DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20151242

Goniometry of elbow carrying angle: a comparative clinical study on sexual dimorphism in young males and females

Wasim Bari, Masroor Alam, Saif Omar

Abstract


Background: Carrying angle of the elbow joint is an angle formed between the axis of arm and axis of forearm in an extended elbow joint supinated at the radio-ulnar joints. It is an obtuse angle which facilitates free swinging of arm by deviating it from the pelvis during walking or carrying an object. Carrying angle increases with age and is reportedly greater in females. Morphometry of this angle may be helpful in identification of elbow disorders along with surgical reconstruction and evaluation of traumatic elbow. The aim of this study was to clinically observe sexual dimorphism of carrying angle among young males and females with normal anatomy and bony configuration of elbows between 21 to 25 years of age the in the outdoor clinic of the Department of Orthopaedics.

Methods: Four hundred individuals of equal sex ratio underwent bilateral goniometry. The measurement of carrying angle was performed using goniometer.

Results: Carrying angle was observed to be greater in females. There was no correlation between carrying angle and height of individual or length of forearm.

Conclusions: Carrying angle is greater in females may be because exhibits high sexual dimorphism. It may also considered be as a secondary sexual characteristic. Utility of goniometry of carrying angle is observed during orthopaedic reconstruction of elbow disorders after treatment of distal fractures of humerus and evaluation of traumatic injuries at the elbow joint.

 


Keywords


Carrying angle, Elbow, Goniometry, Sexual dimorphism, Trauma

Full Text:

PDF

References


Snell RS. Clinical Anatomy by Regions, 9th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2012: 408.

Khare GN. New observations on carrying angle. Ind J Med Sci. 1999;53:61-7.

Kothapalli J. The carrying angle of elbow – A correlative and comparative study. Int J Cur Res Rev. 2013;5(7):71-6.

Garg K. B D Chaurasia’s Human Anatomy, Vol-I, 4th ed. India: CBS Publishers & Distributors. 2007:149.

Zampagni ML. Estimating the elbow carrying angle with an Electrogoniometer: Acquisition of data and reliability of measurements. Healio Orthop. 2008;31(4):1-9.

Decker GAG. Lee McGregor’s Synopsis of Surgical Anatomy, 12th ed. India, Varghese Publishing House. 1995:454.

Clippinger KS. Dance Anatomy & Kinesiology, 2nd ed. Human Kinetics. 2006:413.

Cain EL. Elbow injuries in throwing athletes: A current concepts review. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31:621-35.

Hutchinson MR. Biomechanics and development of the elbow in the young throwing athlete. Clin Sports Med. 2004;23:531-44.

Cwirko-Godycki M. Sexing skeletal remains. The human skeleton in forensic medicine. 3rd ed. 1978:112-52.

Balasubramanium P. Carrying angle in children. A normative study. J Paed Orth B. 2006;15:37-40.

Beals RK. The normal carrying angle of the elbow. A radiographic study of 422 patients. Clin Orth Rel Res. 1976;119:194-6.

Golden DW. Elbow range of motion and clinical carrying angle in a healthy paediatric population. J Paed Orth B. 2007;16:144-9.

Demirel H. Measurement of the carrying angle of the elbow in 2000 children at ages six and fourteen years. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2004;38:274-6.

Paraskevas G. Study of the carrying angle of the human elbow joint in full extension: A morphometric analysis. Surg Radiol Anat. 2004;26:19-23.

Terra BB. Evolution of the carrying angle of the elbow: A clinical and radiographic study. Acta Orthop Bras. 2011;19(2):79-82.

Emami MJ. Normal carrying angle of the elbow. Shiraz Mijri. 1998;12(1):37-9.

Dai L. Measurement of the Baumann angle in Chinese children and its clinical relevance. J Paed Orthop B. 1999;8:197-9.

Morrey BF. Carrying angle of the human elbow joint. J Orth Res. 1984;1:369-78.

London JT. Kinematics of the elbow. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63(4):529-35.