DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20162948

Hospital-based study of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in surgical site infections with special reference to determination of environmental and human sources

Poorva P. Bhave, Meena N. Ramteerthakar, S. Kartikeyan, Nilima R. Patil

Abstract


Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Carriage of MRSA by healthcare personnel is a potential source for SSI. The present study was carried out to study the frequency of MRSA in SSI; to identify the most suitable identification test for routine use; and to determine the environmental and human source of MRSA.

Methods: In this prospective study, 195 SSI-pus samples were processed for primary staining, culture and biochemical tests. Cefoxitin and oxacillin disc diffusion test and oxacillin broth dilution test were used to detect MRSA and to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) among the identified S. aureus. Environment was sampled periodically using air settle plates and swabs from various sites.  Healthcare personnel were screened for nasal and hand carriage of MRSA.

Results: Of the 205 isolates, 46 were S. aureus, and among these, 18 strains were MRSA. There was no discrepency in the result by any of the three methods used. MRSA carriage, found on the hands of three healthcare personnel, had same anti-biogram as those strains simultaneously obtained from the patients. All three personnel responded to Mupirocin treatment. No MRSA was obtained from the environment.

Conclusions: MRSA is an important source of SSI. Cefoxitin disc diffusion method seems suitable technique for routine use. Periodic screening of healthcare workers for carriage of MRSA will prevent outbreaks of nosocomial infections.


Keywords


MRSA, Oxacillin MIC, Cefoxitin, Surgical site infections

Full Text:

PDF

References


Chakraborty SP, KarMahapatra S, Bal M, Roy S. Isolation and Identification of vancomycin resistant Staphylococcus aureus from Post-operative Pus sample. Al Ameen J Med Sci. 2011;4(2):152-68.

Negi V, Pal S, Juyal D, Sharma MK, Sharma M. Bacteriological profile and their antibiogram: A study from resource constrained rural setting of Uttarakhand state, India. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(10):DC17-20.

Anderson DJ, Kaye KS, Chen LF, Schmader KE, Choi Y, Sloane R, et al. Clinical and financial outcomes due to Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Surgical Site Infection: A multi-centre matched outcomes study. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(12):e8305.

Tiwari HK, Das AK, Sapkota D, Sivrajan K, Pahwa VK. Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus: prevalence and antibiogram in a tertiary care hospital in western Nepal. Journal of Infection in Developing Countries. 2009;3(9):681-4.

Hussein NR, Basharat Z, Muhammed AH, Al-Dabbagh SA. Comparative Evaluation of MRSA Nasal Colonization Epidemiology in the Urban and Rural Secondary School Community of Kurdistan, Iraq. PLoS ONE 2015; 10 (5): e0124920.

Yan M, Pamp SJ, Fukuyama J, Hwang PH, Cho DY, Holmes S, et al. Nasal microenvironments and interspecific interactions influence nasal microbiota complexity and S. aureus carriage. Cell Host Microbe. 2013;14(6):631-40.

Collee JG, Miles RS, Watt B. Tests for identification of bacteria. In: Collee JG, Fraser AG, Marmion BP, Simmons A. (Eds.) Mackie and McCartney’s Practical Medical Microbiology. 14th Edn. London: Churchill Livingstone. 2006:131-49.

Van Enk RA, Thompson KD. Use of a primary isolation medium for recovery of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 1992;30(2):504-5.

Kirby WM. Extraction of a highlypotent penicillin inactivator from penicillin resistant Staphylococci. Science. 1944;99(2579):452-53.

Livermore DM. Antibiotic resistance in staphylococci. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2000;(16Suppl)1:3-10.

Manian FA, Meyer PL, Setzer J, Senkel D. Surgical Site Infections associated with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Do Postoperative Factors play a role? Clin. Infect. Dis. 2003;36:863-8.

Biradar S, Roopa C. Aerobic bacteriology of surgical site infection in a tertiary care centre. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 2015;4(9): 969-74.

Divya P. Prevalence and susceptibility pattern of Staphylococcus aureus in post-operative surgical wound infection at tertiary care hospital. Int J Health Sci Res. 2015;5(7):129.

Sonawane J, Kamath N, Swaminathan R, Dosani K. Bacterial profile of Surgical site infections and their antibiograms in a tertiary care hospital in Navi Mumbai. Bombay Hosp Journal. 2010;52(3):358-61.

Anand KB, Agarwal P, Kumar S, Kalpila K. Comparison of cefoxitin disk diffusion test, oxacillin screen agar and PCR for mec-A gene for detection of MRSA. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2009;27:27-9.

Swenson JM, Tenover FC, Cefoxitin Disk Study Group. Results of disk diffusion testing with Cefoxitin correlate with presence of mec A in Staphylococcus spp. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(8):3818-23.

Felten A, Grandry B, Lagrange PH, Casin I. Evaluation of three techniques for the detection of MRSA. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40(8):2766-71.

Prasad KN, Kumar R, Tiwari DP, Ayyagari A. Comparison of various conventional methods with a polymerase chain reaction assay for detecting methicillin resistant & susceptible Staphylococcus aureus strains. Indian J Med Res. 2001;112:198-202.

Mohanasoundaram KM, Lalitha MK. Comparison of phenotypic versus genotypic methods in the detection of Methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Indian J Med Res. 2008;127(1):78-84.

Shobha KL, Rao PS, Thomas J. Survey of Staphylococcus isolates among hospital personnel, environment and their antibiogram with special emphasis on MRSA. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2005;23(3):186-8.

Rajaduraipandi K, Mani KR, Panneerselvam K, Mani M, Bhaskar M, Manikandan P. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a multicentre study. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2006;24(1):34-8.