:347-354.

Libermann J, Tucker MJ. Comparison of Vitrification and conventional cryopreservation of day 5 and day 6 blastocysts during clinical application Fertil Steril. 2006; 86:20-6.

Valdez CA, Abas Maznio, Takahashi Y, et al. Successful cryopreservation of mouse blastocysts using a new Vitrification solution. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 91992;6:793-802.

Chi H J, Koo JJ, Kim MY, et al. cryopreservation of human embryos using ethylene glycol in controlled slow freezing. Human Reproduction. 2002;17:2146-51.

Mukaida T, Woda S, Takahashi K, et al. Vitrification of human embryos based on the assessment of suitable conditions for 8-cell mouse embryos: Human Reproduction. 1998;13:2874-2879.

Bieslanski A, Bergeron H, Lau PCK, Deveinsh J. Microbial contamination of embryos and semen during long term of banking in liquid nitrogen. Cryobiology. 2003;46:146-52.

Saito H, Ishida G M, Kaneko T, et al. Application of Vitrification to human embryo freezing. Gynaecology and obstetrics investigation 2000;49:145-9.

Takahashi K, Mukaida T, Goto T, Oka C. Perinatal outcome of blastocyst transfer with Vitrification using cryoloop: a 4- year follow-up study. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:88-92.