DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20151445

Comparative evaluation of propofol-ketamine and propofol-fentanyl for minor surgical procedures

Dharamsing Pawar, Pankaj Bhople, Sushma Pandey, Sonali Khobragade

Abstract


Background: Aim of the present study was to compare the clinical efficacy of combination of propofol-ketamine and propofol-fentanyl in terms of haemodynamic variables, recovery profile and side effects.

Methods: The study enrolling 120 patients of (age 20-50 years) ASA grade I & II were randomly allocated in two groups of sixty each. They were undergoing short surgical procedures lasting up to 20 minutes. Group I received injection ketamine 0.5 mg/kg over 2 minutes followed by injection propofol at rate of 1 ml over 3 seconds till the end point of induction (till loss of consciousness and loss of eye lash reflex). Group II received injection fentanyl 1.5 µg/kg followed by 1 ml propofol till the end point of induction and maintenance of anesthesia. Hemodynamic variables were recorded pre, intra and postoperatively at regular intervals. Recovery and side effects was also assessed. The results were tabulated and analyzed statistically.

Results: Patients in both the groups produce minor haemodynamic changes and did not differ significantly. The recovery time was longer in group I as compare to group II. We found no complications of serious type except vomiting and nausea in group II. Discharge criteria were significantly earlier in group I than group II.

Conclusions: Both propofol-ketamine and propofol-fentanyl was useful for short surgical procedures but propofol-ketamine group offers more advantage.

 


Keywords


Propofol, Ketamine, Fentanyl, Hemodynamic variables, Recovery time

Full Text:

PDF

References


Jakobsson J, Davidson S, Andreen M. Opioid supplementation to propofol anaesthesia for out patients abortion: a comparison between alfentanil fentanyl and placebo. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1991;35:767-70.

Claeys MA, Geptts E, Camu F. Hemodynamic changes during anaesthesia induced and maintained with propofol. Br J Anaesthesia. 1988;60:3-9.

Jakobsson J, Oddby E, Rane K. Patient evaluation of four different combination of intravenous anaesthetics for short out-patient procedures. Anaesthesia. 1993;48:1005-7.

Slogoff S, Allen GK. The role of baroreceptors in the cardiovascular response to ketamine. Anesth Analg. 1974;53:704.

Guit JBM, Koning HM, Coster ML. Ketamine as analgesic for total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol. Anaesthesia. 1991;46(1):24-7.

Ronald D, Miller. Anaesthesia, 5th Edition, volume 2:2233.

Moffat AC, Murrey AW, Fitch. Opioid supplementation during propofol anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 1989;44:644-7.

Saha K, Kaushik, Saigopal M, Rajini S. Comparative evaluation of propofol-ketamine and propofol-fentanyl in minor surgery. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2001;45(2):100-3.

Rolly G, Versichelen L, Huyghe L. Effect of speed of injection on induction of anaesthesia using propofol. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 1985;57:743-6.

Mayer M, Ochmann O, Doenicke A. Influence of propofol-ketamine Vs propofol-fentanyl anaesthesia on haemodynamics and analgesia. Anesthetist. 1990;39:609-16.

Hui TW, Short TG, Hong W. Additive interactions between propofol and ketamine when used for anaesthesia induction in female patients. Anaesthesia. 1995;82:641-8.

Tan CH, Onsiong MK, Kua SW. The effect of ketamine pretreatment on propofol injection in 100 women. Anaesthesia. 1998;53:296-307.

Hernandez C, Parramon F, Gorcia-Velascop. Comparative study of 3 techniques for total intravenous anaesthesia midazolam-ketamine, propofol-ketamine and propofol-fentanyl. Rev Esp anestesiol Reanium. 1999;46(4):154-8.

Akin A, Guler G, Esmaoglu A, Bedirli. A comparison of fentanyl-propofol with a ketamine-propofol combination for sedation during endometrial biopsy. J Clin Anaesthesia. 2005;17(3):187-90.